Reject The Premise
You've heard the 'smooth sailing' metaphor, as in it's either smooth sailing or it's not, right?
In writing, it's our goal to make the writing as choppy as possible. For someone like me, whose whole goal in life is to make things comfortable for those around her, this is a hard idea to wrap my head around. So, in my fiction (as in my life), my characters often accept what others hand to them, reacting instead of proacting (yeah, I made the word up. So what?)
But that is dull. And makes for not very likeable characters, unless you happen to like super-neurotic, premise-accepting people (and if you do, you are likely a friend of mine).
So my goal in writing right now is to make my characters as feisty and proacting as possible. For example, the hero in my current WIP is going to kiss the heroine to get her to stop asking questions, but instead of leaning into the kiss, as she really wants to do (he's smokin'!), she's going to haul off and slap him, because she knows he's only kissing her to shut her up, not because he wants to kiss her.
It's an eye-opener, thinking of things to put my characters through I would never want a friend to experience. But it'll make for better fiction. And maybe help me get more proacting, too.
Megan
Pearls and a Spider--my new cover
Here's the cover for Bespelling Jane Austen, the anthology headlined by Mary Balogh that's coming out in October. Isn't it cute! And yes, there will be textual interest--embossing on the red. I'm very excited about it.
We all picked a favorite Austen novel and "bespelled" it. Mary's Almost Persuaded is a version of Persuasion with reincarnation; Susan Krinard's Blood and Prejudice (I think you know what that's based on!) is set in modern day New York (with vampires); and Colleen Gleason takes the Gardella vampire hunters out for another spin in Northanger Castle. Mine, based on Emma, is Little To Hex Her, set in the gossipy village of contemporary Washington, DC. The title is based on the opening lines of Emma:
Emma Woodhouse, handsome, clever, and rich, with a comfortable home and happy disposition, seemed to unite some of the best blessings of existence; and had lived nearly twenty-one years in the world with very little to distress or vex her.I'm very pleased that this book is being released at the same time as Jane and the Damned (HarperCollins) about Jane Austen and the sexy, amoral, decadent vampires of Georgian England. Oh, and there's a French invasion too. I have a killer cover for that but it's still under wraps...
I'm managing to do some reading on my commute, when I'm not falling asleep. I'm reading The Taste of Sorrow by Jude Morgan, a novel about the Brontes, which is phenomenal. It has already caused me to miss my stop. It's released in the US as Charlotte and Emily: A Novel of the Brontes (dumb title, but a better cover than the UK version which is the one I have. And what about Anne?).
What are YOU reading this week?
"To Deceive a Duke" Winner!
Book Shopping
What did I get, you ask me? Two books.
Brookes Gazetteer
Interestingly enough the title page says:
The General Gazetteer, or compendious Geographical Dictionary containing a Description of the Empires, Kingdoms, States, Provinces, Cities Towns Ports Seas Harbours Rivers Lakes Mountains &c In the Known World with the Government Customs Manners and Religion of the Inhabitants; the Extent, Boundaries and Natural Production of each Country; The Trade, Manufacturing and Curiosities of the Cities and Towns; their longitude, latitude, Bearings and distances in English Miles from remarkable places and the various events by which they have been distinguished. Illustrated by Eight Maps.
The remarkable thing is that all 8 maps are still in the book! They fold out.
Another remarkable thing is that both New York (USA) and San Francisco seem to have been omitted. Huh? Nevertheless, I anticipate many happy perusals.
A Picturesque Tour Of The Thames
And here's the corker: this book contains lists of the contents of rooms in Hampton Court and Windsor Palace plus a map of the Hampton Court area, though it doesn't fold out.
But I am very pleased with my books, and I will share more from them if I can.
To Deceive a Duke
The unsettling attraction is still strong between them, despite the secrets they hide. But as the unknown threat grows, they are thrown together in the most intimate of ways. Clio knows there is only so long she can resist her mysterious duke!
"Amanda McCabe has crafted a spell-binding, sensuous read grounded in Greek mythology. Filled with muses, romance, intrigue, and mystery, this thrill-of-the-hunt Regency historical evokes visions of Aphrodite and Apollo amongst the ton setting. Like any great read, I was sad for it to end!" --The Season on To Catch a Rogue (read full review here!)
Last month I launched the "Muses of Mayfair" trilogy with book one, To Catch a Rogue. Now it's almost May, and I'm very excited to talk about book two, To Deceive a Duke! (Book three, To Kiss a Count, is out in June). One commenter today will win a signed copy of Duke...
In Rogue we met the second-eldest Chase Muse, Clio, and saw her clash with the mysterious Duke of Averton. In Duke they meet again, and those sparks fly between them once more--only this time they have an even harder time keeping them contained! They have to learn to work together to save a rare and precious hoard of ancient temple altar silver--but can they do it while also keeping their hands off each other? I think not...
After meeting this passionate pair in Rogue, I was very eager to see what was really going on between them. As I made my way through their story they often surprised me--and I'm supposed to be their creator, the director of their story! Ha. They usually paid me no heed and went off on their own rollercoaster ride.
It was the middle of winter when I started writing this book, and I was sick of cold, gray skies. I needed some sun ASAP, even if it was just vicariously! So I sent Clio, the duke, Sir Walter Chase, and his fourth daughter Terpsichore (Cory) off to bright Sicily for an archaeological dig. It was so much fun to read travel and history books (and sometimes historical travel books!) about the island, and imagine being somewhere warm and filled with olive and lemon trees, flowers, beautiful architecture, and historic sites. The ancient city Clio and her family are excavating is based on a real place, Enna, which was colonized by the Greeks in the 6th century BC and became a sort of vacation resort for them. Destroyed during the Second Punic Wars with its inhabitants killed or enslaved, it was buried in a mudslide in the 12th century which preserved an ancient agora, theater, and gorgeous holiday villas under almond and olive orchards. The medieval castle Clio and Averton explore together is based on a real site, as if Clio's farmhouse where the silver is buried and the silver itself. This altar set is based on the famous "Morgantina silver" now in the Met (a great article about it can be found here, and more info about the history of the Enna province here).
As we learned in Rogue, Clio is way passionate about what she believes in and is willing to go to great lengths to protect it--but so is the duke. What will happen if they again find themselves at cross purposes? (And I wish I knew where I could get Clio's blue dress on the cover. It's certainly impractical for excavation work but it's so gorgeous!)
I have lots more info on my website, including some great sources for the history of the era in the History Behind The Book section. And if you don't win today, you can enter the contest on my website or visit Kwana's Blog before the end of of today to enter the contest there! (Giveaways galore!)
Where would you have a dream vacation? What are some objects you've seen in museums that have captured your imagination? And I have the potential to write more "Muses" books in the future--any ideas for possible settings for them? (I'd love to send Cory, who is an artist, to illustrate some sites in Egypt...). And on a completely unrelated note, how terrific was Small Island on "Masterpiece" last week??? I loved it.
Winner of Something Scandalous
Unexpected Find-Country houses
Mark Girouard is more known to me for writing books on my research shelf, books like The Country House Companion or Life in the English Country House .
Girouard begins the article:
When I was an undergraduate in the 1950s, I used to stay with my old great-aunt, the Dowager Duchess of Devonshire, at Hardwick Hall...
The idea of visiting such a house as a relation boggled my mind! Perhaps Girouard's love of English architecture began with such visits. He later read the old account books, letters, and other documents from Hardwick Hall, piecing together what happened there.
In the time of Bess of Hardwicke, for example, Girouard described how, in the early 1600s, the Earl of Rutland would arrive on horseback, the gate opened by the porter, the servants who could take away the horses, the greeting by the Usher of the Hall. Girouard goes on to describe a meal and the entertainment.
In addition to Hardwicke Hall, the article includes photos (by Fred J. Moon) of several other Houses, such as Blenheim, Penshurst Place, Knoll, Burghley House, and Castle Howard, mentioning that Castle Howard was the location for the recent (in 1985) TV miniseries, Brideshead Revisited
Girouard talks about the 1700s as the most pompous age of the country house. He discusses Queen Victoria setting the style for "elegance and importance without ostentation." He moves on to another country house heyday, the Edwardian Age.
What does he leave UNDONE?
The REGENCY!!!!
Not a mention of the Regency era, not one. Not even a peep about the Pavilion.
Do you have a favorite English Country House? I remember loving Stratfield Saye, Wellington's house, because it still seemed like a real home. In fact, members of the family still lived there. I also was amazed by Chatsworth.
How about you?
Remember, I'm still giving away prizes this week at Diane's Blog. My plans for Wednesday are UNDONE, but Friday I'll feature my story in Pleasurably Undone, The Unlacing of Miss Leigh.
Christie Kelley interview and giveaway
— Romantic Times Reviews
Today we're thrilled to have a return visit from Kensington author Christie Kelley who's here to talk about her April release Something Scandalous and give away a signed copy! So please jump in and ask questions to be eligible for the drawing.
Raised as the youngest daughter of the Duke of Kendal, Elizabeth learns a devastating truth on his deathbed: he wasn’t her father at all. And because the Duke had no sons, his title and fortune must go to his only male heir: a distant cousin who left England for America long ago. Anticipating the man’s imminent occupation of her home, Elizabeth anxiously searches for her mother’s diary, and the secret of her paternity…Christie, welcome back to the Riskies! Tell us about your new book.
Arriving in London with his seven siblings, William Atherton intends to sell everything and return to his beloved Virginia farm, and his fiancĂ©e, as quickly as possible. But as Elizabeth shows William an England he never knew, and graciously introduces his siblings to London society, it becomes clear the two are meant for each other. Soon, Elizabeth finds herself determined to seduce the man who can save not only her family name, but her heart…
Something Scandalous is the third book in the Spinster Club series. The Spinster Club series revolves around the lives of five Regency women who have all made up their minds not to marry. But one of the women is playing matchmaker without the others noticing.
When did we first meet the heroine in the series and did you find your ideas about her had changed when it actually came to writing the book?
Elizabeth is introduced to the readers in my debut novel, Every Night I'm Yours. I knew even when I introduced her that she was hiding a secret about her parentage. So my ideas for her didn’t change that much when it came time to write her book.
How do you keep track of characters throughout the series?
I wrote a character sheet that I keep in a MS Word document so I remember the basics of their coloring and characteristics. I’ve added to that as the heroes are introduced.
I love the idea of the culture clash between h/h. What research did you do for an American visiting 1817 London?
Actually, the biggest research I had to do was on immigration and laws of succession during this period. I had originally wanted William to spend most of his years in the US, but I discovered this wasn’t possible. In order for him (and his father before him) to continue to be the heir presumptive for the dukedom, I had to send his father to the US as an emissary for the British government. Unfortunately, a pesky little war popped up in 1812. So I had to move Will’s family to Canada.
Did you find it challenging that your hero might own slaves? How did you handle that?
Actually, my hero wouldn’t have had enough money to own slaves so it wasn’t an issue that came up in the story. Had he decided to sell all his properties in England and move back to the US, it might have become an issue.
Your heroine's journey hangs on a family secret. Was there a particular event or character that inspired this, fictional or real life?
There was nothing but my crazy imagination that inspired this part of the story. I wanted to write a story such that my heroine, Elizabeth discovers something scandalous about her mother. Up until Elizabeth discovers she is not her father’s daughter, she had always believed her mother to be the perfect lady. Discovering this secret turns Elizabeth’s life upside down and makes her examine her own transgressions.
What's your favorite scene in the book?
I don’t want to give too much away but the scene where Elizabeth finally finds her mother diary always makes me giggle.
What in the book gave you the most trouble?
Writing for Zebra, I wasn’t sure how my editor was going to react to the diary entries the hero and heroine read. I didn’t give him a heads up on the scenes because I really wanted him to read them first and then tell me if I’d gone too far. Thankfully, he only said “Wow.”
You have that rarity in romance publishing, a male editor. Does he give you any particular insights into the male mind (or whatever)?
I love my editor! He totally gets my voice and is enthusiastic about my writing. I can’t say he gives me any particular insight into the male mind but having five brothers and now a husband and two boys, I think I sort of understand their minds. I’m not sure any woman can ever completely understand them.
What's next for you?
I have two more novels in the Spinster Club series coming out. Scandal of the Season will be an October release and the last book, tentatively titled Her Perfect Match, will come out in June 2011.
Christie will drop by to chat, so let's get the conversation going!
Cheaters Never Win
Many times the discussion of romance dealbreakers comes up; for some people, it's sleeping with someone else while the romance is building (not a dealbreaker for me; I just call that 'being an entitled man.').
For most of us, and why we carry the stigma of romance as long as anyone remembers the phrase 'bodice-ripper,' it's rape.
For me (in addition to the rape, obviously), it's adultery. It's funny, I haven't really thought of it before--after all, I am a "Risky" Regency, and not usually conservative in my views. But the other night, my husband and I were watching a 1966 movie called Grand Prix starring James Garner, Eva Marie Saint and Yves Montand, among others. It was about the Formula 1 racing circuit, and my husband recalled loving it when young because of the racing footage.
We joined it midway, and there's this romance going on between Garner and a woman who, it turns out, is married to another driver, a Scot who's recovering from a race accident. Huh. Made me uncomfortable to see it all out there in the open, but whatever. Then Montand's character is madly in love with Saint's only, it turns out, he's already married to another stunning blonde (man had a type, is all I'm saying).
"So," I said, turning to my husband, "this movie is all about adultery." I didn't hate the film, but I didn't like it that everyone seemed okay with the cheating. If that plot line had been in a romance story? Whoa, there would've been SUCH a kerfuffle.
'Course, I'm a hypocrite, because one of my favorite series is Julia Spencer-Fleming's Clare Fergusson and Russ Van Alstyne series. But there the characters know, and suffer for, what they're doing.
I guess the difference for me is knowing that the characters are aware of their actions, and are making choices, not just falling into things because it's convenient. Another example is one of my all-time favorite books, Jane Eyre. Rochester, of course, knew full well what he was attempting to do--but his love for Jane made him choose to live with damnation. I kinda respected that when I first read it, and still admire Rochester for choosing love over propriety (some would say morality, and that is a valid word, also).
Okay, so not a dealbreaker precisely, but if the hero or heroine is somewhat insouciant about their cheating--no matter how valid the reason--I'm not gonna like them.
We've all discussed the usual dealbreakers; do you have any unusual ones?
Megan
All About Schedule OMG.HEA.2010
Turn to the Subgenre Definition pages beginning on page 17 and pick your subgenre. You may pick only one. If you write in a variety of subgenres, choose 21, Indecisive wallower, 22, Overachiever or 23, I'm just a girl who can't say no. Enter in Box A.
Take your zip code, divide it by the number of pages completed in your WIP and enter the number in Box B.
On the following lines enter the following numbers from the first fifty pages of the book:
- Times your h/h have sex. If you are writing an inspirational, you should enter 10.
- Times your h/h have sex with another person(s) or being(s) (including, but not limited to, shapeshifters) and multiply by five. If you are writing an inspirational, you should enter 50.
- Heroic hair-raking within the first fifty pages.
- Mentions of hero's eye/hair color.
- Mentions of heroine's eye/hair color. Note: if colors for 2 or 3 change, please refer to Publication CE.AA.2010.
Note: If your score is less than 2, please make sure you are writing within the correct genre. Refer to Publication WTF.2010 for more guidance and complete the appropriate Genre Form.
Now turn to your most recently published work. Enter its ISBN, page count, and predominant font family used on the cover in Box C.
Please check the appropriate box if your cover contains the following:
- Historically inaccurate shirt.
- Mullet.
- Green or blue eyeshadow (hero or heroine).
- Chandelier with lightbulbs instead of candles.
- Physically impossible stance.
- Instances of egregious photoshop art, add 10 for each.
- *Extra nipples, limbs or digits (hero or heroine), multiply each by 10 and enter.
- Glaring typo on your back cover blurb, enter 20.
- Mantitty, enter 50.
Enter your total for Box C.
If your cover art contains none of the above, please refer to Publication WTF.2010 as you may be writing a different genre.
The totals for Boxes B and C, plus the ages of your children and/or pets and your agent's and editors' heights in centimeters.
Multiply by 3.141592653589793238462643383279502884197169399375
Multiply by 10 to make a nice big fat number and round off to the nearest thousand. This is your estimated tax for 2010.
Please feel free to share your tax expertise with the rest of us. It's never too early.
Buttering You Up or Death by Butter
From the New Family Receipt Book, 1815.
237. Improved Method of making Butter.So, interesting things here. Number one, that poor dairy-maid! Churning butter twice a day for 2-3 hours each time? Talk about your upper arm strength. And my goodness but that's 4-6 hours of work right there. I'm guessing that dairy-maid was responsible for more than churning butter. We ended up with organized labor for a reason, folks.
If the dairy consist of three or four cows they should be milked in summer thrice a day; in the morning, at noon, and in the evening. Each milking must be kept by itself, in flat wooden vessels, to cool in like manner ; and thus in succession for two or three days, according to the temperature of the air, the milk thickening, and thence is fit for churning, soonest in the warmest weather. The quantity of butter will be generally in the proportion of a pound (twenty-two ounces) for each ten pints, or five English gallons of milk. In winter the cows are to be milked only twice a day, and the milk is to be put into the churn warm from the cow, where it must stand a day or two longer than in summer before it becomes sufficiently thick; although to promote the coagulation, it is sometimes brought near the kitchen fire, particularly on the preceding night before it is churned; and in intense cold, it will be necessary to add a small quantity of boiling water. The operation of churning is performed with the plunge churn, from two or three hours, for thirty or forty pints of milk; and at the last stage of the process a little cold water thrown in has the effect of promoting the separation of the butter from the milk, and making it twice a day: and even before the cloth is taken off, the top and bottom are well rubbed every day.
N.B. The dairy-maid must not be disheartened if she does not succeed perfectly in her first attempt.
What's with the 22 ounces in a pound? (There are 16 ounces today) And ten pints in 5 gallons of milk? (There are 8 pints in a gallon, so what quantities is he talking about if his ten pints equals 5 English gallons? By his calculations, that would be 2 pints to the English gallon)
A little Googling proved fascinating: English Wine Gallon. Today we don't think about the consequences of accurate measures too much, because we have them. But in the day, England taxed wine, for example, by the gallon. There darn well better be an agreed upon definition of a gallon -- which by the way, involves using pi since they needed the circumference and then the volume of a container plus the temperature of the room. And it turns out that the definition was a bit loosey-goosey. Merchants got a pit peeved to discover they'd been overpaying their tax.
And then I found This Page over at Wikipedia. Oh my God. This page is heaven for history geeks. There's a FLOW CHART! A league is three miles, and that is information I have long wished to know.
All right, so I got a little off topic, kind of, but there's a quite dramatic entry following the butter advice one, included below for your pleasure. One puzzle, though, is that this penultimate phrase of the first paragraph, they discover the secret, What the heck does that mean? Does anyone have a guess? Opine in the comments, please. I understand that he's saying a slattern will not keep the wooden dishes clean enough, but grammatically how does discovering a secret work into that? The secret of good butter? The secret of life? What?
238. Dr. Anderson's Method of keeping Milk and ButterDeath by butter. Now that's a turn of phrase.
The pernicious method of keeping milk in leaden vessels, and salting butter in stone jars, begins to gain ground in this country, as well as elsewhere, from an idea of cleanliness. The fact is, it is just the reverse of cleanliness ; for in the hands of a careful person, nothing can be more cleanly than wooden dishes, but under the management of a slattern, they discover the secret, which stone dishes do not.
In return, these latter communicate to the butter and the milk, which has been kept in them, a poisonous quality, which inevitably proves destructive to the human constitution. To the prevalence of this practice, I have no doubt (says the doctor) we must attribute the frequency of palsies, which begin to so much prevail in this kingdom ; for the well-known effect of the poison of lead is, bodily debility, palsy --- death!
Grave Matters
Now, last week I blogged about Handel's Messiah and its big premier in Dublin. This week marks another anniversary for Handel--the date he was interred at Westminster Abbey in 1759. I have one great enjoyment in life that strangely enough I have found non-history geeks and non-history readers think is a bit odd. I enjoy wandering around old cemeteries. I like reading the epitaphs and imagining how the people lived, I like deciphering antique symbols, and I even like visiting the resting places of historic figures I admire. I guess I think that by some kind of osmosis I can communicate with them (though that has never happened, and would scare the bezeesus out of me if it did)! There is no better cemetery for a history buff than Westminster Abbey. It's full of the great, near-great, famous, and people who just somehow had the pull to get themselves big tombs there when they died but no one knows them now. There are royals galore, scientists, artists of all sorts, politicans, all sorts.
On the Splendors of the Regency tour Diane and I went on a few years ago, we got to go to the Abbey (not as part of the tour, just as something to keep us busy when we first got there). Despite a torrential rainstorm as we tried to leave and my jet-lagged daze, it was an amazing experience just to wander around and find people I "knew" as well as look at the sites I remembered from royal wedding and coronation videos. I stood on top of the marker where Cromwell once was (before Charles II dug him up and hanged him), and cried at the elaborate tomb of Elizabeth I. Here are just a few of the luminaries you can see there:
Samuel Johnson, d. 1784 (who happens to be right next to Ben Jonson, d. 1637, and actor David Garrick, d. 1779)
Henry Purcell (d. 1695) and his wife Francisca
Poets' Corner, where you can find everyone from Chaucer to Olivier, and memorials to many who are buried elsewhere like Shakespeare and Eliot (it's quite crowded there)
Explorer David Livingstone (d. 1873)
Henry VII and his queen Elizabeth of York (in, appropriately, the Henry VII Chapel)
Also in the Henry VII Chapel, his granddaughter Elizabeth I (and Mary I, too, but only Elizabeth gets an effigy)
Eleanor of Castile, d. 1290 (I just think this effigy is so beautiful)
Edward the Confessor, d. 1066
Charles Darwin, d. 1882
Anne of Cleves, the only wife of Henry VIII to be buried at Westminster (d. 1557)
Frances Brandon Grey, Duchess of Suffolk, mother of the unfortunate Jane Grey (her youngest daughter Mary is buried with her)
Playwright Aphra Behn (d. 1689). Proof that wit can never be defense against mortality.
Margaret Beaufort, mother of Henry VII
She is right next to her great-granddaughter Mary, Queen of Scots, who has one of the biggest tombs in the place (put up by her son when he became James I)
And Elizabeth, Duchess of Northumberland, a famous hostess of her day who died in 1776--I think it's so gorgeous!
This is just the tiniest tip of the iceberg to the sites found in the Abbey. Have you been there? What are some of your favorites? And if you share my historical hobby, what are some great historical cemeteries you've visited?
Emery Lee Winner
Diane at Hillwood Museum
She arrived a couple of days before the Retreat, so we took advantage of beautiful weather and went to tour the Hillwood Museum. The museum is actually the house that Majorie Merriweather Post, heiress to the Post cereal fortune, built in DC as a place she could display her huge collection of art.
I've visited Hillwood several times and it always reminds me of an English country house, especially one built in the 1700s. In truth, it was built in modern times and inside there is art from all time periods, but, to me, it feels like a country house.
Here is the dining room:
And the drawing room.
Post's bedroom is a replica of a Robert Adam room, but they didn't have a postcard showing it (my inside photos are photos of postcards I purchased, because they didn't allow photography inside the house).
Marjorie Merriweather Post had marvelous collections of porcelain, among so many things, like pre-communist Russian religious vestments and icons.
And 18th century art, like this painting, L'Enfant Cheri by Marguerite Gerard.
Outside the house are beautifully kept gardens, in glorious bloom on this lovely spring day.
I never tire of visiting this place.
What about you? Do you have a favorite historic house or museum you could visit over and over again?
Wednesday on Diane's Blog, I'll tell you about Melissa's and my experiences at the WRW Retreat. My prize for that day will be a signed copy of The Diamonds of Welbourne Manor, which, of course, has Amanda's and Deb Marlowe's RITA finalist novellas...and my novella, too.
Debut Author Emery Lee and The Highest Stakes
Read what some reviewers say:
The Highest Stakes is a rich and rewarding read, with the history of
the times neatly sewn in. The real meat of the book, though, is its
relationships: not only between Charlotte and Robert, but between
Robert and Phillip Drake, and a handful of lesser players. Emery Lee
lays it out cleverly, sometimes humorously, with period sensibility
and restrained sensuality--A Historical Novel Review
Emery will give away a signed copy of The Highest Stakes to one lucky, randomly-chosen commenter.
Welcome to the Riskies, Emery! The Highest Stakes is your debut novel! Tell us about it.
The Highest Stakes is a tale of drama, danger, thwarted love, and retribution set in the high stakes gentleman's world of 18th century horseracing, when racing and breeding were the obsession of the uppermost elite, and a match race might replace a duel in settling a point of honor.
Charlotte Wallace leads a cold and lonely existence a sympathetic stable groom takes her under his wing and teaches her everything about horses and horseracing. Robert Devington's singular desire is to claim the girl he has loved since he first spied her riding hell-for-leather over the Doncaster heath, but these star-crossed lovers are destined to be thwarted at every turn. Determined to have Charlotte at any cost, Robert risks everything in a wager …for love.
Throughout this story the history of the English Thoroughbred is also told, from its creation by mares imported as part of a queen’s dowry, to the breed's perfection through the progeny of the Byerley Turk, the Darley Arabian, and the Godolphin Barb. From Doncaster's Cantley Common to Newmarket's Rowley Mile, and across the Atlantic to the American Colonies, the English blood horse emerges from the stables of the powerful elite to dominate the turf.
We love debut authors! Tell us about “The Call” when you found out someone wanted to publish your book.
Shockingly, The Highest Stakes is the first and only novel I have ever written, and it was begun at the tender age of forty-three! I wrote the novel during an extremely turbulent year that included the accidental deaths of four beloved animals, my father succumbing to lung cancer, and the loss of my job. Although the details are now hazy, I may have been in the process of sticking my head in the gas oven when “the call” came!
Seriously, “the call” came at a very pivotal moment in my life. I had finished The Highest Stakes with the intention of entering a major writing contest. I mailed off my manuscript with a kiss and a prayer that somehow my masterwork might fall into an admiring editor’s hands. Being a somewhat obsessive/compulsive woman of action, however, I couldn’t just sit and wait. I began firing off query letters to literary agents left and right, with rejections following on every last one of them. I then discovered two publishers who still accept unagented queries and decided to give it a go.
Deb Werksman at Sourcebooks replied with a request for the full manuscript, and called a couple of weeks later with an offer. I was thrilled…dumbstruck… and mostly terrified. I knew absolutely nothing about publishing, and needed someone experienced to guide me. I frantically emailed a group of author bloggers asking for help. One kind soul referred me to my present agent Kelly Mortimer of Mortimer Literary. The rest, as they say, is history.
What inspired you to write about horseracing and horses?
I have loved horses for as long as I can remember, and like most young girls, always dreamed of
owning my own. This dream came true at age thirteen, when I managed to save five hundred dollars and secure a steady baby-sitting job that paid just enough to cover the cost of board.
Since then, I have owned about thirteen different horses of various breeds. I have shown, trained my own mounts, and taught all of my family members to ride. These days my schedule only allows for pleasure riding, and I own two geldings, a gorgeous grey Arabian, and a palomino Quarter horse.
I have always heard that one should write what one knows. I also believe one should write about one’s passion. I know horses and they are one of my passions.
Did you come across anything in your research that surprised you?
Absolutely! I am such a geek that I have spent a great deal of my life researching things just for the fun of it – simply because something piqued my interest.
I admire horses, and have owned several different breeds. I am, however, most partial to the Arabian for his gentleness, beauty, and perhaps in part, to his ancient lineage. A long time ago, I learned that the thoroughbred racehorse actually descended from the Arabian. I was curious to learn more and began digging.
It was fascinating to learn that the Thoroughbred was created specifically for racing in 18th century England. Another little-known fact is that nearly all of the Thoroughbreds in existence can still trace their blood lines back to three specific Eastern bred stallions. This is how the premise of the novel came about.
Here at Risky Regencies we’re all about risky. What is risky about The Highest Stakes?
Although The Highest Stakes is unquestionably a love story, it is not at all in the traditional mode.
Although I am an unapologetic romantic who devours historical romance novels by the bucket load, I just knew that traditional romance was not my writing style. I have always been most drawn to stories with a darker side, heavily empathizing with the “tortured” characters in some my favorite novels - Rebecca, Jane Eyre, and Wuthering Heights. I also believe these kinds of characters work best with a foil. In my world, Robert Devington could not exist without Philip Drake.
My other “risks” were to attempt what I felt was a grand-scale love story with not one, but several antagonists, whose Machiavellian moves against Robert and Charlotte would tug on the readers’ heartstrings. Lastly, I wanted to tap into the excitement and adventure of horseracing.
Although these elements are seemingly at odds, I hope my readers will find it a winning combination.
What’s next for you?
Professionally speaking -
Although The Highest Stakes is already a big read, I can’t help feeling the story is still only half told! I am very pleased to say that Sourcebooks recently concurred with me, and the second novel is well under way. Fortune's Son (Philip Drake’s story), should be released late 2011.
On a more personal note –
I am celebrating the publication of my first novel by realizing a lifelong ambition - to attend The Kentucky Derby. I’ll see y’all soon at Churchill Downs!
Are you ready for a good horse story? Did you devour horse books as a child? Ask Emery questions or make a comment for a chance to win a signed copy of The Highest Stakes.
X+Y=Sizzle!
Adele's "My Same":
You said I'm stubborn and I never give in
I think you're stubborn 'cept you're always softening
You say I'm selfish, I agree with you on that
I think you're giving out in way too much in fact
I say we've only known each other a year
You say I've known you longer my dear
You like to be so close, I like to be alone
I like to sit on chairs and you prefer the floor
Walking with each other, think we'll never match at all, but we do
But we do, but we do, but we do
I thought I knew myself, somehow you know me more
I've never known this, never before
You're the first to make up whenever we argue
I don't know who I'd be if I didn't know you
You're so provocative, I'm so conservative
You're so adventurous, I'm so very cautious, combining
You think we would and we do, but we do, but we do, but we do
Adele says it better than I, but the point of this song, and therefore this post, is that some couples work, even though it seems like they shouldn't, and some don't, even though it seems like they should.
Some of the best books, in my opinion, are where the author is able to convince you--and her characters--that even though there are distinct differences in personality, a true HEA is, indeed, possible. And watching the hero and heroine mash out their conflict during the course of the book is the most fun of all.
Take, for example, almost any of Loretta Chase's books: In Lord of Scoundrels, for example, it seems as though Dain and Jessica are the least likely pair EVER to fall in love. But she figures out that there's depth behind the big lummox, and he realizes he is, indeed, worthy of such a lovely creature as Jessica (and that she likes him), and their HEA is totally and completely believable.
Or, for a more extreme example, Anne Stuart's books; often, the hero or the heroine's stated goal at the outset of the book is to kill the other. You can't find an action further away from falling in love than that. But, eventually, they put aside their initial goal because they have gotten to know each other and usually been forced to work together for some greater good (or bad).
I thought of this because (and Diane, you might want to look away), just based on the ads, I don't at all buy the idea of Gerard Butler and Jennifer Aniston as a couple in The Bounty Hunter. And that kind of believability happens in the gut: There's no way to figure out what combination of folks will make us believe in the HEA, worse luck for Hollywood.
In plotting and writing my books, I have to cast actors in the roles, or I don't believe what I'm writing. So I've thought a lot about combinations that work, despite themselves--for example, even though they seem very comfortable together, I don't think Spencer Tracy and Katharine Hepburn were a particularly sizzling pair. That is opposed to Humphrey Bogart and Lauren Bacall, who sizzled all over the place, despite the Hays Code (restrictions on film content, following such films as Barbara Stanwyck's Baby Face and Mae West's I'm No Angel).
In modern film, one of the sexiest pairings is Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt in Mr. And Mrs. Smith. Whoa. George Clooney and Jennifer Lopez in Out Of Sight? Also totally buy it, and they obviously never had an off-screen romance. Pride & Prejudice convinced me as to the pairings of Colin Firth and Jennifer Ehle and Keira Knightley and Matthew Macfadyen. Even Greer Garson and Laurence Olivier were believable in the much maligned 1940 version.
Who are your favorite 'shouldn't work but they do' couples, either in books or film? What pairing absolutely did not work for you?
Megan