History Detectives/Romance Heroines


When I was a kid, my parents had a beautiful coffee table book about Great Archaeological Sites of the World. I was totally fascinated by it, spent hours poring over photos of the Valley of the Kings, the Parthenon, Newgrange, Scandinavian bog bodies, etc. Somehow I became convinced there was Viking treasure in our backyard (because the Vikings could have sailed a longship into the desert of Albuquerque, right?), and set up my own dig in our backyard. My parents weren't too happy I tore up our precious patch of grass, but our dogs were able assistants in the digging process. They even unearthed some bones, though they sadly proved to be old Nylabones they themselves buried and not the remains of Viking warriors.

I've never quite lost that fascination with archaeology and the ancient world. So, I was very happy to meet the heroines of my new Regency series, "The Muses of Mayfair." The Chase sisters are the daughters of a renowned scholar and antiquarian, who named his children after the Greek Muses. Calliope, Clio, and Thalia aren't content with just inspiring people, though--they're passionate scholars in their own right. And their romances take place against the backdrop of antiquities and archeological skullduggery.

In Book One, To Catch a Rogue, we met the eldest Muse Calliope, who suspected Cameron de Vere, Earl of Westwood, of being London's infamous Lily Thief and determined to catch him out. A bit of a nuisance when she fell in love with him, then...

Book Two, To Deceive a Duke, is Clio's story, and is out in the UK this month! Clio is the most fiery and independent of the Chase Muses, and her love for the mysterious Duke of Averton is just as unpredictable. They parted on, shall we say, less than amiable terms in To Catch a Rogue. Now they meet again on an archaeological dig in sun-blasted Sicily, where Clio is set on saving a fabulous collection of Hellenistic silver (based on the famous Morgantina Hoard). Is the duke on her side, allied with her against a host of dangerous villains? Or is he, too, out to steal the silver--and destroy her in the process?

Book Three, Thalia's story To Kiss a Count (set in Bath) will be out later this year. And all 3 will be released in the US, in consecutive months, in 2010! I am so excited about that.

To win a copy of To Decieve a Duke, go to Nicola Cornick's website and check out our joint contest! TDAD can also be ordered from Amazon.uk and Harlequin Mills and Boon.

What were some of your favorite childhood passions? Have any favorite archeological sites? And what color satin dress do you think Thalia will show up in on her cover? (I also call this series "The Bridesmaid Muses," since they appear to have escaped from a pastel-hued wedding party! I vote for pale blue...)

Let's Talk About Sex, Baby



Last night, my nine year-old son and I were watching the Simpsons, and there was a pun involving an erection.

D'oh!

The Son: Mommy, what's an erection?
Me: Gasp.
Me: Um, let me see in what context. [rewind to see. Yup, it means what I think it means.] Gulp.
Son: You don't have to say (he's seen my face, and is worried he said something wrong).
Me: No, it's fine. An erection--deep breath--is when a boy or man's penis gets hard.
Son: Oh. Oh, I'm sorry. Oh. Okay. [he is now way more embarrassed than I could ever be].
So, yeah, my first foray into the Facts of Life. And, since I was stuck on what topic to write about today, kind fellow Twitter-er Andrea Pickens suggested I talk about teaching sex in the Regency.

Uh . . . basically, country-born kids who weren't idiots could figure out, through observation, that their parts worked similarly to the farm animals around them (and perhaps gave rise to the first utterance of "hung like a horse?"). But what about city-raised or particularly obtuse kids?

Then, perhaps, it was up to the parents.

I learned about the machinations of sex through reading my mom's salacious books. The Regency Miss (or Mister) didn't have Rosemary Rogers (or adult magazines) to help, however, so then it was up to the same sex parent to explain. And you can bet that some parents didn't explain at all, either because they were embarrassed, or didn't care, or whatever.

Can you imagine what would happen the first time?



We've talked about it before, but given all this, it seems as though our heroes and heroines, if they're virgins, know a lot more than they likely would have. But then again, it is romantic fiction. If it were literary fiction, perhaps the author would show all the awkwardness and fumbling; we just show the bliss.

Who explained it all to you? Or did you read about it, like me? What is the silliest sex myth you've ever heard?

Thanks!

Megan

Making yourself write

... and liking it, by golly.

I'm the last person I thought would be blogging on the writer's life (whatever that is), but I got such lovely responses last week from my blog about putting back the joy I thought I'd continue in the same vein.

So, today I started making my list of things to do. This is my alleged writing day when I don't go into the day job. Funnily enough it fills up with all sorts of oddities--purely because I let it, but also it's unrealistic for me to sit down at my desk and write for eight hours or so straight. I know some people can do it, but even when I was in my writing addiction phase I'd, oh, you know, take bathroom breaks, eat, drink tea.

So the other things on my list today were as follows:

Help local chapter find workshop location. Done.

Reschedule storm door installation. Possibly done.

Don't drink too much coffee. It's my latest treat. I may have some decaff later.

Do laundry. Done.

Tame shoes.
Bought online, hurt me although they look incredibly comfortable, can't return them, but I love the look of them. So I'm wearing a strange assortment of socks and liners.

Rip up carpeting on basement stairs. Postpone. I know it will become a massive job for unforeseen factors--cleaning, pulling up every single tack, discovering that a new paint job is needed, picking the paint color, painting (at least two coats) spending hours on eBay looking for substitute carpeting... oh, sorry, this is about writing, isn't it?

We are all blessed with a zillion distractions.

I think it's a question of finding a rhythm that suits you, whether you use a kitchen timer, unplug your internet connection (oops, I have wireless), or use a rewards system. Don't stress it because you know you'll get stuck in a morass of agony--oh my god, I've been online for an hour following link after link...

Make it a pleasant experience--my office is the warmest room in the house and that's a definite plus. I have a nice selection of music. I can look out of the window. And most important, I can shut the door.

I limit my online access but I must share with you the following links. This is the funniest complaint about online food, with pictures, that I've seen. And talking of the undead, check this out--the latest Jane Austen, uh, tribute (thanks to Smart Bitches for the link). And the Cake Wrecks blog is always a joy.

What are your tricks for keeping writing or doing whatever must be done and which should be, but isn't always, its own reward? Do you use bribery (if I write X thousand words then I can...) or teeth-gritting or what?

Do share!

Wednesday Guest Blogger Andrea Pickens


Hello everyone! First of all, I know everyone joins me in sending our love to Elena and her family, along with best wishes for her husband's speedy recovery. I've big shoes to fill, but I'm honored the Riskies have invited me to guest blog today. It's always such fun to be part of the lively exchange of ideas here!

Recently, I've been thinking a lot about not just the written word but the spoken word. I wasn't one of those kids who went out for school plays, so when my editor at Grand Central Publishing asked me to do a podcast on why I love the Regency era, I was more than a little nervous. And then, on top of that, I was asked to be part of a romance reading in New York City next week. Gulp. Speak aloud? Read from my books? The sweat was already trickling down my spine.

Writing the podcast was easy--then I started to practice saying it aloud. The first attempt came out as a croak. The second herky-jerky stumbling. Finally, I was able to get through it without too many hitches. But now, that reading awaits, and I've started another round of practice. For those who haven't tried it, reading aloud isn't easy! Oh, mumbling the words doesn't take much effort, but to capture the mood and nuances of the story, to make the characters come alive, is a daunting challenge. It made me realize how, with CDs, DVDs, TV, I-pods, and the Internet to keep ourselves amused, reading aloud is pretty much a lost art.

Of course, that wasn't so in the Regency. Just look at the novels of Jane Austen to see countless examples of how the practice was woven into the fabric of everyday life. Fanny Price, like so many poor relations and paid companions, was expected to keep her aunt's boredom at bay by reading to her. The Bennet sisters had to sit through Mr. Collins's pompous readings of religious texts.

We're also constantly reminded of how one of the main sources of evening entertainment for a family was reading a novel together after dinner, with each family member taking a turn. Poetry was also popular--though I imagine not many parents allowed their daughters to recite Byron's Don Juan aloud!

The more I thought about it, the more I realized the oral tradition of storytelling has been part of the human experience since the dawn of civilization. Starting with the ancient Mesopotamian Epic of Gilgamesh, which dates from around 2000 BC, where we see the archetypal theme of "hero and quest"--ha, you see, romance was at the root of our imagination even then! This continues with Beowulf and epic Greek poems like The Illiad and The Odyssey.

The Middle Ages saw the rise of the troubadour tradition, which combined epic poetry and song. The French courts developed the idea of Courtly Love, and Eleanor of Aquitaine brought this tradition to England when she married Henry II. During this time we also see the rise of the Arthurian legends. Love, honor, jealousy, sex, betrayal--the romance is heating up!

Dante, Milton...I could go on and on, but fast-forward to today, where the idea of going and listenting to someone reading aloud seems something of an oddity, a quaint, old-fashioned throwback to the past. I suppose that audio books are the closest thing we have to the oral tradition.

But back to my own experience. After practicing until I'm blue in the face, I have come to two realizations. One--I made a wise career choice in steering away from the performing arts. Two--much as I want to like listenting to stories, I still prefer to read them. I'm one of those people who just doesn't follow a narrative well by listening. It seems to go in one ear and out the other. My mind wanders--I forget what I heard--a particular voice isn't my idea of the character. I need to see the words on the page (yes, I still prefer books to e-readers!) to go at my own pace, to hear my own voices for the characters.

What about you? Do you enjoy both? Can you absorb both?

What are some favorite stories for hearing aloud?

Andrea will be reading, along with Hope Tarr, at 7:00 pm on February 2, at Madame X, 94 West Houston Street! More details here

Jane Austen Mad Libs


Did you do Mad Libs as a kid? I certainly did. I loved how the random words we all submitted turned into wacky stories.

I didn't know until recently that they were still published, but they are! So I was happily able to buy my nephew some Star Wars Mad Libs recently...

Now, just for the heck of it, I'm going to try to do one myself: a Jane Austen Mad Lib.

So: please suggest words that fit the following categories, and then later today I'll post the finished version!

ABSTRACT IDEA:
ADVERB:
KIND OF PERSON:
POSSESSION:
MEMBER OF FAMILY OR HOUSEHOLD:
DEGREE/EXTENT:
PLURAL NOUN:
ANOTHER PLURAL NOUN:
PLACE:
GROUP OF HUMANS:
ANOTHER MEMBER OF FAMILY OR HOUSEHOLD:

So just suggest as many as you like, and I will take a random assortment of suggestions, and we'll see what we get!

And don't forget: next Tuesday, we'll be discussing the Leslie Howard version of THE SCARLET PIMPERNEL!


Cara
Cara King, who owns many plural nouns

And the Award Goes To...Who?

No, this isn't a post about the SAG Awards. I'll leave that to Amanda, our resident fashionista, but I will say that the dresses were much better than the Golden Globes, except for Meryl Streep, whose daughter looks just like her but was better dressed. Angelina Jolie managed to look frumpy.

What I'm really blogging about is judging contests. This is Romance's season of contests and lots of us will be judging contests, the RITAs (Romance Writers of America's awards for published books), the Golden Heart (RWA's unpublished manuscript contest), and RWA Chapter contests.

I'm judging the RITAs right now and just dipped into my first entry. I have seven books in a variety of categories, mostly Series romance, which I hardly ever read on my own. I decided to start with the ones I least wanted to read and, lo and behold, I really liked the first book I picked up.

Here are my personal criteria to judge The RITAs. This would work for the Golden Heart, too.

9 - I'd really like this enty to win
8 - I wouldn't mind this entry winning
7 - This is very good, but it shouldn't win
6 - This is above average
5 - This is competently written but it is just average
4 - This is below average; it has some problems
3 - This has even more problems
2 - This one is very flawed
1 - I can't imagine scoring a 1 - it would have to be incoherent.

I start out with the premise that I'm picking up a winner, then tick off "points" if I discover problems or if the story ultimately disappoints me.

I also thought a bit about what it is that makes me like a book:

1. It makes me care about the characters. In this book, I didn't like the hero much at first, but he did intrigue me and that was enough. He changed into a character I did like.

2. The characters feel like real people, not cliches. These characters were familiar "types" but the author succeeded in giving them a fresh look.

3. I want to keep reading. I didn't want to put this book down.

4. Everything makes sense. The characters' motivations, how they behave, what happens, all makes sense; nothing feels contrived. Nothing happens that makes me feel, "Naw. That ain't right."

5. The pacing seems right. Too often we speed up at the story's end and it can feel rushed. This one did pretty good. This book strayed a teensy bit from my ideal. Not much though.

6. Nothing stops me and makes me have to go back to figure it out. In this case, I had to go back for one detail, but that was all.

This book will get high marks from me and it encourages me to read the next one on my list.

How about you? What makes a book or a contest entry a winner to you? What are your criteria? Even if you are primarily a reader, you know what makes a good book.

Contests have been very kind to me. I sold my first book entirely because of the Golden Heart and I won Romance's highest award, the RITA the second time I entered for A Reputable Rake. (That's me with the Mills & Boon editors in Atlanta, 2007)

What contests are you entering?


There is still time to enter my contest. And come visit the Wet Noodle Posse for more tips on how to be good to yourself.

Regal Fashions


Last Tuesday, of course, was finally the inauguration of President Obama! I watched TV all day, and besides the speeches and music and oaths, I wanted to see who wore what. (Shallow of me, I know, but it seems I was not alone--when I googled "Michelle Obama inauguration clothes" I found millions of hits!). I thought she looked great, both in the Isabel Toledo lemony-yellow dress and coat and the floaty white goddess gown by young New York designer Jason Wu. Elegant and appropriate, without being stuffy or dowdy (though I did not care for those green shoes!). Malia and Sasha Obama were adorable--I must get an orange scarf to go with my pink coat, immediately.












I have to say, though, my favorite outfits of the day belonged to Jill Biden. The red coat and groovy boots, the red chiffon Reem Acra gown--gorgeous. I love the way these women are making it not only fine, but fashionable, to be both smart and serious and have fun with clothes!

It made me wonder--what did some of the great ladies of history wear for their coronations? What I found: lots of white satin, gold embroidery, purple velvet, and ermine! I saw none of that on Tuesday...





Elizabeth I (January 15, 1559)



Marie Antoinette (I could not actually find a portrait; it was described as white satin, embroidered with gold thread, pearls, and sapphires. The date was June 11, 1775)

Queen Charlotte (September 22, 1761--she had just been married on September 8)

Empress Josephine (December 2, 1804)

Queen Victoria (June 28, 1838)



Tsarina Alexandra (May 14, 1896)




Elizabeth II (June 2, 1953--gown by Norman Hartnell, who also did her wedding dress in 1947. The embroidery is emblems of the British Empire)


If you were going to a coronation or an inauguration, what would you wear???

A View To A Kill



Sometime they'll give a war and nobody will come.

Carl Sandburg (1878 - 1967), The People, Yes (1936)

Okay, so I've had this bee in my bonnet since finishing Bernard Cornwell's Rebel a few weeks ago:

What is it with people going out to watch battles being waged, as though it's a Cirque de Soleil performance or something?


In Rebel, a bunch of politicians from the North go to watch their Yankees beat the Rebels (yeah, it's a Civil War book) and bring their wives. The Southern ladies also set up a spot from which to watch the fighting.

And in some Regencies, and in Cornwell's Sharpe series, people go watch the battle. I just don't get it. Like, not get it so much that it's really bugging me.

Why would anyone want to go watch people die? Why treat it as an exhibition? What happens if your side loses and the victors decide they want some of your lovely fried chicken? Or if you distract someone fighting so they lose an eye or something worse?

I know it's a small thing, but I just cannot fathom how this even came to be. Not that there weren't observers at these types of battles; journalists often came to write up the proceedings for their papers. But dilettante viewers?!?

But because I am a writer, I wonder how the fact of observing battle could be turned into a fun or provocative book: What if a woman watched and learned how to fight? Then joined up herself, in drag? What if someone saw one soldier kill his commander in the heat of the battle--but no-one else saw? What if the observers saw a way, because of their position, for their side to win if they had some crucial information?

What would you never want to see in person? What have you always wanted to see for real? How could you imagine a Regency lady would react to seeing this carnage? What other scenarios for fiction could you imagine?

Thanks, and I am really glad to get this off my chest,

Megan

Byron, birthdays, and putting back the joy

Happy birthday, Byron, 221 years old today! I'm blogging about him on Delle Jacobs' In Search of Heroes blog today (or possibly later today, as Blogger has been a bad boy--doubtless in Byron's honor--and Delle and I are three hours apart), so come on over and visit.

It's also the birthday of my dad, the Old Man who is not a Tree, who is a mere 98 years old. He was born the year the Titanic sank. He remembers traveling alone on a train when he was very small, and being given chocolate by soldiers on their way to the front in World War One. I'm sorry I don't have a digital image of him.

A few weeks ago, at the beginning of the new year, we talked about various things we intended to do this year, and one of the big issues that a lot of us were interested in was how to put the joy back in writing. I suspect that this could cover several posts, but I'll get the ball rolling here. And not only writing--this could apply to any sort of creative endeavor, something to which you've made a commitment but which now seems stale.

Let me get personal on you here. When I first started writing, it was an amazing experience. I'd come home from work and produce a few thousand words every evening, more on the weekends--I wrote 14k words one weekend. I'm not saying they were good words, but they were prolific and they were there, and that's half the battle. I dreamed and daydreamed about my characters. I wrote whole scenes in my head and typed them up, word for word. My subconscious kicked in at the drop of a hat. I developed a sort of ritual of placing my fingertips on the keyboard and breathing. Then I wrote and wrote. My mantra at the time was just do it (not very original, but it worked).

Smugly, I acknowledged that I wasn't one of those writers--the ones who were always complaining about having to write and doing anything--housework, even--to avoid writing.

And then I became one of those writers. What happened?

Part of the problem (don't kill me, please) was getting published. For one thing, it's really easy to get all tied up in the niceties of marketing and promotion. If you want to get some perspective on this, read this article by Julie Ann Long on the Tao of Publishing, based on the presentation she and her agent made at nationals in San Francisco last year. I realized fairly recently (duh) that the success of your book (in print publishing, at least) is determined by your print run, a number chosen by your publisher and completely outside your control. Unless you're one of the rare exceptions and your book takes off, with or without your efforts, leading to multiple print runs, you won't make the bestseller lists.

Also, once you're published, you find yourself up against all sorts of expectations, or perceived expectations--those of your readers, your agent, your editor. You must keep writing about the Regency, you must write the same sort of books; yes, you may long to write about reindeer breeders in fifth century Lapland, but at the moment it's just Not Hot, so write it in your spare time. (What spare time?! I'm too busy blogging, pricing promotional items online, googling myself, and handing out bookmarks to strangers!)

Also something from the past may come to bite you on the ass as we say in the Regency. In my case, it was something I heard all the time during my formative years: that if you enjoy doing something, you won't like it if you do it as a job. This is in direct contrast to the mantra of the 1980s (and beyond?) that you should do something you love and the money will come.

I did my best to disprove the family theory by doing jobs that I did indeed love, but writing was a different matter, and I had to really struggle with this. One thing that helped was looking at the theory in perspective; this was the theory of my parents and their generation. At least three of them wanted to be professional musicians but found that circumstances--being the only one in the family with a job during the Great Depression, World War II--made it impossible for them to fulfil their dream. One of them was talked out of it by her jealous sister. And musicians generally have to grab the opportunity at a time when they're at the peak of their physical dexterity and mental alertness; a year or two can make all the difference.

Whereas writers... well, I was a late bloomer. I'm not someone who wanted to be a writer all their life. I'm not making any great claims to mental alertness either, but it's a different process.

And the bottom line--I refuse to accept this theory that was drummed into me along with other dubious advice from my family. I will trust my instincts (a good rule for writing too).

That helped, and strangely enough, just writing--just doing it--helps. I finished my revisions for A Most Lamentable Comedy (August, 2009), and that helped me get back into the swing. I'm started a new partial, and that's always fun, by participating in a BIAW (book in a week) with my local chapter. My agent told me she liked my idea for my next Little Black Dress book (I posted a short excerpt last week). Oh, and I got an advance check, and that always cheers me up, even if I've spent it several times already. I've decided early what I'm going to do for promotion in August so I can concentrate on writing now.

So yes, you can put the joy back in. I feel it's presumptious to give advice to people without contracts, but I will say that now is when you can get really good at writing; hone your voice; play around with different conventions and historical periods. Have fun. Build inventory, because you may be the one who introduces romance's next trend, hot love among the reindeer herds in fifth century Lapland. Determine to have fun throughout the process. Rejections--and I get a lot, honestly, still--are an evolutionary process to find the house and agent who are right for you and your style.

So what do you think?

J.A. Evening Winners!


The winners of the prizes that accompanied Tuesday's Jane Austen Evening post are:

Maddie

and

Santa!

Maddie & Santa, please send your info to me at riskies@yahoo.com, and I'll email you your prize choices... :-)


Cara & the Riskies

Some Sad News


Elena will be away from the blog for a while. Her husband is ill and facing a long recovery. Elena's time needs to be spent tending to him and to her children. While she is away we'll be tapping guest bloggers to fill in for her on Wednesdays.

Please share your support for Elena here. We're not asking her to respond, but we know that your good wishes and prayers will lift her spirits.

Thanks so much from the Riskies

Emily Bryan Winner!

The winner of Vexing the Viscount is...Eva S! Congratulations! Please send your info to us at riskies@yahoo.com

Jane Austen Evening 2009, and Prizes!



First off, I would like to welcome any newcomers or visitors to the blog! Risky Regencies is a light-hearted community of Regency writers and Regency fans, and we provide great discussions on everything from the merits of the 1995 miniseries of Pride and Prejudice to rereading Georgette Heyer.

Now, to today's subject: the 2009 Jane Austen Evening, which I attended this past Saturday!

(In fact, I enjoyed it so very much, that I shall be giving away two Regency-themed prizes to lucky commenters today! Just comment on this post by Wednesday night, and you'll be entered to win a DVD of the Rintoul/Garvie version of Pride and Prejudice, or the guidebook to the Bath Museum of Costume, or a book on Sarah Siddons, or another prize of your choice!)

I have now attended something like six Jane Austen Evenings, and it seems to me they get better every year.

As always, it was held in a gorgeous location (as these photos attest!)

First, we had a Regency tea, with as much scrumptious period food as one could eat, plus a variety of teas.

My favorite food this year was the sweet rosemary shortbread -- I went back for more.

And more...

And more... (Oh, it was heavenly!)

I think every year, the costumes are better, and the dancers more experienced.

And this year, it seemed to me that the costumes weren't only fabulous, but that nearly everyone was in some sort of costume.

There were moments when one could truly picture oneself back in Jane Austen's time!

(Though the cameras, I suppose, were a tiny bit anachronistic.) ;-)

Then again, with so many amazing costumes, who could blame those of us who took photos?

(And more photos!)

(And still more!)

(In fact, I took so many, that I had to do two blog posts today to hold them all...)

I even brought a camcorder this time -- though I've yet to see how my taping turned out!

(If it turned out well, then I'm going to upload some of it to youtube, just as Jane Austen would have done herself.)

Then, after all the splendid tea, we danced all night.

(My feet were killing me by the end!)

So: if you want to comment on this post, feel free to answer any or all of the following questions:

Did you attend the Jane Austen Evening? What did you think? Which was your favorite part? (Your favorite food, or dance, or costume?)

If you didn't attend it, which part sounds the most alluring?

Which is your favorite photo?

Have you ever attended a similar event?

All comments welcome!

(And if you want to see my posts on previous Jane Austen Evenings and Playford Balls, just click the link below that says "Jane Austen Evening.")


Cara
Cara King, author of MY LADY GAMESTER and dancer of Maggots




 
2005-2008 © Risky Regencies
Designed by Enchanted Web Style