History Detectives/Romance Heroines


When I was a kid, my parents had a beautiful coffee table book about Great Archaeological Sites of the World. I was totally fascinated by it, spent hours poring over photos of the Valley of the Kings, the Parthenon, Newgrange, Scandinavian bog bodies, etc. Somehow I became convinced there was Viking treasure in our backyard (because the Vikings could have sailed a longship into the desert of Albuquerque, right?), and set up my own dig in our backyard. My parents weren't too happy I tore up our precious patch of grass, but our dogs were able assistants in the digging process. They even unearthed some bones, though they sadly proved to be old Nylabones they themselves buried and not the remains of Viking warriors.

I've never quite lost that fascination with archaeology and the ancient world. So, I was very happy to meet the heroines of my new Regency series, "The Muses of Mayfair." The Chase sisters are the daughters of a renowned scholar and antiquarian, who named his children after the Greek Muses. Calliope, Clio, and Thalia aren't content with just inspiring people, though--they're passionate scholars in their own right. And their romances take place against the backdrop of antiquities and archeological skullduggery.

In Book One, To Catch a Rogue, we met the eldest Muse Calliope, who suspected Cameron de Vere, Earl of Westwood, of being London's infamous Lily Thief and determined to catch him out. A bit of a nuisance when she fell in love with him, then...

Book Two, To Deceive a Duke, is Clio's story, and is out in the UK this month! Clio is the most fiery and independent of the Chase Muses, and her love for the mysterious Duke of Averton is just as unpredictable. They parted on, shall we say, less than amiable terms in To Catch a Rogue. Now they meet again on an archaeological dig in sun-blasted Sicily, where Clio is set on saving a fabulous collection of Hellenistic silver (based on the famous Morgantina Hoard). Is the duke on her side, allied with her against a host of dangerous villains? Or is he, too, out to steal the silver--and destroy her in the process?

Book Three, Thalia's story To Kiss a Count (set in Bath) will be out later this year. And all 3 will be released in the US, in consecutive months, in 2010! I am so excited about that.

To win a copy of To Decieve a Duke, go to Nicola Cornick's website and check out our joint contest! TDAD can also be ordered from Amazon.uk and Harlequin Mills and Boon.

What were some of your favorite childhood passions? Have any favorite archeological sites? And what color satin dress do you think Thalia will show up in on her cover? (I also call this series "The Bridesmaid Muses," since they appear to have escaped from a pastel-hued wedding party! I vote for pale blue...)

Let's Talk About Sex, Baby



Last night, my nine year-old son and I were watching the Simpsons, and there was a pun involving an erection.

D'oh!

The Son: Mommy, what's an erection?
Me: Gasp.
Me: Um, let me see in what context. [rewind to see. Yup, it means what I think it means.] Gulp.
Son: You don't have to say (he's seen my face, and is worried he said something wrong).
Me: No, it's fine. An erection--deep breath--is when a boy or man's penis gets hard.
Son: Oh. Oh, I'm sorry. Oh. Okay. [he is now way more embarrassed than I could ever be].
So, yeah, my first foray into the Facts of Life. And, since I was stuck on what topic to write about today, kind fellow Twitter-er Andrea Pickens suggested I talk about teaching sex in the Regency.

Uh . . . basically, country-born kids who weren't idiots could figure out, through observation, that their parts worked similarly to the farm animals around them (and perhaps gave rise to the first utterance of "hung like a horse?"). But what about city-raised or particularly obtuse kids?

Then, perhaps, it was up to the parents.

I learned about the machinations of sex through reading my mom's salacious books. The Regency Miss (or Mister) didn't have Rosemary Rogers (or adult magazines) to help, however, so then it was up to the same sex parent to explain. And you can bet that some parents didn't explain at all, either because they were embarrassed, or didn't care, or whatever.

Can you imagine what would happen the first time?



We've talked about it before, but given all this, it seems as though our heroes and heroines, if they're virgins, know a lot more than they likely would have. But then again, it is romantic fiction. If it were literary fiction, perhaps the author would show all the awkwardness and fumbling; we just show the bliss.

Who explained it all to you? Or did you read about it, like me? What is the silliest sex myth you've ever heard?

Thanks!

Megan

Making yourself write

... and liking it, by golly.

I'm the last person I thought would be blogging on the writer's life (whatever that is), but I got such lovely responses last week from my blog about putting back the joy I thought I'd continue in the same vein.

So, today I started making my list of things to do. This is my alleged writing day when I don't go into the day job. Funnily enough it fills up with all sorts of oddities--purely because I let it, but also it's unrealistic for me to sit down at my desk and write for eight hours or so straight. I know some people can do it, but even when I was in my writing addiction phase I'd, oh, you know, take bathroom breaks, eat, drink tea.

So the other things on my list today were as follows:

Help local chapter find workshop location. Done.

Reschedule storm door installation. Possibly done.

Don't drink too much coffee. It's my latest treat. I may have some decaff later.

Do laundry. Done.

Tame shoes.
Bought online, hurt me although they look incredibly comfortable, can't return them, but I love the look of them. So I'm wearing a strange assortment of socks and liners.

Rip up carpeting on basement stairs. Postpone. I know it will become a massive job for unforeseen factors--cleaning, pulling up every single tack, discovering that a new paint job is needed, picking the paint color, painting (at least two coats) spending hours on eBay looking for substitute carpeting... oh, sorry, this is about writing, isn't it?

We are all blessed with a zillion distractions.

I think it's a question of finding a rhythm that suits you, whether you use a kitchen timer, unplug your internet connection (oops, I have wireless), or use a rewards system. Don't stress it because you know you'll get stuck in a morass of agony--oh my god, I've been online for an hour following link after link...

Make it a pleasant experience--my office is the warmest room in the house and that's a definite plus. I have a nice selection of music. I can look out of the window. And most important, I can shut the door.

I limit my online access but I must share with you the following links. This is the funniest complaint about online food, with pictures, that I've seen. And talking of the undead, check this out--the latest Jane Austen, uh, tribute (thanks to Smart Bitches for the link). And the Cake Wrecks blog is always a joy.

What are your tricks for keeping writing or doing whatever must be done and which should be, but isn't always, its own reward? Do you use bribery (if I write X thousand words then I can...) or teeth-gritting or what?

Do share!

Wednesday Guest Blogger Andrea Pickens


Hello everyone! First of all, I know everyone joins me in sending our love to Elena and her family, along with best wishes for her husband's speedy recovery. I've big shoes to fill, but I'm honored the Riskies have invited me to guest blog today. It's always such fun to be part of the lively exchange of ideas here!

Recently, I've been thinking a lot about not just the written word but the spoken word. I wasn't one of those kids who went out for school plays, so when my editor at Grand Central Publishing asked me to do a podcast on why I love the Regency era, I was more than a little nervous. And then, on top of that, I was asked to be part of a romance reading in New York City next week. Gulp. Speak aloud? Read from my books? The sweat was already trickling down my spine.

Writing the podcast was easy--then I started to practice saying it aloud. The first attempt came out as a croak. The second herky-jerky stumbling. Finally, I was able to get through it without too many hitches. But now, that reading awaits, and I've started another round of practice. For those who haven't tried it, reading aloud isn't easy! Oh, mumbling the words doesn't take much effort, but to capture the mood and nuances of the story, to make the characters come alive, is a daunting challenge. It made me realize how, with CDs, DVDs, TV, I-pods, and the Internet to keep ourselves amused, reading aloud is pretty much a lost art.

Of course, that wasn't so in the Regency. Just look at the novels of Jane Austen to see countless examples of how the practice was woven into the fabric of everyday life. Fanny Price, like so many poor relations and paid companions, was expected to keep her aunt's boredom at bay by reading to her. The Bennet sisters had to sit through Mr. Collins's pompous readings of religious texts.

We're also constantly reminded of how one of the main sources of evening entertainment for a family was reading a novel together after dinner, with each family member taking a turn. Poetry was also popular--though I imagine not many parents allowed their daughters to recite Byron's Don Juan aloud!

The more I thought about it, the more I realized the oral tradition of storytelling has been part of the human experience since the dawn of civilization. Starting with the ancient Mesopotamian Epic of Gilgamesh, which dates from around 2000 BC, where we see the archetypal theme of "hero and quest"--ha, you see, romance was at the root of our imagination even then! This continues with Beowulf and epic Greek poems like The Illiad and The Odyssey.

The Middle Ages saw the rise of the troubadour tradition, which combined epic poetry and song. The French courts developed the idea of Courtly Love, and Eleanor of Aquitaine brought this tradition to England when she married Henry II. During this time we also see the rise of the Arthurian legends. Love, honor, jealousy, sex, betrayal--the romance is heating up!

Dante, Milton...I could go on and on, but fast-forward to today, where the idea of going and listenting to someone reading aloud seems something of an oddity, a quaint, old-fashioned throwback to the past. I suppose that audio books are the closest thing we have to the oral tradition.

But back to my own experience. After practicing until I'm blue in the face, I have come to two realizations. One--I made a wise career choice in steering away from the performing arts. Two--much as I want to like listenting to stories, I still prefer to read them. I'm one of those people who just doesn't follow a narrative well by listening. It seems to go in one ear and out the other. My mind wanders--I forget what I heard--a particular voice isn't my idea of the character. I need to see the words on the page (yes, I still prefer books to e-readers!) to go at my own pace, to hear my own voices for the characters.

What about you? Do you enjoy both? Can you absorb both?

What are some favorite stories for hearing aloud?

Andrea will be reading, along with Hope Tarr, at 7:00 pm on February 2, at Madame X, 94 West Houston Street! More details here

Jane Austen Mad Libs


Did you do Mad Libs as a kid? I certainly did. I loved how the random words we all submitted turned into wacky stories.

I didn't know until recently that they were still published, but they are! So I was happily able to buy my nephew some Star Wars Mad Libs recently...

Now, just for the heck of it, I'm going to try to do one myself: a Jane Austen Mad Lib.

So: please suggest words that fit the following categories, and then later today I'll post the finished version!

ABSTRACT IDEA:
ADVERB:
KIND OF PERSON:
POSSESSION:
MEMBER OF FAMILY OR HOUSEHOLD:
DEGREE/EXTENT:
PLURAL NOUN:
ANOTHER PLURAL NOUN:
PLACE:
GROUP OF HUMANS:
ANOTHER MEMBER OF FAMILY OR HOUSEHOLD:

So just suggest as many as you like, and I will take a random assortment of suggestions, and we'll see what we get!

And don't forget: next Tuesday, we'll be discussing the Leslie Howard version of THE SCARLET PIMPERNEL!


Cara
Cara King, who owns many plural nouns

And the Award Goes To...Who?

No, this isn't a post about the SAG Awards. I'll leave that to Amanda, our resident fashionista, but I will say that the dresses were much better than the Golden Globes, except for Meryl Streep, whose daughter looks just like her but was better dressed. Angelina Jolie managed to look frumpy.

What I'm really blogging about is judging contests. This is Romance's season of contests and lots of us will be judging contests, the RITAs (Romance Writers of America's awards for published books), the Golden Heart (RWA's unpublished manuscript contest), and RWA Chapter contests.

I'm judging the RITAs right now and just dipped into my first entry. I have seven books in a variety of categories, mostly Series romance, which I hardly ever read on my own. I decided to start with the ones I least wanted to read and, lo and behold, I really liked the first book I picked up.

Here are my personal criteria to judge The RITAs. This would work for the Golden Heart, too.

9 - I'd really like this enty to win
8 - I wouldn't mind this entry winning
7 - This is very good, but it shouldn't win
6 - This is above average
5 - This is competently written but it is just average
4 - This is below average; it has some problems
3 - This has even more problems
2 - This one is very flawed
1 - I can't imagine scoring a 1 - it would have to be incoherent.

I start out with the premise that I'm picking up a winner, then tick off "points" if I discover problems or if the story ultimately disappoints me.

I also thought a bit about what it is that makes me like a book:

1. It makes me care about the characters. In this book, I didn't like the hero much at first, but he did intrigue me and that was enough. He changed into a character I did like.

2. The characters feel like real people, not cliches. These characters were familiar "types" but the author succeeded in giving them a fresh look.

3. I want to keep reading. I didn't want to put this book down.

4. Everything makes sense. The characters' motivations, how they behave, what happens, all makes sense; nothing feels contrived. Nothing happens that makes me feel, "Naw. That ain't right."

5. The pacing seems right. Too often we speed up at the story's end and it can feel rushed. This one did pretty good. This book strayed a teensy bit from my ideal. Not much though.

6. Nothing stops me and makes me have to go back to figure it out. In this case, I had to go back for one detail, but that was all.

This book will get high marks from me and it encourages me to read the next one on my list.

How about you? What makes a book or a contest entry a winner to you? What are your criteria? Even if you are primarily a reader, you know what makes a good book.

Contests have been very kind to me. I sold my first book entirely because of the Golden Heart and I won Romance's highest award, the RITA the second time I entered for A Reputable Rake. (That's me with the Mills & Boon editors in Atlanta, 2007)

What contests are you entering?


There is still time to enter my contest. And come visit the Wet Noodle Posse for more tips on how to be good to yourself.

Regal Fashions


Last Tuesday, of course, was finally the inauguration of President Obama! I watched TV all day, and besides the speeches and music and oaths, I wanted to see who wore what. (Shallow of me, I know, but it seems I was not alone--when I googled "Michelle Obama inauguration clothes" I found millions of hits!). I thought she looked great, both in the Isabel Toledo lemony-yellow dress and coat and the floaty white goddess gown by young New York designer Jason Wu. Elegant and appropriate, without being stuffy or dowdy (though I did not care for those green shoes!). Malia and Sasha Obama were adorable--I must get an orange scarf to go with my pink coat, immediately.












I have to say, though, my favorite outfits of the day belonged to Jill Biden. The red coat and groovy boots, the red chiffon Reem Acra gown--gorgeous. I love the way these women are making it not only fine, but fashionable, to be both smart and serious and have fun with clothes!

It made me wonder--what did some of the great ladies of history wear for their coronations? What I found: lots of white satin, gold embroidery, purple velvet, and ermine! I saw none of that on Tuesday...





Elizabeth I (January 15, 1559)



Marie Antoinette (I could not actually find a portrait; it was described as white satin, embroidered with gold thread, pearls, and sapphires. The date was June 11, 1775)

Queen Charlotte (September 22, 1761--she had just been married on September 8)

Empress Josephine (December 2, 1804)

Queen Victoria (June 28, 1838)



Tsarina Alexandra (May 14, 1896)




Elizabeth II (June 2, 1953--gown by Norman Hartnell, who also did her wedding dress in 1947. The embroidery is emblems of the British Empire)


If you were going to a coronation or an inauguration, what would you wear???

A View To A Kill



Sometime they'll give a war and nobody will come.

Carl Sandburg (1878 - 1967), The People, Yes (1936)

Okay, so I've had this bee in my bonnet since finishing Bernard Cornwell's Rebel a few weeks ago:

What is it with people going out to watch battles being waged, as though it's a Cirque de Soleil performance or something?


In Rebel, a bunch of politicians from the North go to watch their Yankees beat the Rebels (yeah, it's a Civil War book) and bring their wives. The Southern ladies also set up a spot from which to watch the fighting.

And in some Regencies, and in Cornwell's Sharpe series, people go watch the battle. I just don't get it. Like, not get it so much that it's really bugging me.

Why would anyone want to go watch people die? Why treat it as an exhibition? What happens if your side loses and the victors decide they want some of your lovely fried chicken? Or if you distract someone fighting so they lose an eye or something worse?

I know it's a small thing, but I just cannot fathom how this even came to be. Not that there weren't observers at these types of battles; journalists often came to write up the proceedings for their papers. But dilettante viewers?!?

But because I am a writer, I wonder how the fact of observing battle could be turned into a fun or provocative book: What if a woman watched and learned how to fight? Then joined up herself, in drag? What if someone saw one soldier kill his commander in the heat of the battle--but no-one else saw? What if the observers saw a way, because of their position, for their side to win if they had some crucial information?

What would you never want to see in person? What have you always wanted to see for real? How could you imagine a Regency lady would react to seeing this carnage? What other scenarios for fiction could you imagine?

Thanks, and I am really glad to get this off my chest,

Megan

Byron, birthdays, and putting back the joy

Happy birthday, Byron, 221 years old today! I'm blogging about him on Delle Jacobs' In Search of Heroes blog today (or possibly later today, as Blogger has been a bad boy--doubtless in Byron's honor--and Delle and I are three hours apart), so come on over and visit.

It's also the birthday of my dad, the Old Man who is not a Tree, who is a mere 98 years old. He was born the year the Titanic sank. He remembers traveling alone on a train when he was very small, and being given chocolate by soldiers on their way to the front in World War One. I'm sorry I don't have a digital image of him.

A few weeks ago, at the beginning of the new year, we talked about various things we intended to do this year, and one of the big issues that a lot of us were interested in was how to put the joy back in writing. I suspect that this could cover several posts, but I'll get the ball rolling here. And not only writing--this could apply to any sort of creative endeavor, something to which you've made a commitment but which now seems stale.

Let me get personal on you here. When I first started writing, it was an amazing experience. I'd come home from work and produce a few thousand words every evening, more on the weekends--I wrote 14k words one weekend. I'm not saying they were good words, but they were prolific and they were there, and that's half the battle. I dreamed and daydreamed about my characters. I wrote whole scenes in my head and typed them up, word for word. My subconscious kicked in at the drop of a hat. I developed a sort of ritual of placing my fingertips on the keyboard and breathing. Then I wrote and wrote. My mantra at the time was just do it (not very original, but it worked).

Smugly, I acknowledged that I wasn't one of those writers--the ones who were always complaining about having to write and doing anything--housework, even--to avoid writing.

And then I became one of those writers. What happened?

Part of the problem (don't kill me, please) was getting published. For one thing, it's really easy to get all tied up in the niceties of marketing and promotion. If you want to get some perspective on this, read this article by Julie Ann Long on the Tao of Publishing, based on the presentation she and her agent made at nationals in San Francisco last year. I realized fairly recently (duh) that the success of your book (in print publishing, at least) is determined by your print run, a number chosen by your publisher and completely outside your control. Unless you're one of the rare exceptions and your book takes off, with or without your efforts, leading to multiple print runs, you won't make the bestseller lists.

Also, once you're published, you find yourself up against all sorts of expectations, or perceived expectations--those of your readers, your agent, your editor. You must keep writing about the Regency, you must write the same sort of books; yes, you may long to write about reindeer breeders in fifth century Lapland, but at the moment it's just Not Hot, so write it in your spare time. (What spare time?! I'm too busy blogging, pricing promotional items online, googling myself, and handing out bookmarks to strangers!)

Also something from the past may come to bite you on the ass as we say in the Regency. In my case, it was something I heard all the time during my formative years: that if you enjoy doing something, you won't like it if you do it as a job. This is in direct contrast to the mantra of the 1980s (and beyond?) that you should do something you love and the money will come.

I did my best to disprove the family theory by doing jobs that I did indeed love, but writing was a different matter, and I had to really struggle with this. One thing that helped was looking at the theory in perspective; this was the theory of my parents and their generation. At least three of them wanted to be professional musicians but found that circumstances--being the only one in the family with a job during the Great Depression, World War II--made it impossible for them to fulfil their dream. One of them was talked out of it by her jealous sister. And musicians generally have to grab the opportunity at a time when they're at the peak of their physical dexterity and mental alertness; a year or two can make all the difference.

Whereas writers... well, I was a late bloomer. I'm not someone who wanted to be a writer all their life. I'm not making any great claims to mental alertness either, but it's a different process.

And the bottom line--I refuse to accept this theory that was drummed into me along with other dubious advice from my family. I will trust my instincts (a good rule for writing too).

That helped, and strangely enough, just writing--just doing it--helps. I finished my revisions for A Most Lamentable Comedy (August, 2009), and that helped me get back into the swing. I'm started a new partial, and that's always fun, by participating in a BIAW (book in a week) with my local chapter. My agent told me she liked my idea for my next Little Black Dress book (I posted a short excerpt last week). Oh, and I got an advance check, and that always cheers me up, even if I've spent it several times already. I've decided early what I'm going to do for promotion in August so I can concentrate on writing now.

So yes, you can put the joy back in. I feel it's presumptious to give advice to people without contracts, but I will say that now is when you can get really good at writing; hone your voice; play around with different conventions and historical periods. Have fun. Build inventory, because you may be the one who introduces romance's next trend, hot love among the reindeer herds in fifth century Lapland. Determine to have fun throughout the process. Rejections--and I get a lot, honestly, still--are an evolutionary process to find the house and agent who are right for you and your style.

So what do you think?

J.A. Evening Winners!


The winners of the prizes that accompanied Tuesday's Jane Austen Evening post are:

Maddie

and

Santa!

Maddie & Santa, please send your info to me at riskies@yahoo.com, and I'll email you your prize choices... :-)


Cara & the Riskies

Some Sad News


Elena will be away from the blog for a while. Her husband is ill and facing a long recovery. Elena's time needs to be spent tending to him and to her children. While she is away we'll be tapping guest bloggers to fill in for her on Wednesdays.

Please share your support for Elena here. We're not asking her to respond, but we know that your good wishes and prayers will lift her spirits.

Thanks so much from the Riskies

Emily Bryan Winner!

The winner of Vexing the Viscount is...Eva S! Congratulations! Please send your info to us at riskies@yahoo.com

Jane Austen Evening 2009, and Prizes!



First off, I would like to welcome any newcomers or visitors to the blog! Risky Regencies is a light-hearted community of Regency writers and Regency fans, and we provide great discussions on everything from the merits of the 1995 miniseries of Pride and Prejudice to rereading Georgette Heyer.

Now, to today's subject: the 2009 Jane Austen Evening, which I attended this past Saturday!

(In fact, I enjoyed it so very much, that I shall be giving away two Regency-themed prizes to lucky commenters today! Just comment on this post by Wednesday night, and you'll be entered to win a DVD of the Rintoul/Garvie version of Pride and Prejudice, or the guidebook to the Bath Museum of Costume, or a book on Sarah Siddons, or another prize of your choice!)

I have now attended something like six Jane Austen Evenings, and it seems to me they get better every year.

As always, it was held in a gorgeous location (as these photos attest!)

First, we had a Regency tea, with as much scrumptious period food as one could eat, plus a variety of teas.

My favorite food this year was the sweet rosemary shortbread -- I went back for more.

And more...

And more... (Oh, it was heavenly!)

I think every year, the costumes are better, and the dancers more experienced.

And this year, it seemed to me that the costumes weren't only fabulous, but that nearly everyone was in some sort of costume.

There were moments when one could truly picture oneself back in Jane Austen's time!

(Though the cameras, I suppose, were a tiny bit anachronistic.) ;-)

Then again, with so many amazing costumes, who could blame those of us who took photos?

(And more photos!)

(And still more!)

(In fact, I took so many, that I had to do two blog posts today to hold them all...)

I even brought a camcorder this time -- though I've yet to see how my taping turned out!

(If it turned out well, then I'm going to upload some of it to youtube, just as Jane Austen would have done herself.)

Then, after all the splendid tea, we danced all night.

(My feet were killing me by the end!)

So: if you want to comment on this post, feel free to answer any or all of the following questions:

Did you attend the Jane Austen Evening? What did you think? Which was your favorite part? (Your favorite food, or dance, or costume?)

If you didn't attend it, which part sounds the most alluring?

Which is your favorite photo?

Have you ever attended a similar event?

All comments welcome!

(And if you want to see my posts on previous Jane Austen Evenings and Playford Balls, just click the link below that says "Jane Austen Evening.")


Cara
Cara King, author of MY LADY GAMESTER and dancer of Maggots




More Jane Austen Evening Pictures













Historic Celebrations

Our own historic events this week seem too important to ignore, especially if you live where I do, in the suburbs of Washington, DC. No matter what your political views, you cannot escape the excitement generated by this inauguration. Like many residents of the area, we'll be staying home for the event itself, but Saturday my husband and I went downtown to look at the preparations for the Inauguration. Thought I'd share.

Here I am in the front of the Capitol. This is where the Oath of Office used to be taken, until Reagan was inaugurated. It is the West view of the Capitol that faces the Mall where the Oath is taken now.









The front of the Capitol faces the Library of Congress, one of the most beautiful buildings in DC.











Here I am in front of the West view. This is as close as we could get. Notice all the chairs and the bleachers.











Here's a close up view of the podium (the semi-circular place)where Obama will take the oath of office.










This is the view Obama will see.












Most spectators will be watching on screens like this. This screen was on and showing bison or something running from a fire.











The Press were already setting up. See MSNBC and the Smithsonian Castle in the background.











But here were the real preparations. Porta-potties everywhere.




Which makes you wonder what people did in the Regency when they gathered for parades and festivities. I shudder to think.



The best part, though, was seeing everyone downtown smiling. That never happens in DC.

So do you wish you could be in Washington DC to attend? We're expecting 2 million people.
What do you think it would have been like in London for the Waterloo or Trafalgar celebrations?

To read my blog about Happiness, visit The Wet Noodle Posse.
To enter my contest to win one of my books visit my website.

The Riskies Welcome Emily Bryan!


Here at Risky Regencies we're thrilled to "meet" for the first time Dorchester author Emily Bryan, who is making a stop here on her blog tour! For more information on her books, be sure and visit her website--and comment here for a chance to win a signed copy of Vexing the Viscount...

Riskies:
Welcome, Emily! We're so excited to see you here. Tell us about Vexing the Viscount (great title, BTW)! Where did you get the idea for this book, and how does it fit into your series (along with Pleasuring the Pirate and Distracting the Duchess)?

Emily: Honestly, the title came first! As you can see, I had a little pattern going with my XXXing the XX style titles, and my editor liked the alliteration. It was a little like solving a puzzle, trying to think of something that fit the criteria without being ridiculous. Diddling the Duke was too silly! Murdering the Marquess too grim. The idea of someone "vexing" someone else appealed to me because I believe part of the charm of romance is the concept of "gentle torture." My heroine Daisy is bound and determined to have Lucian, Viscount Rutland, and if she has to vex the living daylights out of him to accomplish her goal, so be it!

My books aren't really a series, though. Distracting the Duchess stands alone. It's set in 1851, more than 100 years after the events in Pleasuring the Pirate (1720) or (1731). However, I would say my Pirate and my Viscount are related titles. Daisy Drake is the niece of Gabriel Drake (the pirate) and we first meet her in Pleasuring the Pirate as a precocious 10-year-old. Knowing her as a child made her much easier to write as an adult. And a few other characters from Pleasuring the Pirate besides Daisy return in Vexing the Viscount, most notably Isabella Wren, a former courtesan who is also Daisy's great-aunt. It's not necessary to read Pirate to enjoy Viscount--I think the stories stand on their own, but of course I hope readers want to dive into both!

Riskies: What are some interesting research tidbits you found for these books? (I'm especially intrigued by the mention of Roman treasure!

Emily: The Romans were everywhere in the ancient world! I've been blessed to travel through the UK and Europe and have visited a number of ruins of their distant outposts (haven't made it to Rome itself yet, but I'm working on it!). It amazed me that these ancients recreated their culture wherever they went, building amphitheaters, bath houses, and elegant villas with indoor plumbing and heated floors. And they also brought along their unique taste in household ornamentation. In the opening of Vexing the Viscount, Daisy is inspecting an ancient clay lamp shaped like an erect phallus. Romans believed representations of male genitalia brought good luck. (Hmmm--I wonder if that is where the phrase "getting lucky" comes from?). The Romans used little decorative phalli as Victorians might use tassels.

I probably wouldn't have believed this if I hadn't seen it with my own eyes. When I was visiting the Romisch-Germanisches Museum in Koln, Germany, there was an entire room filled with phallus-shaped lamps and windchimes, some with wings (I kid you not!) or little legs affixed to the side like a developing tadpole. (A "kissing a lot of frogs" joke springs to mind, but...no! We will not got there). It was so surreal. I had to file it away as something to use in a book someday. It made sense for Daisy to be as fascinated as I was by that naughty Roman art, and why not let my hero be hot on the trail of a lost Roman treasure? If you're interested in learning more about the Romans who founded Londinium. please visit my Roman forum. There's also an excerpt from the Roman part of Vexing the Viscount!

Riskies: You also write as Diana Groe. Tell us a bit about those books!

Emily: Maidensong, my debut title, is a Viking romance set in 9th cebtury Scandinavia. Erinsong is my Irish love story, also 9th century. And Silk Dreams is a harem tale set in 11th century Byzantium. Obscure enough for you?? They didn't take off as well as I hoped in the US market, but they've been translated into German, Dutch, Italian, and Russian. Diana Groe has received fan mail from all over the world! All 3 books are still in print and available at Amazon and BarnesAndNoble.com. I maintain a separate website for these tales here.

Riskies: And how do they differ from the Emily Bryan books (aside from setting!)?

Emily: My Emily Bryan books are fun, sexy romps. My Missouri writers group labels my Emily Bryan stories "ribald yet classy"--which I always thought was a pretty fine line to walk!

The Diana Groe titles are darker, grittier, as true to the times as I could make them and still be palatable to a modern audience. I've killed off characters I cared about. These stories are not quite "safe," if you know what I mean.

Riskies: Your website features some great writing tips!

Emily: Yes, I have several pages dedicated to aspiring writers under Write Stuff. When I started writing, I received so much help from other writers. Now that I've been published multiple times, I want to give back!

Riskies: What are some of your favorite tips?

Emily: The page on Self-Editing. I need to remind myself to be ruthless with my work. I can't afford to fall in love with my own words so much that I won't cut in order to serve the story. Someone is going to slash my baby up--that someone should be me.

Riskies: What's next for you?

Emily: After Vexing the Viscount hits the bookstores on February 24, I have a number of speaking engagements all across the country in 2009. Check my Events page here--I may be coming to a town near you! And my next release is a holiday novella due out at the end of October. It's part of an anthology with USA Today best-seller Jennifer Ashley and Alissa Johnson. All our characters will be attending the same Christmas ball, and you're invited, too! If you'd like to notified as to new releases, you can sign up at my website for the newsletter.

Thanks for letting me visit with your readers, Riskies! I'm delighted to give away a copy of Vexing the Viscount...


Fashion, Then and Now


Okay, I know it's been a week since the Golden Globes, but you knew I would just have to talk about it, right? With no Tilda Swinton this year, I was hoping someone would bring the wackiness and save us from an endless sea of styled-up good taste. And luckily there were plenty of questionable choices, with Renee Zellweger nobly leading the pack in a dress that never should have seen the light of day. With the addition of the crazy hair, she could be heading to an audition to play Bertha Rochester in the attic.





Other than that, there were a few, more minor missteps (IMO, anyway!). Maggie Gylenhaal is too young to look she's shopping at a boutique for Florida retirees; Drew Barrymore, great dress--bad hair; and Eva Mendes and Blake Lively looked like they had no time to have their gowns properly fitted before running out the door (ditto for Cameron Diaz, but somehow she always manages to look like she mistakenly put her couture gowns in the clothes dryer!)

But it was mostly good! Black, cream, and metallics were big, as was strapless (which I keep hoping is a trend that will fade away, but it never does!). Still, of my top 4 favorites, 3 were strapless, so go figure. Those favorites:


Kate Winslet (always so elegant)

Anne Hathaway (I love the midnight-blue color! But she is getting a bit scary-skinny...)

January Jones (another color I love!)

And Freida Pinto from Slumdog Millionaire (my favorite of the night!)
The next big fashion event will be the Inauguration on Tuesday! I can't wait to see what Michelle Obama wears, and wish so much I could be there in person (though I will be glued to my TV!)


And just to keep this blog somewhat on-topic--on this date in 1775, Richard Brinsley Sheridan's play The Rivals had its premier! Though it's possibly his most-performed play these days, it had a somewhat rocky beginning.

The Rivals was Sheridan's second commercially produced play, written while he was a cash-strapped, 23-year-old newlywed living in Bath with his new wife, the famous singer Elizabeth Linley. It was first performed at Covent Garden, and was roundly booed by the public and the critics for its overly-long length, its bawdiness, and the character of the Irishman Sir Lucius O'Trigger ("a meanly written role played very badly" by the actor Mr. Lee, who was hit in the head by an apple during the performance and stopped to berate the audience. BTW, if it was too long and too bawdy in 1775, it must have been very long and very bawdy indeed!)

Sheridan apologized for any impression that O'Trigger was meant as an insult to Ireland, and set about doing extensive revisions in 11 days. On January 28, it re-opened with a new actor and a shorter length, and went on to great popularity. It became a favorite of the royal family, with 5 command performances in 10 years, and was also ironically a favorite of George Washington.

The story is set in Bath, and centers around the young lovers Lydia Languish and Captain Jack Absolute. Lydia, a very Catherine Morland sort of girl who reads lots of novels, wants a Romantic Affair. So, Jack pretends to be a poor ensign, not a wealthy officer from a good family (who, ironically, has been betrothed to Lydia by his father, all unknowing!). Lydia loves the idea of eloping with a poor soldier behind the back of her guardian, the famous Mrs. Malaprop ("He was the very pineapple of fashion!")

Lydia also has 2 other suitors, Bob Acres (a buffoonish country squire) and the argumentative Irishman O'Trigger. The plot is full of misunderstandings, duels, acceptances, quarrels, etc, until all ends well.

I recently read a very interesting novel called Jack Absolute by C.C. Humphrys, which re-tells the story in a much more dramatic fashion. A good source for this post was Linda Kelly's Richard Brinsley Sheridan, A Life (1997). And a good source for Golden Globes pics is the Entertainment Weekly website!

Who were your favorites at the Golden Globes? Seen any good productions of The Rivals?

And you can see an excerpt of High Seas Stowaway this week at Unusual Historicals...

Fewer Bonnets, More Grit?


Some intriguing, perhaps disheartening, news from across the water:

This week, the BBC announced it planned to move away from traditional 19th century costume dramas in favor of a grittier look at the period and a new focus on other historical eras.

A senior BBC drama insider said, "There is to be an evolution in the presentation of period dramas, moving away from classic 19th century so-called 'bonnet' dramas to looking at other periods of history. This will allow us to look at other times and places in British and world history. The aim is to give drama audiences something new and different to enjoy."

Traditional costume dramas would not be abandoned altogether, but the BBC will focus on the new type of period drama--an adaptation of the award-winning novel Small Island, about Jamaican immigrants moving to Britain in the 1940s, and Desperate Romantics, about a group of "vagabond painters and poets" set among the "alleys, galleries and flesh houses of 19th century industrial London", among the first to be broadcast later this year.

While at first blush this might seem like bad news for fans of the costume dramas--and that still might be true--it might be beneficial in the long run to revitalizing the BBC drama and placing "costume dramas" within a wider drama context, thus making the "costume drama" not just a precious oddity, but another subset under the Drama banner.

I do worry sometimes that our (meaning historical fans) tendency to fetishize our history means it doesn't translate to a broader audience. I like the idea that the BBC is branching out, as we encourage our readers and authors to branch out in era, location and characters.

What do you think?

Megan

The Meet Cute

Elena blogged yesterday about the first time and I'm blogging today about the Meet Cute (with or without a hyphen), the very first meeting of hero/heroine.

Although Wikipedia defines it as an element of screwball comedy or romantic comedy, I think it's a staple of romantic fiction, because it determines the elements of hero/heroine interaction. Rarely do a hero/heroine meet and find that everything is compatible between them straight away. Austen gives us a prime example of the Meet Cute when Darcy first encounters Elizabeth: She is not handsome enough to tempt me.

So we get Elizabeth's and Darcy's reaction to each other, their misconceptions about each other, and, miraculously (if we knew how Austen did this academia would grind to a halt, the mystery solved) their attraction to each other despite themselves.

Since I have a sinus infection that is making my nose look like a banana (misshapen, not yellow) I'm going to invite you to share your favorite Meet Cutes of all time in romance, and share with you the Meet Cute from my WIP. I think this scene will stay, although I've just figured out the plot and a lot of stuff has to be rewritten:

.
.. there is someone sprawled on a chair. He wears plain black—very fashionable for a gentleman, of course—but on this man it looks as though he intends to fight a duel and possibly conduct the funeral service over his unlucky opponent all in the same day. His dark hair is unruly, also eminently fashionable but in a way that, along with his unshaven chin, suggests he has but recently risen from his bed.

Goodness.

He is lean, dramatic, handsome as the devil, and I suspect the bed was not his.

A rake!

Will my reputation fall around me in tatters if I approach him?

I regard the soggy handkerchief in my hand and regret that the bosom of my gown, fashionably brief, does not allow for extra cargo.

While I have been staring at him I have in fact been moving toward him, like a mouse fascinated by a snake, so I arrive in front of him as he looks up—his eyes are shadowed, naturally, his eyelashes dark and lush, his face lean and bony—and gazes straight at my bosom.

He yawns.

And hop over to History Hoydens today where our very own Amanda McCabe is talking about sixteenth century navigation!

The First Time

The next chapter in my mess-in-progress is a deflowering scene. Yes, my heroine is a virgin and I feel a bit out-of-date, given the popularity of courtesan and widowed heroines. I enjoy those stories, but I can’t help it. The heroine of this story just is a virgin, though not for long. :)

I’ve been thinking about other “first time” scenes I’ve read in historical romances and also the comments I’ve read on review sites and reader discussion boards. They are all over the place! Some readers can’t believe scenes in which the heroine is nervous and traumatized and the hero apologetic. At the opposite end, some readers say it’s not believable for a heroine in a historical romance (or sometimes even any woman) to really enjoy her first time.

I’m guessing some of these attitudes trace back to those readers’ personal experience. Me, I have my usual response to any credibility issue: It depends.

The physical experience must have varied then as it does now.
As for the heroine’s emotions, that could depend on how much she knows. A while back we discussed the question of What did they know? and concluded there were some ways young women could learn about sex, though some likely came to the marriage bed ignorant. How the heroine would feel would also depend on how well she knows and trusts the hero, and how far they’ve gone already. Also on the spontaneity of the scene; in heat-of-the-moment sex, she wouldn’t have time to get nervous the way she might on a wedding night.

I find a little anxiety very natural. Even if the heroine hasn’t been warned it would hurt and advised to “think of England”, even if she trusts the hero and is hot for him, she might still have the normal fears anyone could have when doing something for the first time. Will it be fun? Will I be good at it?

I think a bit of nervous anticipation can make the sex more exciting. I can believe that a heroine is eager, but I find it harder to believe if she is bold and skillful, without some interesting explanation of how she got that way. A little vulnerability makes things more real and therefore hotter. And as for virginal heroes, they can be a blast. So horny and so very anxious to please… :)

I think some of this still applies to couples in which neither is a virgin. If it’s their first time, or even their first time after a long separation in a “second chance at love” type of story, there’s still that tension of how it will go and where it will lead. And there's another kind of heat when people are good at it, and know it.

So what do you think? What sorts of first time sex scenarios do you find believable? Most hot? Or not?

Elena
www.elenagreene.com

Anna Campbell Winners

Virginia and JC, you have won signed copies of Tempt the Devil! Contact Anna at anna@annacampbell.info

Hardbacks, Paperbacks, Anybacks?


It seems to me that most dedicated readers are passionate not only about books, but about books -- so let's talk books!!!

So...how do you prefer yours?

Do you prefer the way hardcovers stay open in your lap?

Do you like the lightweight portability of mass-market paperbacks?

Do trade paperbacks (that is, the larger paperbacks) seem to you the perfect compromise?

Do you ever smell the paper of your books?

Pet the covers?

Line up all the books on your shelf perfectly evenly?

And while we're on the subject, how do you read?

Do you break the spine of your paperbacks, to make them stay open? Or do you prefer a near-pristine book?

If you're in the pristine book category, have you ever read a library copy of a book you already own, so you could keep your own copy undamaged? ;-) (I confess that I have!)

And do you like to eat while you read?

Drink tea? Coffee? Hot chocolate?

Lie in a hammock? Relax by the fire? Sit on a sunny park bench?

All answers welcome!

Cara
Cara, who has smelled many a book in her time...

More About Movies

Funny that we should have been discussing so many movies watched over the holidays and over the past year. This past week I made use of the "On Demand" function of my cable service and watched movies instead of reruns of Clean House (my favorite show).

These were all historical movies, two I'd never seen before.

1. Emma, the Gwynth Paltrow one, not my favorite, but it was the only Regency movie I could discover and I like to see the settings and costumes, if not Paltrow's performance.










2. Amazing Grace. Can you believe I never saw this movie before? I did like it very much. Such a wonderful message. Ioan Gruffudd, older than his Hornblower days, is quite an appealing man. And his singing voice! Sigh. The hymn Amazing Grace is special to me; it was a comfort in the days my mother was ill (almost twenty years ago). I still cry when I hear it.







3. Miss Potter. What a charming film. I did not mind American Renee Zelwegger playing the English part nearly as much as I minded Gwynth Paltrow, although I did wish she had not scrunched her mouth up quite as much. The scenery was beautiful, as was the story and I loved the use of animation. What one of us does not believe our characters aren't really real?

I'm turning in the revisions of my Undone story, the one you helped me with. You forgot to tell me to make it sexier....What a hard job this is!


Next I turn to my book revisions.....status check: Where are you in your writing or reading or simply living now that we are in the new year?

Did I tell you my The Mysterious Miss M is included in Romantic Times Readers Forum list of 1001 Books We Must Read Before We Die? See this and more on my website. Enter my contest for a chance to win a copy of my backlist.

Anna Campbell At Risky Regencies!

We're happy to welcome back today Anna Campbell! Comment for a chance to win a copy of Tempt the Devil...

Risky Regencies: It's been a while since we've "seen" you here at RR, Anna! What have you been up to?

Anna Campbell: Hiya, Riskies! Thank you so much for having me back to visit. I love it over here, as you know! But where is Bertie? You know I hang around here mainly to flirt with that a la mode paragon. Don't tell me he has found another ballroom to grace! I shall weep into my Mechelin lace handkerchief! Although I won't blow my nose in it. Euch!

2008 did not feature a new Anna Campbell book on the shelves in America, but I've definitely been busy in the interim. I wrote my next book, which as yet is without an official title. I'm currently calling it the "Manderley book" because the hero has a lovely old house on the Cornish cliffs. It's out in November, and features a runaway heiress and a PTSD knight in shining armor here. Standard angst-ridden Anna Campbell fare!

I had my first 2 short stories publisjed in a really big magazine here in Australia. That felt like a huge achievement for someone who didn't think she could EVER write a short story. You can find them both here--just go to the bottom of the page and click on either title.

I shall control my blushes and say my biggest moment for 2008 was the double-RITA final. That was one of my writing dreams that came true! It was such fun visiting San Francisco and wearing those green ribbons at conference. Actually, it was just fun to visit San Francisco. What a great city! Another special moment was when Claiming the Courtesan was nominated for Romantic Book of the Year here in Australia.

RR: You call Tempt the Devil a "Regency noir Affair to Remember." Sounds intriguing! Tell us more about that. How did you come up with this idea?

AC: I suspect I'm the only person who will see the connection! An Affair to Remember was my late mother's favorite film so I watched it a lot! One day I was thinking about those characters in a Regency setting and realized that Terry is a kept woman, i.e. courtesan, and Nicky is a rake, if not a gigolo! For these sophisticated, jaded characters, falling in love is a disaster. They've got life pretty well sorted out. Then wham! Love takes them over and they're stuck doing all sorts of things they wouldn't have dreamed of doing. I also loved the way both Nicky and Terry used wit as a defense against the world. That part of An Affair to Remember definitely translated to Tempt the Devil.

RR: What are the famous historical women you used as inspiration for Olivia?

AC: Olivia was very much her own person, but I did steal a few details form actual women to round out her character. Some of the research I did for TTD was just too good to be ignored!

In appearance, she looks very much like a young Lauren Bacall. I wanted someone who wasn't a conventional beauty but could still stop traffic. Some of her behavior is borrowed from George Sand, the French novelist, who was such a scandalous and charismatic character in 1830s Paris. My book is set in 1826 so it didn't seem too much of a leap. Sand was an amazing character--althought I'm not sure I would have liked her very much. These days she's mainly famous as Chopin's lover, but she was a strong, dynamic, self-willed woman of genius who supported herself with her pen when that was almost unheard of. She regularly wore men's clothing and smoked in public, and led an extremely torrid love life!

I borrowed a few minor details from a famous courtesan in the Victorian era called Skittles (apparently because as a child prostitute she plied her trade outside a skittles alley). Her real name was Catherine Walters and she became the mistress of Edward VII as well as a number of the best and brightest of the time. She never kissed and told, and all reports indicated she was a sparkling, joyful, compassionate companion. I think I would have liked her! She was also a famous horsewoman and used to have herself sewn into her riding habit for rides in Hyde Park so her superb figure was shown to best advantage.

RR: And what's next for you?

AC: I just started my 5th book for Avon. I always like the early stages of a book--anything seems possible! It's set in London and will have a similar atmosphere to Tempt the Devil. Or at least that's the idea so far. I find out the stories change drastically from conception to actual writing!

RR: This week we've been talking about some of our favorite reads for 2008. What are some of yours?

AC: I actually had a great reading year! Some new authors I discovered are C.S. Harris who writes Regency romantic mysteries featuring a charismatic hero, Viscount St. Cyr. On the complete opposite of the spectrum I discovered a wonderful Harlequin author called Kathleen O'Reilly who writes amazingly textured books full of emotion and sensuality. I'd recommend her stuff to anyone. I discovered the Inspector Lynley mysteries by Elizabeth George late in the year and have since read 7! I read my first J.D. Robb and disovered what all the fuss is about. One of my Bandita friends, Jeanne Adams, wrote a great romantic suspense as her debut book, Dark and Dangerous. I really enjoyed Deanna Rayburn's Silent in the Grave and Silent in the Sanctuary. As far as old favorites go, I really enjoyed books by Christine Wells, Susan Elizabeth Phillips, Madeline Hunter, Annie West, Tawny Weber--too many to mention, really!

You can read more about Anna Campbell and her books at her website!

Reads and Things 2008

Over the holiday (no day job for two weeks!) I spent a lot of time watching DVDs (not just Mamma Mia, I swear!). As you may have noticed, I really love movies, and I'm often very inspired by them to find stories of my own. I watched some that were new-to-me and re-watched some favorites. Among the re-watches--Cranford (I would love to do a sort of village-panorama story, if there was a market for such things), Our Mutual Friend, Anna Karenina (with Helen McCrory), and Topsy Turvy (one of my very favorite movies, though this one was an archaic VHS because for some unfathomable reason it is not on DVD). One of the new-to-me DVDs was The Way We Live Now, from the Trollope novel. Matthew McFadyen as a dim-witted cad, pursued by a wild Shirley Henderson! Miranda Otto pretending to be Scarlett O'Hara, threatening to get out her pistols and whips if a jilting Cillian Murphy doesn't marry her! David Suchet as the ultimate vulgar arriviste! I really liked it, and am not sure how I missed it this long.

I also watched a couple more of those Shakespeare Re-told movies (a few months ago, I saw their genius version of Taming of the Shrew, also with Shirley Henderson and a cross-dressing Rufus Sewall). This time I watched James McAvoy and Keeley Hawes as a celebrity chef and pushy wife version of Macbeth.

Oh, and I also watched Part One of that new version of Tess of the D'urbervilles on PBS. I have never much liked Tess (maybe Hardy is just too fateful and painful for me?), so I'm not much of a judge of how good an adaptation this might be. It sure looks pretty, with all those green rolling hills and picturesque cows, with Gemma Arterton's pretty hair and Eddie Redmayne's pretty lips. I do wonder why Hans Matheson seems to think he is playing Chuck Bass, just as he did as a (very whiny and in need of a bath) Essex in that Elizabeth I series with Anne Marie Duff. He was okay in that new Doctor Zhivago, though.

And speaking of Chuck Bass, I've also been watching a few season 1 episodes of Gossip Girl and have to say--season 2 has been much stronger. Now if they would just forget the totally wishy-washy Serena and Dan and make it "The All Chuck and Blair All The Time" show, I will be entirely happy.

Oh, but this is a book blog, yes? Okay, here is what my 2008 reading life looked like (from what I can remember):

I am far behind on romance reading. For one thing, much like Elena I can only hold one couple in my mind at the same time, and I have been on a constant deadline this year. I also don't like to feel inadequate when trying to finish writing a book, which a really, really good read can easily do. So I buy them and save them as vacation and "finish the book" treats! I think I read 4, and one was Diane's Scandalizing the Ton. I also totally recommend Nicola Cornick's Unmasked (dark and dramatic, with complex characters and great writing).





In fiction, I really enjoyed With Violets by Elizabeth Robards, a story of the Impressionist artist Bertha Morisot (this was especially good after my France trip and a visit to the Musee d'Orsay). And What Happened to Anna K by Irina Reyn, a re-telling of Anna Karenina in modern-day New York.













I read a lot more non-fiction. One I loved was Read My Heart: A Love Story in England's Age of Revolution by Jane Dunn, the tale of Sir William Temple and Dorothy Osborne. The couple fell deeply in love on first meeting, but faced strenuous family objections (the Osbornes were committed Royalists and the Temples sorta Parliamentarians, but the main objection was that neither had money). They wrote passionate letters for 7 years before marrying, and then had a long and loving marriage, despite money challenges, a complex Court career, and the loss of their children. A terrific and inspiring story. (Dunn also wrote some other good non-fiction in years past, like Elizabeth and Mary: Cousins, Rivals, Queens and Moon in Eclipse: A Life of Mary Shelley)

There was Champlain's Dream by David Hackett Fisher, about the French explorer, soldier, spy, mariner, etc. I actually did not know much about him except his name when I picked up this book, but as I wrote about last week I'm fascinated by 16th century exploration. Champlain fought for King Henri IV, and over 30 years traveled over 6 Canadian provinces and 5 states, founding and administering French settlements in North America. He also faced intrigue and warfare among native tribes and (worse!) court intrigue in Paris.

I received several books about France for Christmas, like the beautiful Marie Antoinette and the Last Garden at Versailles and A Revolution in Taste: The Rise of French Cuisine. I loved Tony Spawforth's Versailles: The Biography of a Palace, though it was not long enough! I wanted to know more, he had such a great style and way of making life at Versailles (the good, the bad, the ugly) come vividly to life.



So, happy 2009! May it bring us many good reads...

Megan's 2008 Media

Last year, I foisted my opinions of not just books, but music and film.

This year, I see no reason not to be as rude as before. Apparently, I love foisting.

So this year--

I continued reading a lot of series. I kept up with my J.R. Ward Crack Vampire fetish, reading Lover Enshrined. Still love her, the voice and story is worth any repetition, and I cannot WAIT for Rehvenge's story.



I also still love Meljean Brook, whose Demon Night I devoured (I got Demon Bound, too, but haven't read it yet. My bad.) Brook is one of the few authors who is both a guilty pleasure and a learning experience; she writes with such depth and knowledge that you have to think as you read, but her stories are fast-paced, dangerous and compelling.



Also on the paranormal tip is Carolyn Jewel's My Wicked Enemy, which I had the privilege of reading before it got to print, and then I reread it after it was published. I am happy to say Carolyn fixed all the parts I mentioned in my critique (insert smiley face here). Her demons are intense, dramatic and dark; her heroines are equally intense.

I read the last of Lilith Saintcrow's Dante Valentine series--really, if you like dark noir-ish paranormal, check this series out. Danny both kicks ass and takes names, and her mate Japhrimel is totally hawt. I began Saintcrow's next series, featuring Hunter Jill Kismet, and love it, too, although there is no hero yet to equal Japhrimel (sob).

On the historical side, I read Elizabeth Hoyt's To Taste Temptation and To Seduce A Sinner, both of which I liked, although nothing's reached the mastery (for me, at least) of The Raven Prince. I guess nothing ever compares with your first.



I know I read more historical than that, but for the life of me, I can't remember anything. Oy. The brain addling, apparently it starts happening after forty.

In another series continuation/ender, I finished Barbara Hambly's Dead Water, featuring Benjamin January. Again, an author who is deep and educational while still writing a crazy creative and intricate story. She has the biggest vocabulary of any author I've read besides A.S. Byatt.


This year in music, I discovered two Forever-My-Favorite-My-God-These-Are-Amazing-Records: Adele and Duffy. Both young British singers, both soulful in their way, both incredibly intimate and earwormingly catchy. I also loved (Beyonce sister) Solange's single "Sandcastle Disco" and Estelle's debut, especially "American Boy" featuring Kanye.





In movies--we saw the Dark Knight, but I wasn't blown away. Sue me. I thought Heath Ledger's performance was eerily awesome, and Christian Bale makes Anne Stuart's heroes look cheerful, but the whole didn't equal the parts, for me, at least. I received a Netflix subscription for my birthday, so I spent a lot of time watching historical dramas: The Forsyte Saga, with Damian Lewis, The Tenant of Wildfell Hall, Northanger Abbey, Jane Eyre, etc. I also saw Bent, starring Clive Owen, which was fantastic, and not just because Clive is in it. The Chancer series, for example, stunk, although a young (and gawky!) Clive was in it.



This year, I am looking forward to more Ward, Brook, Saintcrow, Jewel and Hoyt; Carla Kelly and Loretta Chase both have new books out, too. I will continue to delve through the TBR pile, and will try not to fret that I've been reading a book for two weeks, which is an eternity in Frampton Reading Land.

Thanks for indulging me! What series are you hooked on? What are you looking forward to in 2009?

Big Reads of 2008

I'm blessed with ample reading opportunities on my commute and in the bathtub, and like Diane I also like to read before I go to sleep. So it's quite common for me to have a book on the metro and a book (or two) at home. You'd think I would have a lot more books to talk about than I actually do. I had to go and look at my account on Goodreads to see what I've read this year as well as the ones knocking around in my head.

I don't read a lot of romance for various reasons, but I have to mention a couple: Pam Rosenthal's wonderful, inventive, subtle, sexy The Edge of Impropriety, a book for and about grown-ups, and not just because of the sex. Honest. Also Julie Ann Long's terrific The Perils of Pleasure, with its elegant prose and complex characters, though to be honest I'm not sure what it was about, but heck, I had a good time with it.

I also have been re-reading Heyer after an absence of, uh, several decades. I talked about Regency Buck a couple of weeks ago. I also read Cousin Kate--meh, zzzz, Gothically silly; Frederica--this must be the book which began the tradition in romance of adorable children and rumbunctious cute dogs, or the other way round if you prefer; The Nonesuch--sorry, all I could think of was Where's Waldo, but it had a terrific spoiled bimbo anti-heroine; Devil's Cub--loved it up to where Mary shot him and then was appalled that she turned into his mom (but obviously, with a cross-dressing loony as his real mother, what else would we expect?); A Woman of Quality--interesting because it was one of her later books with a heroine who was bored and grumpy, but no discernible plot; and Bath Tangle, which I gave up on after finding the hundreds of characters Heyer tends to throw at you in the first few chapters interchangeable, although I'm sure I would have noticed Mr. Spock, as the cover suggests.

I read the newest release by one of my very favorite authors, Jude Morgan (he's a guy!), Symphony, about the love affair between actress Harriet Smithson and Hector Berlioz, with whom he fell in love when he saw her in her signature role as Ophelia (in English) in Paris. She inspired him--I guess that's the right word, maybe it should be tormented him--to write the Symphonie Fantastique.

I discovered a new Irish writer called Tana French who writes modern Irish police procedurals; gorgeous, stylish, thought-provoking stuff. I lay on the sofa the day after Christmas and read her first book, In The Woods, and did nothing else all day. Blissful. I'd read her second, The Likeness, a few weeks before (I tend to read things out of sequence).

Early last year I had the interesting experience of reading, one after the other, two books on the same theme, modern retellings of the Orpheus legend--Gods Behaving Badly, the first novel by a smart, funny young English writer, Marie Phillips; and the beautiful, painful, eloquent Orpheus Lost by Janette Turner Hospital.

One book that was a major disappointment, but that translated into a wonderful movie, was The Jane Austen Bookclub (how about this one, Cara?). The writer(s) of the screenplay wisely took the author's copious telling and translated it into dialogue between the characters. A pity--this was a book I wanted to love.


As for nonfiction, I enjoyed Sultry Climes, a book about the Grand Tour, or the STD Tour, as it should really be known. Those enthusiastic young men often brought back more than a few pieces of statuary from their educational travels. I also found a new book about servants, Master and Servant by Caroline Steedman, a thought-provoking interpretation of master-servant relationships in the late 18th-century, based on the case of an elderly clergyman whose female servant became pregnant (it wasn't his child), and instead of righteously dismissing her, he kept her and the child in the house, doted on them, and provided for them both in his will.

I also discovered A Picture History of the Grenville Family of Rosedale House, a collection of watercolors by a young girl named Mary Yelloly, painted in the 1820s when she was between eight and twelve years of age. She only lived to be twenty-one, which gives a sweet poignancy to her pictures. The paintings were discovered and published only recently. You can read about the book here, and this is one of the paintings.

And here's something I hope you'll read and enjoy--I'm doing revisions for it at the moment--coming in May, my next book, A Most Lamentable Comedy, available from amazon.co.uk, and although it's not listed there yet, this UK site, The Book Depository, offers free shipping worldwide.


What are you reading? Plan to read? What books did you enjoy recently?

How I did on my 2008 reading resolutions

Now it’s my turn to be embarrassed. I just checked to see how I did on my Reading Resolutions for 2008 and see that I reached less than half my goals. Well, that leaves me some goals for this year, at least. :)

I didn’t end up reading as much romance as I wished. The problem is that when I’m writing or reading romance, I want to identify with the heroine and fall in love with the hero, but I can’t be in more than one imaginary couple at once! So I read during breaks in between drafts and on vacation, but my mess-in-progress has given me so much trouble I have not taken many breaks!

I did get to Laura Kinsale’s DREAM HUNTER and talked about it in my post on Lady Hester Stanhope. Now I have only one Laura Kinsale (SEIZE THE FIRE) left unread. Her website has a temporary image as a placeholder. It’s an exquisite image, but I’d love to see news of a new release!

As far as general fiction goes, I continued with my book discussion group. However, since many members were having trouble keeping up, our selections this year were selected based on brevity. Though I don’t think a book needs to be long to be gripping, somehow none of the selections excited me. And very few members read them anyway, which wasn’t the case when I first joined the group. Maybe it was me??? Anyway, I’ve decided life’s too short and I’m going to just read on my own now.

Another resolution I fell down on was to read more period fiction. I did, however, read a few more biographies, including GEORGIANA, which I talked about in an earlier post. Her life was certainly as exciting as any novel.


Another resolution was to read more fantasy. I’ve now read the first two books in Naomi Novik’s Temeraire series and look forward to more. They are brilliant and I adore the characters.


I also made great inroads on the Cornwell's Sharpe series. I recently finished SHARPE’S FURY, following Sharpe through the Battle of Barrosa in 1811, so I’m about half way through the series.


In the areas of creativity and inspiration, I didn't get to Joseph Campbell’s HERO WITH A THOUSAND FACES (a new goal for this year) but I did enjoy WOMEN WHO RUN WITH THE WOLVES by Clarissa Pinkola Estes. There’s lots of gold there, though it’s a bit wordy. A friend raves about the audiobook, which is a bit condensed, so that might be a good option for any of you who are curious.

And I still have not read anything about crop circles. Maybe this year…

Have you read any of these books? What did you think? Have you made any reading resolutions for 2009?

Anyone else singlehandedly take down a book discussion group? :)

Elena
www.elenagreene.com

High Seas Stowaway Winner!

The winner of a signed copy of High Seas Stowaway is...Greta! Send your address to us at riskies@yahoo.com

JANE AUSTEN MOVIE CLUB: Horatio Hornblower #1



Welcome to the January 2009 meeting of the Risky Regencies JANE AUSTEN MOVIE CLUB!

This is where we meet on the first Tuesday of every month to discuss adaptations of Jane Austen's works, and other Regency-interest film and TV productions.

(For info about what we'll discuss next, or to participate in any of our other discussions, just see the previous post!)

Today's discussion will be on the first installment of the ITV/A&E Horatio Hornblower series, which stars Ioan Gruffudd and Robert Lindsay.

Oh, and sorry about the awkward "#1" in the title of the post -- but as the first installment is called HORATIO HORNBLOWER: THE DUEL in the US, and HORNBLOWER: THE EVEN CHANCE in the UK, I was afraid that adding even half of that to the title would lead to Blogger meltdown and imminent nuclear war.

By the way, the fantastic screen captures shown here -- all from this episode -- are courtesy of the very neat website twoevilmonks.org. They have a useful and hilarious summary of the plot of THE DUEL/EVEN CHANCE, including these and more great pictures, which is well worth checking out.

To aid the discussion, here are some of the
major credits, with "you've seen him before here"
tidbits in green:

Ioan Gruffudd -- Horatio Hornblower

Gruffudd starred as Wilberforce in the recent film Amazing Grace.

Robert Lindsay -- Captain Sir Edward Pellew

Michael Byrne -- Capt. Keene

You may recognize Byrne as Major Nairn in the Sharpe series.

Jamie Bamber -- Midshipman Archie Kennedy

Before he starred in Battlestar Galactica, Bamber played Lord Tony in the Richard E. Grant-starring Scarlet Pimpernel.

Dorian Healy -- Midshipman Jack Simpson

Paul Copley -- Matthews

Simon Sherlock -- Oldroyd

Sean Gilder -- Styles

DIRECTOR: Andrew Grieve

SCREENPLAY: Russell Lewis
(Based on the C.S. Forester stories "Hornblower and the Even Chance," "Hornblower and the Cargo of Rice," and "Hornblower and the Man who Felt Queer.")



So...what did you think?

Did you like this Hornblower?

What do you think of the cast?

The script?

The special effects?

If you've read any of Forester, what do you think of the interpretation?

If you've seen the film MASTER AND COMMANDER, how do you think the two differ?


All answers welcome!

(And be sure to come back
on the first Tuesday of next month,
when we'll be discussing
the 1934 SCARLET PIMPERNEL!)


Cara
Cara King, who prefers tea to rum, and bagels to ship's biscuit





JANE AUSTEN MOVIE CLUB SCHEDULE

Our next four "meetings" of the Jane Austen Movie Club will be:

February 3: THE SCARLET PIMPERNEL (1934 -- Leslie Howard)

March 3: THE SCARLET PIMPERNEL (1982 -- Anthony Andrews)

April 7: THE MADNESS OF KING GEORGE

May 5: SHARPE'S RIFLES


And remember, none of our discussions ever really end...so if you missed a chance to comment on any of the adaptations we've already done, it's not too late!

If you're interested, our previous discussions were:


JANE AUSTEN ADAPTATIONS:

Pride and Prejudice (1940, 1980, 1995, 2005)
Sense & Sensibility (1995, 2008)
Northanger Abbey (1986, 2007)
Emma (1996, 1997)
Mansfield Park (1999, 2007)
Persuasion (1995, 2007)

MASTER AND COMMANDER
MISS AUSTEN REGRETS
THE DUCHESS
CLUELESS
CRANFORD
BRIDE AND PREJUDICE

(I plan to turn all the above into links, BTW...after I sleep...) :-)

Cara

Diane's Favorite Books of 2008

As you all know, I'm the slacker of the group, reading-wise, so I always feel a bit embarrassed when we do this Favorite Books of 2008 (which we'll be doing all week except for Cara who is doing Horatio Hornblower-lucky ducky-or maybe I'm the only one and I just forgot what we decided). I'm embarrassed because I haven't read a huge list of books.

This year I read my friends:



I loved all of these. I know I've read others but these came to mind first.
I have tons of friends' books on my TBR pile as well.

I read a fair amount about psychic phenomena because I had a story idea but I've tabled that for the moment.

I have TONS of Research books I wish I'd read and I shall provide you a partial list:

The Verneys by Adrian Tinnniswood. The Verneys apparently never threw out a piece of paper and thus amassed the largest and most complete record of correspondence in the world. Plus they had some interesting characters in the family, including a serial adulterer, an unwed mother, a hero, and a petty criminal.
I bought this book at nearly full price; now you can find it discounted

Rites of Peace by Adam Zamoyski.
I forgot where I bought this one, but I purchased it to learn about the Congress of Vienna.

The Making of Victorian Values by Ben Wilson
This book (whose author looks very very young) promises to talk about the transistion from the Georgian era to the Victorian. In other words, the Regency! I purchased this one at a book fair. Great bargain at $7.00

The Curate's Lot by A. Tindal Hart
I'm pretty sure I bought this from Dee Hendrickson who sold off her wonderful book collection. It will explain the life of a curate from medevial times to the twentieth century.

Tried by Their Peers by Rupert Furneaux
Somebody mentioned this book, probably on the Beau Monde loop and I promptly ordered it from abebooks.com. It relates trials in the House of Lords for such exciting things as poisoning, bigamy, divorce, dueling

George IV by Steven Parissien
Another bargain book and my latest acquisition. More about Prinny! What could be better.

I wish I'd read all of these in 2008, but now I can just aspire to read them in 2009. Stop by next year and see how I did.

What books do you wish you'd read in 2008?
When do you read? Do you read before going to bed? I do but I fall asleep.

Here are pics of the grandcats. Moscow masquerading as a chicken and PB the kitten.








Check out my website for new stuff!
Come visit the Wet Noodle Posse blog. We're focusing on Life this year.

A Look Behind the Book...


(Tomorrow, I'll be at eharlequin with a "talk like a pirate" forum where I'll share more about the characters and history of this book. Please pop in, so I won't be alone! To find it, go to eharlequin, then to Forums, Simply Series, and Ahoy Landlubbers! High Seas Stowaway with Amanda McCabe)

In the comments on yesterday's post, Keira asked if setting inspires story or vice versa. I guess the answer is--both! For High Seas Stowaway, it was two characters in need of the proper place to play out their tale. Bianca and Balthazar both gave up the riches of Venice to follow their own natures, to search out adventure and new, dangerous lands where they could find themselves and the chance for true love. They were both too stubborn and wild-hearted to be contained, even by a place as gorgeous as Venice! They needed the open sea and wild, lush islands--even if they do settle down eventually.

And I could follow my interest in sixteenth century exploration. I would never have wanted such an adventure for myself--I like hot water and knowing exactly where I am, not to mention knowing where my next meal is coming from (and having that meal NOT be weevil-infested hardtack)! But I love reading about it in tales of voyages like those of Magellan, Drake, and (later) Cook. I recently read the new book Champlain's Dream (which will be on an upcoming post of favorite books of 2008), and loved it. I've often wondered what kind of person would pack themselves into a tiny wooden ship, with no completely reliable means of navigation, and launch themselves out into the vast ocean. What would drive them? I found that person in Balthazar.

By 1535, when our story begins, the Spanish were just becoming well-established in the New World, and Santo Domingo on the island of Hispaniola (now shared by Haiti and the Dominican Republic) was its administrative capital. Though it had no gold or silver itself, it was located on the island's northwest coast between the Windward and the Mona passages, and thus was perfectly placed on the route between Mexico and Panama to Seville. Its port, at the mouth of the Ozama river, formed a natural protective harbor, with anchorage for dozens of ships. It became the main "staging area" for the flotas of treasure ships headed back to Spain, loaded with purloined silver, gold, emeralds, and pearls.

The gallows, where pirates hung rotting for all to see, held a prominent place above the harbor. And the lush, thickly vegetated central valleys of the island made the perfect hiding place for luckier pirates and runaway slaves! Buccans, or wild frontiersman (mostly of French extraction), lived there as well, hunting the wild pigs. Even though Hispaniola had no treasure, it did export sugar and hardwoods from those forests, and housed prosperous cattle ranches and rum distilleries.

And Santo Domingo was not just some rough "frontier town" (though it probably looked like one for someone fresh from Seville!). The governor at the time, Alonso de Feuonmayor, wanted to make his town as "Spanish" as possible. Between 1533 and 1536, he oversaw the building of a great cathedral (which can still be seen today), a fortress, and thick defebsive walls. The town was built atop an easily-defended hill, and given a very European look with houses and ramparts made of yellow stone and reddish-orange brick, with red-tiled roofs. Streets were cobbled, there was a central square, and church bells rang out every hour. A great place for an industrious and intelligent tavern owner like Bianca to prosper!

Another aspect I loved researching was ships and the life of the sea in the 16th century. It was rough, and sorta romantic (to read about anyway), full of a bold adventurous spirit that exactly suited Balthazar. (Though I did tend to gloss over some of the, shall we say, less pleasant aspects! No body odor and scurvy...)

Balthazar and his brother Marc (the hero of A Notorious Woman) are not pirates, though they battle them at times. They are merchants with a booming business and a license to trade in the New World. Balthazar's ship, the Calypso, is a caravel (like Columbus's Nina and Pinta). Caravels were smallish and lightly built, fast, responsive, and comparatively stable. Between 60 and 72 feet in length, with a raised quarterdeck and stern and 3 masts, 2 for square-rigged sails and 1 smaller for a lateen rig at stern, it could sail easily in crosswinds. It was nimble and versatile, cost-effective (with a relatively small crew), but also a bit cramped for space. This, of course, provided particular challenges for a romance writer...

When I visited those reproduction ships at Jamestown, I realized something. It would be difficult for Balthazar (who is quite tall) and Bianca (who is not petite) to be sufficiently passionate in that little cabin with its low ceilings and teensy berth. (Visiting research-relevant sites can be immensely helpful, but also can shatter some illusions!) And there would be no privacy at all. This was a challenge, yes, but not impossible. Not for those who are determined!

I learned so much from this book. What rough weather would feel like (I made myself feel a bit queasy thinking about storms), the diet and routine aboard ship, navigation (the use of objects like quadrants, compasses, the cross-staff and "dead reckoning"), careening, mapmaking. I also had to watch the Pirates of the Caribbean movies a few times, which is a tough job but I did it for the book...








A few sources I liked were:
Marcus Rediker, Villains of All Nations
Angus Konstam, The History of Pirates
Wayne Curtis, And a Bottle of Rum: A History of the New World in Ten Cocktails (yes, this was really research!!!)
Kenneth Andrews, The Spanish Caravel: Trade and Plunder
Carl Sauer, The Early Spanish Main
C.H. Haring, The Spanish Empire in America
Jan Rogozinski, A Brief History of the Caravel (a lucky $.50 library sale find!)
Mendel Peterson, The Funnel of Gold
Albert Marrin, The Sea King: Sir Francis Drake and His Times (much later than the time period of my book, but it was very useful for its descriptions of shipboard life and the calling to adventure and discovery)

The history of Spain (and France and England) in the New World is, of course, an extremely complex one, and mostly beyond the scope of my lighthearted story. I would love to revisit it one day, possibly for a work of historical fiction!

Mojito Recipe
2--3 oz rum
1 lime (juiced)
2 tsp sugar
2--4 mint sprigs
Soda water

Lightly muddle mint and sugar with a splash of soda water in a mixing glass until the sugar dissolves. Squeeze the lime into the glass, add the rum, and shake with ice. Strain over cracked ice into a highball glass, top off with soda water, garnish with a mint sprig, and enjoy!

What are some favorite spots you'd like to as story settings???

High Seas Stowaway!

After several days of holiday sloth, I have finally gotten up off the couch where I sat eating peppermint brownies and watching my new Mamma Mia! DVD for days. I turned in my latest book, and put away the Christmas decorations. And now I'm celebrating the release of High Seas Stowaway, the third in my "Renaissance Heroes Trilogy," by sitting down with my heroine Bianca Simonetti in her island tavern for a mojito and a chat...

"Smell the salt spray, feel the deck beneath your feet, and hoist the Jolly Roger as McCabe takes you on an entertaining, romantic ride!" -- RomanticTimes Book Reviews

Amanda: Hola, Bianca! It's so nice to see you again. It's been a while! How have you been?

Bianca: Quite well, no thanks to you! I'm fortunate to be here at all after everything you put me through. Tavern brawls, duels on desert islands, shipwrecks, pirates, sex in tiny ship's cabins...

A: Now, that can't have been all that bad! The lack of space surely meant more--innovation.

B: Well, aye, maybe that part wasn't so bad. There are certainly some interesting positions to try in a berth. And it's amusing to watch my shirtless amor Balthazar climb the rigging!

A: Exactly. The reviewer at RT says you jumped into bed with Balthazar too fast to be plausible.

B: What calumny!

A: Hey, I didn't say it! What do you think about that?

B: Ha! Have you seen Balthazar?

A: Of course! I invented him, remember? And I do see your point.

B: I was in love with him for years before we met again here in Hispaniola. Every girl in Venice was!

A: You didn't part well, though, did you? Way back then?

B: That was yet another trial you put me through! Making me fall in love with him, then parting us so cruelly and making me think I hated him. It was his father who was the villain, after all, not him. Want another mojito?

A: Thanks! It's very yummy, considering they won't be invented for a few more centuries.

B: I only have the best Santo Domingo rum here in my tavern. It's why I made such a success of it.

A: So, you came here to open a tavern after you ran away from Venice.

B: After a few detours. I traveled, married, worked, was widowed...

A: But you never forgot Balthazar. Hey, that is not an easy name to say after a mojito!

B: Here, have some more. Nay, I never forgot Balthazar. But you know that, having invented him and everything. He must be your dream man, too.

A: Sure. A lot of Orlando, a little Johnny Depp, a dash of Hugh Jackman. A difficult youth he had to overcome, intelligence, strength, a fiercely protective instinct toward his true love...

B: Plus a great fleet of ships, and his own tropical island! And he certainly knows how to handle that, er, astrolabe.

A: (giggling) Okay, what's in this drink anyway?

B: Our good Santo Domingo rum, sugar from our mills, lime juice, mint--and this odd bubbling concoction you brought with you.

A: Club soda!

B: It's wondrous stuff. Want another?

A: Why not? It's not every day I get to sit down with my own character! I like your velvet gown, by the way.

B: Thank you--we're doing quite well now that Balthazar has finally settled down!

A: Lucky you!

B: Thanks to you and these HEAs. Where did you find the idea for my tale, anyway?

A: Well, when I first met Balthazar in Marc and Julietta's story, A Notorious Woman, I knew I wanted to know more about him! He was very young and very angry for a man so handsome and so priviliged. That's when I found out how much he hated his father's evil-ness, and how much he wanted to explore the world and make his own fortune. I just didn't know what kind of woman he needed...

B: Until you met me!

A: Exactly! He needed a woman who would stand up to him, and not melt at his feet like every other lady in the world. A woman he could build a life with. I knew that would be you, despite your, er, rocky beginning with him. Plus I've always been fascinated by the early European New World. I wanted to find out more about it, and it seemed the perfect place for Balthazar.

B: And did you visit any island taverns like this one when you were discovering our tale?

A: Sadly, no. No beaches or tiki bars or anything fun like that. But I did visit Jamestown with my friend Diane Gaston, where we toured ships of almost the same design of Balthazar's Calypso, and so I was able to create the love scenes accurately...

B: Well, I am most grateful for that! Another mojito?

A: I don't mind if I do! Will you join me?

B: Happily! Salut, signorina. And good fortune for our book!


(That's not the end of our launch weekend! Join us tomorrow when I share more research tidbits and favorite sources for High Seas Stowaway. I'll give away a signed copy to one commenter this weekend! HSS is on shelves now, or available at eharlequin.com. Next week I will be at eharlequin with a Talk Like A Pirate-style chat week, be sure and join me there! Or join me January 15--my birthday!--at History Hoydens and Unusual Historicals. Excerpts and research info can be found at my own website, too...)

Risky Resolutions!


I am not ashamed--and never have been (check last year for proof)--to admit that I make resolutions. Classic ones, even, like lose weight, exercise more, and stop drinking so much damn coffee.

Okay, that one is so not going to fly. But the losing weight and exercise, that I am going to do (really. I usually do follow through).

And, since I do make Resolutions, it might be a good time to see how I did. Let's see . . . last year, I did lose weight (which I regained, but that just means a fresh Resolution for this year!), I did get an agent (!), although I haven't sold any books yet. I have caught up on sleep, somewhat, and yes, I have been having more sex (not that you asked).

This year, in addition to the usual things, I resolve to write more productively, waste less time, be a better friend and stop worrying about how many books I've been able to read, because fewer books read means more book written--theoretically, at least.

Maybe you've shared your resolutions already (I've been sleeping, 'member, so I haven't spent enough time at the computer lately), but what do you look forward to in 2009?


Megan

Happy New Year!

And what are you doing to celebrate?

First, I trust you let this man into your house last night. You really should have, you know. His sack carries coal or salt or something else I can't remember, providing you with plenty for the new year, although chances are in my neighborhood he'd dump the salt/coal and leave with your laptop.

Some particularly dedicated and hardy people celebrate New Year's Day by going swimming. Outside.

The Chicago Polar Bear Club has these rules:

1. Swimsuits only. No nudity (it's a family event) and no wetsuits (that's cheating).
2. Swimmers must go all the way under the water before coming out to be "official."
3. No whining!

On the left, the Lake View Polar Bears of Chicago in action, chunks of ice and all. Their motto is celebration of shrinkage. Yikes.

This insanity is practiced worldwide. On the right, the Berlin Seals put the old year behind them. It seems to be snowing and swimsuit optional.

Like Eleanor, I don't really believe in new year's resolutions. But this year I do want to continue to lose weight (hooray! although recently it's been a bit of a butterfest), to put the joy back in writing, and to be more generous in my time and resources to others.

How about you? What are you doing today and what are your plans for the new year? And is anyone going swimming today--I'd love to hear from you!
 
2005-2008 © Risky Regencies
Designed by Enchanted Web Style