Voice exercise

A while ago, Cara blogged about Words We Really Like and I admitted that I mostly see words as brushstrokes in a painting, important but not an obsession in themselves.

One reason is that character and plot matter more to me but another related reason is that I'm a very visual reader. When I'm reading fiction, my brain translates what I'm reading into a film in my head. If the author has done her job well, the words and paragraphs disappear. I become aware of them only if there's a snag in the process: a typo, a grammatical error, a clumsy point of view change.

It works the same way when I write. My rough drafts don't even approach being readable; they're just my way of figuring out and recording the film in my head. In fact, they would probably read like a confusing screenplay--were I to let anyone see them, that is!

The problem with this process is that when it comes time to put the scenes into words, I've forgotten how to do it. I worry that I no longer know how to break paragraphs, how to use adverbs (sparingly!), how to interleave description with action and dialogue, etc... And what's worse, I get this scary feeling that my writer voice is gone.

Classroom type exercises for finding writer voice haven't worked for me. I can't seem to do free writing with others around me (though I keep thinking I should try it in private). But the last time I felt this way I came up with an exercise that did help me. I selected snippets of well-written scenes from historical romances by a variety of favorite authors and then I didn't just reread them, I typed them out. For me, the act of typing made me focus on the words and how they're put together. It helped me figure out which elements of writing style felt natural to me, and just as importantly, which didn't, because the goal of the exercise was to learn from favorite romance authors like Jo Beverley, Julia Ross, Laura Kinsale, etc..., not blindly imitate them. That would be bad!

This weekend I'm going on a retreat with some local writing buddies. I plan to use the retreat to get started on the 4th (rubber-hits-the-road) draft of my balloonist story. I'm still hunting down some research details but tomorrow I may try this exercise again, because I'm definitely feeling rusty.

Anyone else out there a visual reader/writer? Are there any exercises you've found helpful to develop writer voice? Which authors have strong voices you enjoy?

Elena
www.elenagreene.com

Names, Names, Names

I've been brainstorming about names for a week or two, in between heat waves and book binges and headaches and out-of-town visitors.

I like finding the right sound for a character name, but I also like playing with connotations. In MY LADY GAMESTER, I named the hero's somewhat immature, rather weak younger brother Edmund -- hoping to draw on memories of either the Edmund in THE LION, THE WITCH & THE WARDROBE, or the one in MANSFIELD PARK (or both).

On the other hand, the heroine's younger brother was Tom. As opposed to Edmund, Tom was boyish, energetic, and none too sophisticated.

But right now, I'm figuring out names for my work in progress, which is a young adult novel (and, eventually, a loosely-linked series of young adult novels.) The first one has a lot of minor characters, so I need to find names which are memorable, distinct, and sound like the character they represent. And, if I'm lucky, the social group the character belongs to!

See, in the modern-day high school where my story takes place, there are two basic social groups I'm dealing with:

1) the group which, for lack of a better term, I'm currently calling the POPULAR KIDS, who are high-achieving, good-looking, athletic kids from well-to-do families; and

2) the group which for convenience sake I'm calling the NERDY KIDS, who are brainy and studious and come from more varied backgrounds than group #1.

However, I'm having a little bit of difficulty, so...if you could all help me out a bit, I'd really appreciate it!!! Could you let me know, on first seeing each of the following girl's names, which of the above two groups you would expect them to belong to? (Knee-jerk reaction here.)

Gretchen
June
Harmony
Nia
Wren
Jena
Wynne
Jazz
Tabitha
Holly
Wenda
Hope
Ivy
Jasmine
Winter
Jenny

Thank you all SO much!!!!


Cara
Cara King
, who hated her hard-to-spell-or-pronounce name as a kid

Congratulations to Keira!


You have won a signed copy of THE NAKED GENTLEMAN by Sally Mackenzie!

Please email riskies@yahoo.com to claim your prize.

Retreat 2008

'T is pleasant, through the loopholes of retreat, To peep at such a world... William Cowper

It was a pleasant Washington Romance Writers Retreat. This year we met in a new location, The Bolger Center, a lovely conference and training facility owned by the Postal Service. It used to be a convent and you could tell in places. The Stained Glass Room where we gathered as a whole group was obviously the chapel complete with confessionals in the back.

This statue of Samuel Osgood, the First US Postmaster General, stood in a location that must have once held a statue of the Virgin Mary or one of the saints.

On the whole it was a nice place. The air conditioning had not been turned on yet and, as happens in the Washington, DC, area sometimes, it was 80 degrees in April. So it was HOT. Then Sunday it was 60 degrees and was COLD.

I didn't see many workshops, except for one I moderated. Victoria Alexander, who will be the keynote speaker at RWA in San Francisco, spoke at the Retreat and did a "Chat With..." workshop. Here's Victoria with Kathryn Caskie, both lovely "original blondes". I went to another workshop with the publicist for Avon who talked about what an in house publicists does. Basically, an in house publicist works to get the word out about your book in ways that don't cost money. Magazine ads, for example, cost money; TV appearances, booksignings, newspaper articles don't.

Karmela Johnson and I coordinated the agent/editor appts, which is why I didn't go to workshops. I love doing this, though, because you get to know the agents and editors and you also get to help the nervous, hopeful writers who are pitching for the first time. but you miss most of the workshops .

I won a Tarot Card reading by Nora Roberts. I won this a few years ago and, like that time, her reading was all about home and family, all good things, but I think it is fascinating that this is what she sees at a writer's gathering when all we're thinking about is writing. The card that represented my husband was the King of Rods. He liked hearing that one!


We all donate baskets and items to raffle off as the last event of the weekend. Here is the one my friends Helen, Julie, Virginia and I donated. We called it It's All There in Black and White.






Here is what I won, a pink pearl bracelet.






We also have a Moonlight Madness. I bought a tote bag made by my friend Beth Holcombe and a wooden pen (you can't tell but it is stained tourquoise) made by my friend Denise's husband.

My favorite part of the Retreat is being with friends.

Photo 1 - Bookseller Cynthia Parker, me, and Gail Barrett


Photo 2 - Heidi Betts and Karen Anders

On Saturday we had the awards ceremony, including the Marlene awards, which I cannot report until they are officially announced, I've been told. So we should be able to say something by Tuesday.



On Saturday we also give out special awards, and the very best-est thing happened! I won the Nancy Richards-Akers Mentoring Award. Members make the nominations for this award and the Board decides who to award it to. I was nominated by more than one person, which was incredibly wonderful. I cried.....

At our Published Author forum we discussed blogging. I said I thought Risky Regencies had made more readers familiar with my name and my books. Nora Roberts said she'd rather spend her time writing books, but she enjoys responding to blogs. Some others seemed to take the entire process of blogging verrrrry seriously. I said I really do it because it is fun.

What would you like to know about the WRW Retreat?

Sally MacKenzie and The Naked Gentleman

The Riskies are delighted to have Sally MacKenzie visit us once again, this time to talk about her April release, The Naked Gentleman. The Naked Gentleman was selected as a Blue Ribbon Favorite of the month at Romance Junkies!



Q. Tell us about your latest book, The Naked Gentleman.

The Naked Gentleman is the fourth in my Naked series, but can be read independently, of course. (Bonus--Kensington has reprinted my backlist, so all the books are available again, even my first book, The Naked Duke.) Meg, the Gent’s heroine, first appeared in The Naked Marquis. She was one of those characters who leap off the page and demand their own story, but first I had to write her friend Lizzie’s tale, The Naked Earl. Meg also appears in that book, where she meets John Parker-Roth, her hero-to-be. As to the actual story, the back cover copy probably says it best:

John Parker-Roth cannot believe that marriage is necessary for his happiness. He would far rather pursue his interest in horticulture, but if one day he should find a female who shared his passion for flowers--a level-headed, calm sort of female--he might reconsider. Certainly the lovely young woman who has just tumbled into his lap will not do, as she possesses neither of these admirable qualities. Yet Miss Margaret Peterson does have many things in her favor. To begin with, she is a true English rose, blushing a delectable pink. And she is not entirely clothed. Her full mouth begs to be kissed. If only she would not wriggle so…oh, dear. He cannot ignore the sudden vision of her in his bed, but he must.

What? Is Meg actually asking him to kiss her? Well, well, well. John Parker-Roth is a gentleman, first and foremost. And he cannot turn down a lady’s request…

Q. What if anything was “risky” about The Naked Gentleman?

I love writing very nasty villains, but in the Gent I decided to try telling a story without the help of any truly dastardly characters. For an added challenge I brought back the “bad” girl from The Naked Earl as a secondary character to see if I could give her a happy ending.


Q. In the Naked Gentleman, both Meg Peterson and John Parker-Roth are plant enthusiasts. Are you a gardener yourself? Is that why you picked this interest for your hero and heroine?

HAHAHAHA...crash! Oops. Excuse me--I was laughing so hard I fell off my chair. I picked plants because I am insane! In real life, I avoid any up close and personal vegetative contact--plants make me reach for the allergy meds. All landscape work at the MacKenzie estate is handled by a hired army of blue-shirted garden and lawn guys.

I gave Meg her plant interest back when I was writing The Naked Marquis. I had a vague idea she might turn into a healer of sorts. Fortunately I shared this thought with a British friend who does know lots about plants and garden history--she clued me into the fact that I was teetering on the edge of a major anachronism. She kindly pointed me in the right direction. I hadn’t realized garden design was such a hot topic in the Regency and that people--often soldiers or clergymen in foreign countries--sent home new-to-England plant specimens, so the variety of greenery gracing English gardens was exploding during this time.


Q. How did you research the plants and flowers of the Regency period? Do you have any research sources to share with us?

My friend told me Penelope Hobhouse was one of the experts in this area. I found her Plants in Garden History (ISBN 1-86205-660-9) quite interesting and helpful. Another little gem I stumbled upon while prowling Amazon for sources was Seeds of Fortune by Sue Shephard (ISBN 0-7475-6066-8). It chronicles the story of the horticulturally significant Veitch family. I also got a copy of Mavis Batey’s Regency Gardens (ISBN 0-7478-0289-0). And I found lots of useful information in two “bibles” of Regency research: Regency Design 1790-1840 by John Morley (ISBN 0-8109-3768-9) and Regency Style by Steven Parissien (ISBN 0-7148-3454-8). Finally, Emily Hendrickson’s The Regency Reference Book has a section on gardens as well. And of course I poked around the internet!


Q. You’ve had a busy spring, attending the NINC conference in New York City, the Romantic Times convention is Pittsburgh, the NECRWA conference in Natick, MA, and our very own Washington Romance Writers Retreat, alas, not in Harpers Ferry this year. Tell us about one special thing that happened at these conferences or one special thing you learned.

I enjoyed all my travels (I ran into Risky Megan Frampton at NECRWA!), though I am totally beat now--and I have yet to master the art of writing on the road. Fortunately, my next deadline isn’t until June 1 and I’m in fairly good shape with that story...I think.

As to a special thing learned...well, maybe that the RT convention is not so very scary. I have to admit I was definitely nervous about going. I’m a bit of an introvert and the thought of costumes--and male cover models--makes me break out in hives. But it was really quite fun. I did avoid the Mr. Romance contestants (they were probably all my sons’ ages) and I made only a very token nod at costuming myself (a few beads, a few spangles on my head), but I had great fun observing the celebrations. (And I’m relieved to say I did NOT observe some of the “celebrations” mentioned on other blogs! Apparently I have a knack for avoiding anything risky in real life.) I saw many old friends--and some not-so-old friends from NINC and NECRWA--and I made a few brand new friends as well. I was on a panel moderated by my pal--and Diane’s pal--Kristina Cook (debuting in 2009 as Kristi Astor) that included Mary Balogh, Gaelen Foley, and fellow WRWers Kathryn Caskie and Sophia Nash. Very much fun. And Kim Lowe of Fort Meade fame (Diane and I went to the Officers’ Wives’ romance tea she organized last year) fortunately persuaded me to stop in at the author chat with Mary Balogh, Nicole Jordan, Mary Jo Putney, and Patricia Rice. It was wonderful. Kim also coordinated and emceed the SOS military mixer, a lovely tribute to veterans and their families--I was only sorry I came late from lunch and so missed hearing her husband, Air Force Lt. Col. Christopher Lowe, sing the national anthem. And of course, the book signing was another highlight--I love meeting readers. I also discovered, much to my surprise, that Pittsburgh is a very nice city. I had a wonderful view of the three rivers from my hotel room. But now I’m ready to stay home for a while.


Q. Tell us about your next project? Who gets naked next time?

Two guys get Naked in 2009!! The Naked Baron, scheduled to release in the spring, goes back to the year of The Naked Duke and tells the story of a couple whom readers met in The Naked Gentleman--as well as a new couple’s story. The Naked Laird, my first novella, will be out in February 2009 in Lords of Desire, an anthology with Virginia Henley, Victoria Dahl, and Kristi Astor (aka Kristina Cook). It’s set during the house party that takes place in the Baron, so I’m having “fun” figuring out how the Baron and the Laird will mesh. And then? Well, if all goes according to plan, I have a Naked Viscount waiting in the wings.

Sally is attending the Washington Romance Writers Retreat today—right down the road from where she lives. She’ll be popping in to say hi and answer questions in the late afternoon, ET.

And one lucky commenter will be selected at random to win a Naked Gentleman—a signed copy of Sally’s book, that is.

My New York Vacation Part Deux





As promised--pictures! Here is Megan on the lovely deck of her new house.

Jane Austen also enjoyed the house, especially sliding down the banisters...




The Metropolitan Museum (the Temple of Dendur, and the Nattier portrait that made an appearance on Project Runway!)







Central Park!








Parmigianino's Antea at the Frick (not my own pic--no photos allowed!)...


...And Emma Hamilton at the Frick
















A Rowlandson print from the Yale Center for British Art (again, no photos allowed! And no pointing, either)


It was a busy few days, yet I still only got to see a fraction of what I wanted! Maybe next year...







And, since it's the anniversary of the day Shakespeare was baptized (April 26, 1564 at Holy Trinity Church in Stratford), here is one of my favorite monologues from Romeo and Juliet:

Come night; come, Romeo; come, thou day in night;
For thou wilt lie upon the wings of night
Whiter than new snow upon a raven's back.
Come, gentle night; come, loving, black-browed night;
Give me my Romeo; and, when he shall die,
Take him and cut him out in little stars,
And he will make the face of heaven so fine
That all the world will be in love with night
And pay no worship to the garish sun.



So, happy late birthday, Shakespeare! What is your favorite Shakespeare play? Or your favorite spots to visit in New York? (I'm making my list for the next trip...)

And don't forget--A Sinful Alliance is still on shelves. Including the Borders in Fairfield, CT! And on May 19, Alex Logan, my new editor at Grand Central Publishing, is going to join us here at Risky Regencies to talk about GCP's romance program and answer questions. Don't miss it!

Good News! (for me, at least)


Hey! It's another solipsistic post from Megan! What else is new?

Anyway. Ahem. A few weeks ago, I posted the first few paragraphs of Road to Passion, my Regency-set historical about an opium-addicted Marquess and an illegitimate vicar's daughter.

A few weekends ago, I pitched same to an agent at the fine New England Conference.

I just accepted an offer of representation from said agent, who will be sending RTP out just as soon as I do a few minor revisions. So maybe you guys will get to read the rest, eventually.

This also means I have to get off my butt and write. Road to Desire, to be exact.

How do you celebrate good news? Shopping? Champagne? A well-deserved nap?

Mozart or Beethoven?


Following on from Elena's post about her enviable concert experiences, one thing that has always fascinated me is how different writers (and musicians) produce.

So are you a Beethoven or a Mozart?

Here's Mozart's manuscript for K. 617, Adagio and Rondo for glass harmonica, flute, oboe, viola, and cello.

The glass harmonica was an instrument that plays on the principle of running your finger around the top of a wine glass to produce a beautiful humming, otherworldly sort of sound. The Metropolitan Opera used a glass harmonica for the mad scene in their recent production of Lucia di Lammermoor--here's an article from the NY Times about it. It's usually played on the flute since they're aren't that many glass harmonicas around now--or people who know how to play them. This instrument was made in 1785.

But I digress. Here's one of Beethoven's scores.

The point I'm trying to make (yes, there is one) is that Mozart was notorious for composing in his head and then just writing it all down; or writing the music down after he'd improvised it at a concert. So his scores, although they have a certain messiness from writing fast, tend to be very clean. Whereas Beethoven used the delete key a lot, scribbling out and, although you can't see this here, digging his nib into the paper with splattery results--all sturm und drang.

So for the writers among us, who's a Beethoven and who's a Mozart?

And for everyone, did you hear the Met broadcast of Lucia? (I missed it, to my great annoyance.) And what's your favorite instrument?

Catching Up

After a week away, I'm just starting to catch up on laundry and emails, but I can't help adding my tuppence to all the discussions you've all had while I was away.

I agree with Cara on Pace vs Depth; I like stories that occasionally slow (though not stop) for world-building and character development. I find that uniformly frenetic pacing can become boring in its own right. In a romance I also want to see some glimpses of the HEA.

Diane's post A Character in Possession of a Good Motto provoked thoughts and smiles. The closest I've come to character mottos was in thinking about how the characters in LADY DEARING'S MASQUERADE would react to being imprisoned. Livvy would carve poetry into the walls to keep herself sane; Jeremy would risk death to try to escape.

Janet's Let's Talk About Summer had me looking forward to RWA. It's been far too long since I've met with my fellow Riskies and there are so many of our regular visitors I am looking forward to meeting in person! Oh, and that cover is very Barbie but the girliness is not necessarily a bad thing. :)

And Megan's That Fresh Feeling and Amanda's What I'm Doing on my New York vacation had me wishing I could be there with them, soaking up all the artsy inspiration and good writing vibes. And one can never view too many gratuitous Sean Bean images.

As for what I have been doing, I was in Florida visiting my in-laws. Take three parts Mr. Woodhouse, two parts Mrs. Bennet, add a dash of Sir Walter Elliot, shake well and reincarnate as an elderly Jewish couple and you get the idea. I love them dearly but I was also glad we planned some good outings.

One day (and many $$$) were spent at Epcot with the kids. Expensive, only lightly educational but fun, especially pigging out at the country exhibits: shawarma and hummus at Morocco (yum!) and chocolate eclairs in France (yum again).

I also took my budding violinist to see Pinchas Zukerman perform with the Florida Orchestra. He conducted the entire concert and played a Mozart violin concerto, looking very relaxed and happy wearing what appeared to be black silk pajamas. We had 2nd row seats (not ideal for sound balance but great for viewing nuances of technique) and my daughter gazed up at him as if he were a god--and he pretty much played like one.

The helpful string expert at the music store where we rented a violin alerted us to a performance of Mahler's 2nd Symphony by the Bach Festival Orchestra. I hadn't heard much Mahler before, perhaps because symphonies that extend far beyond the typical 4 movements are less likely to be played on classical stations. My local orchestra, the Binghamton Philharmonic, hasn't ever performed a Mahler symphony, at least not while I've lived in the area. But wow! There's a whole world in that music. Must hear more.

Anyway, what has everyone else been doing this past week? What's your favorite ethnic food? What do you think of Mozart? Mahler? Do you have any relations who remind you of Jane Austen characters?

And don't forget, it's the last day of our Great Tagline Contest. If you haven't done so already, enter your vote for the chance to win a $25 Amazon gift certificate! Click here for full contest details.

Elena
www.elenagreene.com

Austen Idol

Have you ever wondered what it would have been like, if Jane Austen had written a novel about American Idol?

No? Why ever not?

Sorry, "I'm not crazy" is not sufficent explanation. Because I know you've all been wondering!

Lucky for you, that's just what today's post is. In the spirit of Austen Trek, here's...

AUSTEN IDOL. Or, if Jane Austen Wrote American Idol.

After Jason Castro ended his performance, the applause was notable.

Ryan Seacrest turned to the judges. "And what did you think of the young gentleman’s performance, Mr. Jackson?"

Randy Jackson nodded. "He has as good a kind of hair as ever lived, I assure you. Ah. Jason Castro. A slightly pitchy voice, but there is not a bolder hairstyle in America!"

"And is that all you can say for him?" cried Mr. Seacrest, indignantly. "But what is his vocal technique on more intimate acquaintance? What his tastes, his talents, and genius?"

Mr. Jackson was rather puzzled.

"Upon my soul," said he, "I do not know much about him as to all THAT. But he is a pleasant, good humoured fellow, and whenever I see him, I shout 'Dog' with great exuberance.”

Now it was Mr. Seacrest’s turn to be puzzled. “Sir?”

“Dog! After all, he has got the nicest little black bitch of a pointer I ever saw. Will she be performing later today?"

With more precision than elegance, Ryan Seacrest then turned to the lady seated next to Mr. Jackson. “Would you be so kind as to share your opinion on Mr. Castro’s performance, Miss Abdul?”

Paula Abdul beamed. "Oh! my dear Mr. Seacrest, how are you this evening? And my dear Mr. Castro--I come quite over-powered. Such a beautiful head of hair! You are too bountiful!”

“But what,” persisted Mr. Seacrest, “did you think of his singing?”

“Well!” cried Miss Abdul. “That was brilliant indeed!--Mr. Castro was admirable!--Excellently contrived, upon my word. Nothing wanting. Could not have imagined it.--Such pretty hair!-- Randy, Randy, look!--did you ever see any such thing? Oh! Mr. Castro, your dear mother will not know her own child again. I saw her as I came in; she was standing in the entrance. `Oh! Mrs. Castro,' said I--but I had not time for more."

“I...see,” said Mr. Seacrest, after a confused pause. “And...Mr. Cowell? What were your thoughts upon hearing Mr. Castro sing without either backup singers or band?”

Simon Cowell scowled. “To sing three notes, or four notes, or five notes, or whatever it is, while playing the ukelele, and alone, quite alone! what could he mean by it? It seems to me to shew an abominable sort of conceited independence, a most country-town indifference to decorum. I could hardly keep my countenance. Very nonsensical to perform without a band! Why must he be scampering about the stage, pretending that he knows how to play that undernourished second-rate guitar? And with his hair so untidy, so blowsy!"

“Oh, come now,” cried Mr. Seacrest. “You cannot have seen such lack in his performance!”

“How could I not? And the cruise ship on which he is doomed to perform; I hope you saw his cruise ship, six inches deep in mud, I am absolutely certain; and the hair which had been let down to hide it not doing its office. He has nothing, in short, to recommend him, but having an inexplicably popular coiffure. I shall never forget his performance this evening. He really sounded almost wild."

Ryan Seacrest looked exceedingly at sea, and without the safety of the oft-mentioned cruise ship to keep him from drowning. “Very well, Mr. Cowell. If you think that Mr. Castro’s singing is lacking, then pray tell: what does it lack? What do you require in a singer if you are to bestow your praise?”

“Certainly," cried Simon Cowell, “no singer can be really esteemed accomplished, who does not greatly surpass what is usually met with. A vocalist must have a thorough knowledge of music, singing, drawing, dancing, and the modern languages, to deserve the word; and besides all this, he must possess a certain something in his hair and manner of phrasing, the tone of his voice, his it-factor and song choice, or the word will be but half deserved."


So....what do you think? How did you like my "casting"?

All comments welcome!

By the way, I forgot to announce the next topic of discussion for the Jane Austen Movie Club! Because we all need to catch our breaths (or, at least, I do), on May 6 (first Tuesday of the month!) we will all share lists of our favorite Austen adaptations, favorite performances, and that sort of thing. Please join us!

Cara
Cara King, whom Miss Bingley would think sadly unaccomplished

The sleeping woods

A noise like of a hidden brook
In the leafy month of June
That to the sleeping woods all night
Singeth a quiet tune -- Samuel Taylor Coleridge, The Ancient Mariner. Part v

My we were a quiet bunch last week. After the explosion of 59 comments to Keira's guest blog, things became unusually quiet. Not only here but on the Wet Noodle Posse blog as well. And on my loops.

Many people were at RT, I'm sure, but I've been to RT and not that many people attend. Most of the Riskies were out of town. I think Janet and I were the only ones staying at home.

Because of the quiet, we're going to extend our tagline contest. The new deadline is Wednesday, April 23.

This gives me an opportunity to ask, what would you like us to be talking more about at Risky Regencies?

Do you want more about writing? About Research? About our lives? Do you like our selection of Guest Bloggers?

This is a chance for you to tell us What Risky Regency Readers Want. Spill

A bit of follow-up.
Remember my blog about the Gerard Butler Charity Convention?
The Convention raised $30,451.92!! The money is donated to Kids Kicking Cancer.

Here's a photo of Patty and me at the banquet with our lunchboxes.


What I'm Up To Next:
Next weekend is our Washington Romance Writers Spring Retreat. Usually we have the Retreat in Harpers Ferry, WV, in an old historic hotel called Hilltop House. In the last year, Hilltop House was sold to new owners who are busy renovating and WRW was out of the location that has housed the Retreat continously since about 1998 (and many years before that). Our Board and Retreat Committee did a masterful job of finding The Bolger Center, in very nearby Potomac, MD. It is costing us more, but at least we will be able to meet.

Our main speakers are Victoria Alexander and Kresley Cole (see Kresley's Author Talk interview here) and we'll have workshops by Margie Lawson, Pam Spengler-Jaffee, Director of Publicity, Paperbacks at William Morrow/Avon, Karen Rose, Mariah Stewart, and our own talented members...Elizabeth Holcombe, Kathleen Gilles Seidel, and Denise McInerney. We also put our visiting agents (Elaine English, Emmanuelle Alspaugh, Becca Stumpf) and editors (Tracy Farrell, Lucia Macro, Kate Duffy, and Jennifer Enderlin) to work on workshop panels and in individual and group interviews. Kathleen Gilles Seidel always opens the Retreat with a terrific speech and Nora Roberts closes with one equally terrific...but different.

Anything you want me to find out for you at the Retreat? Anything besides discovering if O Doggie One (aka doglady) wins the Historical category of the Marlene, that is?

Tagline Contest Extended!

Greetings! We've decided to extend the deadline for our contest for anyone returning from RT or other parts.

You now have until Wednesday, April 23rd, to vote for your favorite tagline for the blog--or suggest another. You will be entered to win a $25 Amazon gift certificate!

The candidates:

1. A great deal of conversation and a liberality of ideas (Austen, Persuasion)

2. A Regency salon for readers and writers

3. The first Regency Romance Blog...and still the best

4. The original, riskiest, and forever the friskiest Regency Romance Blog

Send an e-mail to riskies@yahoo.com with TAGLINE in the subject line and in the body of the e-mail, please put your name, your favorite tagline, and, if you're feeling inspired, your own suggestion. One entry per person, please.

At close of voting, April 24, the Riskies will put their heads together and come up with a winner, to be announced in May. Or possibly two winners ... because we'll have a random drawing from all entries; and if we choose your tagline, you'll get a prize too.

Good luck and have fun!

The Riskies

What I'm Doing on My New York Vacation

What i've done on my vacation (so far!):

1) Helped Megan unpack and move books (she may think I'm being helpful, but really I'm scheming ways to steal her research collection. Bwa-ha-ha!!!)

2) Pestering Megan to start her new book

3) Having lunch with editor and agent. Pretending for two hours to be a reasonably professional and socially presentable person (I did not even squeal when given some free books! Yay!)

4) Visiting the Frick Collection, looking at Parmigianino's painting "Antea" and standing in the Fragonard room, pretending it's mine. All mine!

5) Going to the Yale British Art Center with Andrea Pickens and looking through boxes full of Regency-era satirical prints and Gainsborough drawings

6) Gawking at people on the train

More next week, complete with pictures!

That Fresh Feeling!


Today--today!--I will open up a new Word document and start writing Road to Desire, the next book in my vastly imagined Road series.

Yay!

And I owe it all to Amanda McCabe. Let me explain. Amanda is in New York City for business and meetings and such, and is staying in our office/guestroom (which for Amanda's purposes is a guestroom/office), and she and I and Andrea Pickens went out for a splendiferous meal on Wednesday. As writers do, we talked about writing and our next projects (Amanda is about to turn in one book, will begin another; Andrea just agreed to another trilogy with Grand Central), and I? Well, I had to admit I hadn't written for months.

So the pressure started. Good pressure. "You're going to start writing, right?" Amanda asked later in her surprisingly low, not so surprisingly mellifluous voice.

"Mm," I murmured noncommittally.

"Right?"

"Yeah, of course, right," I said in a firmer tone.

So here I am. Of course I have a gazillion things to do before that precious moment, but it will happen, sometime today.

Thanks, friends!

(And friends, please vote in our Risky Regency tagline contest. Details here.

Let's talk about summer

This is strictly speaking a fall event, when the UK edition of The Rules of Gentility is released by Little Black Dress UK--their first ever historical. But here's the cover, with a whopping big typo on it because designers can't spell. Isn't it cute ... and pink. Very pink. Girly. I like it.

And my horn-tooting over, I want to talk about summer even though it's only April. What are your plans?

I walked from work to the Metro in gorgeous weather--sunny and in the seventies (divine intervention--the Pope is in town, with nuns leaping out of birthday cakes yesterday and forming cheerleader squads at a mass Mass in the new baseball stadium today). The cherry blossoms were giving way to azaleas, and all I could think was oh my god I don't have any sunscreen.

That's on the list. Plus, summer pants. I wore mine to travel to Dallas last year for Nationals and upon arrival found they had a huge hole in the butt and my luggage was lost. I kept my knees together until my suitcase arrived. And t-shirts. Why aren't there any cotton t-shirts in nice colors anywhere this year??? For less than a small fortune, that is. Another question, why can't I wear a cream-colored t-shirt (not that I can find one this year) without spilling something truly horrible on it within minutes which will never wash out?

So, salvage not-too-stained t-shirts from last year. Find sunhat which my daughter hates (but isn't nearly as silly as this one) and has probably hidden somewhere. Find stain remover in travel form (I know I have one somewhere) to anticipate future food/tea disasters.

When I came home I looked at the wreck that is my front yard and decided I must get out there, even thought I have to write, because in a couple of months it will be too hot and mosquito-y to do anything.

What are your summer plans? If you're a writer, are you attending RWA National in San Francisco this year? Are you planning a real vacation? I'm not, as far as I know, and the plans to visit My Father Who Is Not a Tree in England are on hold until I actually have some cash freed up.

Tell us about what you'll be doing this summer--and apologies for this being so late. Blogger has been a very naughty boy today.

A Character in Possession of a Good Motto

It is a truth universally acknowledged, that a character in possession of a good motto, must be in want of Conflict.

Pop over to the Wet Noodle Posse blog today. Superromance author Susan Gable is discussing how writing a character's motto can help in creating conflict. I thought it would be fun to write the mottos of some of Jane Austen's characters:

From Sense and Sensibility:
Elinor: Do what must be done and keep your emotions to yourself.
Edward: A man must honor his promises.
Marianne: We are nothing without feelings.
Willoughby: We are nothing without fortune.






From Emma:

Emma: The course of true love needs my help
Mr. Knightly: People must be understood for who they are.
Harriet: My course of true love needs Emma's help
Frank Churchill: Be charming and witty on the outside, manipulative and selfish on the inside.
Jane Fairfax: I can be manipulated.




Pride & Prejudice:
Lizzie: My good opinion is formed quickly.
Darcy: My good opinion is rarely given
Jane: My good opinion is given to everybody
Bingley: My good opinion is given to everybody unless Darcy says differently

Do you like this idea of character mottos? It is one I think I can do!
Try it on your characters...or on Jane Austen's.

Don't forget to vote in our tagline contest. Details here.

Also pay a visit to the Romance Vagabonds. They are having an entire week focusing on Harlequin Historicals with lots of authors participating, lots of prizes, and a blog by editor Joanne Carr on Friday.

Pace vs. Depth

I first started reading Lord of the Rings when I was ten. I loved what I read, but partly through the first book, when Frodo and his friends were at Bree, I put it down and didn't pick it up again for a year.

My older brother, who influenced much of my reading, was not happy. "But you kept telling me you loved it!" he argued. "Why did you stop? You were just telling me how funny it was, how you loved the part at Bree when they were celebrating!"

And it was true. I'd put the book down at what was perhaps the lightest point in the book. Of course, now, I can look back and realize there was a reason I hadn't put the book down when Frodo was about to be captured by Ringwraiths, or eaten by an evil tree, but at a point where the tension was relatively low...where he and his friends were (to my ten year old mind) safe and happy.

So this offers support to the oft-repeated advice: keep your characters in trouble, the tension high, the suspense building.

However...

I've been questioning that recently.

Or, at least, questioning some of the advice that often goes along with that, such as: give your characters one hell of a hard time. Make their greatest fears come true. Keep them always off-balance. Don't let them win till the end. Start with a bang, with a serious problem, and just keep building the suspense, the drama, the trauma, until at the black moment all is lost...

And, sure, I can see that that can lead to a heck of a page-turner, at least with a protagonist the reader cares about. But is that all there is to life, to novels, and everything?

What about the part of the novel that sticks with you? I can remember gorgeous banquets in Oz, poetry in Middle Earth (and getting drunk at Bree), happy family scenes in Frederica, more banquets at Hogwarts (I guess I love food!), delightfully silly plotless dialogue in Northanger Abbey...

When a reader remembers the world in a book and thinks "I wish I lived there," I think there's more going on than breathless page-turning heart-pumping pace. There's color, and life, and texture. Music. Magic. Depth.

Which is not to say that I'm against pace. Or plot. Or excitement. But nowadays, I think I want to read both.

And I want to write both.

As with everything else, it's the balance that's hard. But I'm resolved not to write a book that's just plot point A, plot point B, turning point, turning point, etc etc. I want to write a world that's real, a world that's interesting...a world with banquets.

What do you think? Does a consistently tight pace make a novel's world shallower, or do you think that's a false duality? If you think there's something in it, which do you prefer?

All answers welcome!

(N.B. -- I'm actually out of town right now on sudden family business, so I may or may not be able to answer comments in a timely fashion...but I'll stop in as soon as I can!)


Cara
Cara King, author of MY LADY GAMESTER, in which the pace pauses for an elephant

The Great Tagline Contest!


Which one will you choose?

Vote for your favorite tagline for the blog--or suggest another, April 14-21, and be entered to win a $25 Amazon gift certificate!

1. A great deal of conversation and a liberality of ideas (Austen, Persuasion)
2. A Regency salon for readers and writers
3. The first Regency Romance Blog...and still the best
4. The original, riskiest, and forever the friskiest Regency Romance Blog

Send an e-mail to riskies@yahoo.com with TAGLINE in the subject line and in the body of the e-mail, please put your name, your favorite tagline, and, if you're feeling inspired, your own suggestion. One entry per person, please.

At close of voting, April 21, the Riskies will put their heads together and come up with a winner, to be announced in May. Or possibly two winners ... because we'll have a random drawing from all entries; and if we choose your tagline, you'll get a prize too.

Good luck and have fun!

The Riskies

Blame It On Gerry, by Keira Soleore

It is my distinct honor and pleasure to be a guest blogger here! The Risky Regencies are the blog of my heart, the blog that along with Squawk Radio introduced me to the romance community and fired up my desire to write.

I started reading RR in June of 2006. In those early days I couldn't muster up the courage to comment on any of the posts. However, when Gerard Butler as Beowulf graced the pages of RR, I couldn't stop myself!

That first comment emboldened me to visit daily, leave more comments, then comment on the comments by others. (Note from Risky Regencies: You see how commenting is a slippery slope!!) Here's how the first week went:

On July 3, Diane wrote The Gerard Butler Post
On Tuesday, Cara blogged about Period Views of America, hilarious quotes by Americans of "our" period in honor of Independence Day.
Then Elena talked about Roughing It describing a flooding disaster that struck her home and actually made me weep.
Janet's discussion about How Literate We Are according to the top 30 books of British librarians was a surefire "Uh=oh!" for me.
Megan's recounting of the events of her son's birthday had me wishing she would organize my daughter's party.
Amanda finished up the week with A Brief History of Soccer in honor of the World Cup.

You can see why I was hooked. How could I not be?!

The Riskies vary widely in their hobbies and interests, but are united by their love of history, books, and writing. I have learned so much from them. Diane and Amanda introduced me to craft of writing, the ups and downs of the writing life, and the modern joys of Project Runway and Dancing With the Stars. Cara added to my 3-year long Netflix list with all the versions of Jane Austen movies, made me into a cardsharp 200 years removed, and delighted me with her brilliant Austen Trek.

Elena showed me how to write from the heart, how to balance writing with motherhood, and how to serve colored meals for holidays (red food for Valentine's Day, orange for Halloween, etc). If blog posts were to have emotions, Janet's posts would always be smiling, for instance this and this. If there's anything about the servant life in the 1800s that Janet doesn't know, then it's not worth knowing. From Megan I discovered that Clive Owen has hundreds of publicity headshots, everyday life can be fashionable, and it's alright to be sad or silly, but for heaven's sake don't be boring!

A year and a half later, I'm still here, chatting just as much as before! In the course of dedicated blogging by the Riskies and their guests (with a special shout-out to Todd and our dear beau Bertie), I have made fast friends who'll see me into the next decade and beyond.

If I've made a small contribution to the Risky community, then I'm indeed blessed. Ladies, thank you from my soul and the soles of my feet for having me here!

Keira Soleore can be found in many (many!) spots in the online writing world! She's the board moderator for Candice Hern's message board, she's at her own website, and at her blog Cogitations and Meditations (see the links on Risky Regencies!). If you wish to nosh about Top Chef, email her straightaway.

A Tale of Two Palaces

Happy Saturday, everyone! We have so many exciting things coming up on Risky Regencies--a contest (stay tuned this week for the announcement!); a Guest Blogger visit tomorrow from Keira Soleore; and next week I will be in New York, staying with Risky Megan (so I can report on her new house firsthand!). Also, if you'd like to win a signed copy of A Sinful Alliance, I will be at Unusual Historicals for one more day. Be sure and visit! Oh, and I finally wrote "The End" on my Caribbean/Balthazar book this week!!! Chocolate all around. :)

And, since I had absolutely no idea what to talk about today (trying to do laundry so I can pack my suitcase!), I decided to pull out some of the research I did for ASA. Can't let it go to waste, after all! Here is a story of the 2 palaces that appear in the book, Greenwich and Fontainebleau.

Greenwich was originally built in 1433 by Humphrey, Duke of Gloucester, a brother of Henry V. It was a convenient spot for a castle, 5 miles from London and Thames-side, and was popular with subsequent rulers, especially Henry VIII. His father, Henry VII, remodeled the place extensively between 1498-1504 (after dispatching the previous occupant, Dowager Queen Elizabeth, to a convent). The new design was after the trendy "Burgundian" model, with the facade refaced in red Burgundian brick. Though the royal apartments were still in the "donjon" style (i.e. stacked rooms atop rooms), there were no moats or fortifications. It was built around 3 courtyards, with the royal apartments overlooking the river and many fabulous gardens and mazes, fountains and lawns.

At the east side of the palace lay the chapel; to the west the privy kitchen. Next door was the church of he Observant Friars of St. Francis, built in 1482 and connected to the palace by a gallery. This was the favorite church of Katherine of Aragon, who wanted one day to be buried there (of course, that didn't turn out quite as she planned...)

Though there are paintings and drawings of the exterior, not much is known of the interior decorations. The Great Hall was said to have roof timbers painted with yellow ochre, and the floors were wood, usually oak (some painted to look like marble). The ceilings were flat, with moulded fretwork and lavish gilding, embellished with badges and heraldic devices (often Katherine's pomegranates and Henry's roses). The furniture was probably typical of the era, carved dark wood chairs (often an X-frame design) and tables, benches and trunks. Wool or velvet rugs were on the floors of the royal apartments only, but they could also be found on tables, cupboards, and walls. Elaborate tiered buffets showed off gold and silver plate, and treasures like an gold salt cellar engraved with the initials "K and H" and enameled with red roses.

For the events in my book, the visit of the French delegation, two new structures were built at either end of the tiltyard, a grand banquet house, and a theater where there were masques and concerts.

Many important events of the era took place at Greenwich. Henry VIII was born there on June 28, 1491, and he married Katherine of Aragon there in May 1511. On February 8, 1516 Princess Mary was born there, followed on May 13 by the marriage of the king's sister Mary, Dowager Queen of France, to Charles Brandon, Duke of Suffolk (a huge source of much gossip!). In 1527 came the French delegation which forms the center of my book. They were received with much pomp "and entertained after a more sumptuous manner than has ever been seen before" (according to one courtier). On September 7, 1533, Princess Elizabeth was also born there, followed nearly 3 years later by the arrest of her mother Anne Boleyn after a tournament. One of the last great events Greenwich saw in Henry's reign was the wedding to Anne of Cleves in 1540.

It was a royal residence through the reign of Charles I (1625-49), but under the Commonwealth the state apartments were made into stables, and the palace decayed. In 1662, Charles II demolished most of the remains and built a new palace on the site (this later became the Royal Naval College), and landscaped Greenwich Park. The Tudor Great Hall survived until 1866, and the chapel (used for storage) until the late 19th century. Apart from the undercroft (built by James I in 1606) and one of Henry VIII's reservoir buildings of 1515, nothing of the original survives.

Fontainebleau, on the other hand, can be seen in much the state Francois I left it in. On February 24, 1525 there was the battle of Pavia, the worst French defeat since Agincourt. Many nobles were dead, and king was the prisoner of the Holy Roman Emperor in Madrid. He was released in May, but only at the price of exchanging his sons (Dauphin Francois and Henri, duc d'Orleans) for his own freedom. In May 1526, Francois created the League of Cognac with Venice, Florence, the Papacy, the Sforzas of Milan, and Henry VIII to "ensure the security of Christendom and the establishment of a true and lasting peace." (Ha!!) This led to the visit of the delegation in 1527, seeking a treaty of alliance with England and the betrothal of Princess Mary and the duc d'Orleans.

After his return from Madrid, Francois was not idle. Aside from plotting alliances, he started decorating. Having finished Chambord, he turned to Fontainebleau, which he loved for its 17,000 hectares of fine hunting land. All that remained of the original 12th century castle was a single tower. Francois built new ballrooms, galleries, and a chapel, and called in Italian artists like Fiorentino, Primaticcio, and Vignola to decorate them in lavish style (some of their work can still be seen in the frescoes of the Gallery of Francois I and the bedchamber of the king's mistress the duchesse d'Etampes). The marble halls were filled with artworks, gold and silver ornaments, and fine tapestries. Unlike Greenwich, this palace was high and light, filled with sunlight that sparkled on the giltwork.

A few sources I used a lot with this book are:
--Tournaments: Jousts, Chivalry, and Pageants in the Middle Ages, Richard Barber
--Excavations of Greenwich Palace, 1970-1971, PW Dixon
--Tudor Food and Pastimes, FG Emmison
--The Six Wives of Henry VIII
, Antonia Fraser (there are LOTS of books on this subject, of course, but Fraser's is great!)
--Prince of the Renaissance: The Life of Francis I, Desmond Seward
--Food and Feast in Tudor England, Alison Sim (yes, I do like researching food!)
--The Royal Palaces of Tudor England: Architecture and Court Life, 1460-1547, Simon Thurley
--Henry VIII: The King and His Court, Alison Weir (full of wonderful info!)
--Henry VIII and His Court, Neville Williams

I know it's hard to comment on a research-type post, but I'm curious--after reading about both palaces, which would you prefer to live in? (I'm torn, but I lean toward Greenwich). Where would you like to see a book set?

See you next week from New York!

Risky Business


“She’s a virgin, gentlemen. And she’ll be sold to the highest bidder.”

Alasdair raised his head from the worn wooden table, struggling to open his eyelids. He lifted his hand from where it had been dangling by his side and pried his left lid open, propping his head up on his right hand. The words had registered only vaguely, but they were enough to pull him from his miasma. The man who’d spoken was standing on the largest of the tables in the pub, his loud checked-waistcoat and over-oiled hair proclaiming his well-intentioned gentlemanly aspirations. The man bowed, spreading his hands wide and smiling.


This is the first paragraph of my finished manuscript, Road To Passion, which I am sending out to agents for potential representation. Agents are considering me at this very moment, but a few have already passed, commenting that they are concerned about an opium-addicted hero (because that's what Alasdair's "miasma" is) being too hard for a reader to fall in love with.

Too risky?

Now, reading, particularly romance, is escapism, and addiction isn't very sexy. And perhaps I haven't done a good enough job convincing the reader that Alasdair has changed. I am not blaming the responses all on external forces, and not my own writing.

But I wonder if my own mindset--coming from a long line of addicted, sometimes mentally disturbed folks--has made me accept what most people would find too jarring. I like tortured heroes. I like pulling someone up from the bottom (which is where Alasdair is at the beginning of the book) to a place where he can be happy.

Am I too risky?

A lot has been made of certain risks in books--sympathetic homosexual secondary characters, men and women in unsavory situations, adultery, etc.--and I guess I have to throw my book into that pot.

So my questions to you are--what risks will you absolutely not stand for? Would you sympathize with someone like my Alasdair, or find him repugnant? Which authors are your favorite risk-takers?

Megan

In Praise of Bananas


Today is the anniversary of the day in 1633 when bananas first went on sale to an amazed London public.

It's a little-known fact that the Regency was a great banana-eating epoch, from the famed insipid banana cream pies at Almack's to the overpriced bananas served at Vauxhall, sliced so thinly they were almost transparent. Delicate and expensive to import, bananas were a sure sign of conspicuous consumption.

As an art motif, they lost out to the gorgeously symmetrical and elegant pineapple, and although Byron mentions in several of his letters his epic work on bananas, the manuscript has sadly been lost to posterity. Wedgwood's banana line of tableware was quickly discontinued after derogatory comments.

Gentlemen at White's would frequently lay a banana peel on the pavement outside the famous bow window and make bets on how long it would take for someone to slip.

Beau Brummell introduced the famous banana pantaloons which were immediately banned by most hostesses for drawing room wear.

Sadly for the English, they were not blessed with such fauna as the banana slug or banana spider.


For more information on bananas, try this online museum, bananamuseum.com or join the forums at bananas.org.

Share your favorite banana story or recipe. I'm very partial to banana pancakes and fried bananas, which incorporate a lot of brown sugar and butter.

How about you?

Messages

After blogging last week about caregiver heroines, I realized that whether they work for me or not really boils down to the message coming through the book.

"Do the right thing and happiness will result" is one I can get behind. In real life, sometimes bad things happen to good people but it's still an idea to live by. But sometimes it comes through "Neglect yourself and someone will rescue you"--a bit dodgier as a principle.

But really, when I'm deep in a good book, I'm not thinking about messages at all, I'm just annoyed if I'm interrupted and then I wonder why those demanding children want dinner again, after all I fed them yesterday... :)

When I'm writing my own stories, I try to ignore any messages that come through because I don't want them to seem forced. While I wouldn't go so far as to agree with Mark Twain that "persons attempting to find a moral in it will be banished", I hope no one notices any at least until she's finished the book.

Maybe messages come out wrong when the reader is too obviously smacked over the head with them. But romance as a genre gets dissed for unrealistic messages. Naysayers interpret "Love has healing powers" as "If you love him enough, an abusive man will change". I don't know which (if any) specific books cause them to make that leap.

Do you think about messages when you read/write? If messages get twisted, do you think it's through clumsy writing or perhaps readers' prejudices?

Which messages in romance novels resonate most for you? Least?

Elena
www.elenagreene.com

JANE AUSTEN MOVIE CLUB: Sense & Sensibility (2008), pt. 2

Welcome back to Risky Regencies' JANE AUSTEN MOVIE CLUB!

Today we're discussing the new SENSE & SENSIBILITY, particularly its second half.

If you'd like to look at last week's discussion, or the cast list for this adaptation, just click here.

So: what did you think???

All comments welcome!

Cara
Cara King, author of MY LADY GAMESTER, in which no one chops logs and men rarely take off their coats






Congrats to flchen1!


Congratulations, flchen1!

You have won an autographed copy of Bewitching Season by Marissa Doyle.

Please email riskies@yahoo.com to claim your prize.

Friends Like Us

You all know I'm a Gerard Butler fan. On Saturday, my friend Patty and I attended the Gerard Butler Charity Convention held in Alexandria, Virginia. For two days Gerry's fans gathered together, first to view his new movie, Nim's Island, which opened on Friday; on Saturday to view the award-winning documentary, Wrath of Gods (the director attended the convention), about the making of the movie Beowulf & Grendel, learn Scottish dancing and Scottish customs, learn about making videos, signatures and avatars. Patty and I missed all that, but we did attend the main event, the banquet dinner and raffle. (To see why Patty and I would do such a silly thing like attend a Gerard Butler convention go here and scroll down to Better Late Than Never or the Joys of a Dark Hero)

The raffle was HUGE. The photo shows part of the listings, but there were 8 pages of items and baskets. Lots of movie related items were signed by Gerry especially for the convention, including a huge Phantom of the Opera poster signed by all the cast. The baskets each represented one of his movies. There were books upon which his movies were based, signed by the authors. All the items were donated and all the proceeds will go to Kids Kicking Cancer. Next week I'll tell you how much money they raised. It's going to be in the thousands, wait and see.

I put all my raffle tickets in the "300 Lunch Box" bag and won two of them! (I gave one to Patty) Shown here is the lunch box and some of the other things from the conference.


Here is a cel from 300 that was in the lunch box. It shows the Oracle girl. There was also a 300 tote bag and some magnets.

At the banquet we were shown fan videos, incredible works on the theme of the Timeline of Gerry's career. There was a video compilation of Gerry with his fans from all over the world. (All these videos were done by fans) There was an award-winning celtic fiddler to entertain and a DJ and dancing rivaling anything you'd see at Romantic Times or Harlequin's RWA parties.

What has any of this frivolity to do with us here at Risky Regencies?

The GB fans are a community, like we are here. They are tied together by admiration and affection for an actor, but, then, we are tied by our love of the Regency, of books, of writing. They share their troubles and triumphs like we do.

The ladies who shared our table have been friends for years. One of them battled cancer and, against the odds, beat it. The friends decided then to seize life and enjoy it together. Attending this convention--and the one in Colorado--and the one in Scotland--gave them a reason to get together. Their connection is strong and how they express it--by attending Gerard Butler conventions--is almost irrelevant.

The connections among all 272 convention attendees was a beautiful thing to see.
And our connections here at Risky Regencies are just as beautiful.

Okay....fess up. Who here is a Gerry fan? Lois, of course!! Who else?
Who has seen Nim's Island and what did you think of it?

(PS I love all of you!)

The Riskies Welcome Marissa Doyle!

The Riskies are proud to welcome author Marissa Doyle! Her debut YA historical novel, Bewitching Season, is available now from Henry Holt. You can visit her at her website, or at her own blog Nineteenteen. Or here! Comment for the chance to win a copy...

Riskies: Welcome to Risky Regencies, Marissa! Tell us about Bewitching Season.

Marissa: Well, it's a Young Adult book...but I hope it will have appeal for older readers as well, since there's a little of everything in it! History (the plot is based on historical events and people), fantasy, mystery, and of course romance. It's the story of a pair of twin sisters entering Society in 1837, and how they become embroiled in and eventually foil a plot against the soon-to-be Queen Victoria...with magic.

Riskies: Ooooh, Queen Victoria and magic! What gave you the idea for this story?

Marissa: Bewitching Season came from a happy and fortuitous confluence of two events--a group writing prompt in my local RWA chapter happening at the same time I was reading a biography of Queen Victoria. They just wrapped around each other and clicked! The opening line of the book, in fact, is straight from that writing prompt.

Riskies: What was the research like for this story? Was there any new or surprising historical information you discovered?

Marissa: Research is always the fun part because it gives me an excuse to get onto used book sites and buy fascinating but out-of-print sources--yum! I didn't run across anything very surprising, but that was all right; my goal was to deliver a strong flavor of what it was like to be a teen in the 1830s. Not just the clothes and parties and the details of everyday life (which are so seductive in themselves, and which I wanted to depict as well as I could), but the whole mindset. That you didn't just go off to do what you wanted as you entered adulthood, that parents/family and society expectations generally trumped individual hopes and longings. I wanted teens to understand this book wasn't just people in funny dresses, but a completely different world from what they know here and now.

Riskies: How was the young Queen Victoria different from the dour old lady so many people imagine? (Speaking of young people in the time, LOL)

Marissa: Very!! I blogged about this recently...she was such a typical teen in so many ways. She was very much a product of her genes. Remember all her disreputable uncles (and aunts) and her 56 illegitimate cousins? She loved to party and dance all night, and go to the theater, and generally have fun. But once she marred Albert, much of that changed. He liked to go to bed at 9, and parties and balls made him feel ill. And she got pregnant on their honeymoon, so she went from party girl to woman with aching back and morning sickness rather abruptly. She practically worshiped him and accepted his word as unvarnished law, so once he condemned her partying as frivolous she gave it up. I sometimes can't help wondering what would have happened if she'd married someone a little less rigid and humorless!

But even in old age she could be charming. Many of her grandchildren were devoted to her, and loved just hanging out with her and telling her jokes so they could hear her laugh, which was supposedly delightfully girlish and giggly even in her 80s.

Riskies: What are some of the challenges in writing for the YA market?

Marissa: What has struck me about writing YA isn't the challenge, but the freedom. There really are no rules in YA beyond those of good, compelling, honest storytelling and writing. I happen to like HEAs with the adorable and adoring hero, but if my story and heroine had chosen another path that would have been perfectly acceptable in YA. And I love being able to focus on my heroine's growth as a person as much as on other elements.

Riskies: What else is "risky" about this book?

Marissa: Hmmm...probably the mix of history and fantasy! I've done my best to make the historical figures as accurate and true to the historical record as possible, and the underlying premise of the story--Victoria's long struggle with her mother's comptroller Sir John Conroy--is all true. I just took it a step further by asking "what would happen if Sir John tried to gain control from Victoria by use of magic?" It seems to have worked, as reviews from places like Kirkus and Booklist have all mentioned that despite the magical elements, the books manages to remain firmly in the historical world. That makes me very happy!!!

Riskies: What do you think of the Young Victoria movie coming out later this year??

Marissa: I soooo can't wait for it to be released! Victoria's youth was so dramatic in many ways, and she herself is such a strong character. I'm only surprised no one has done this already! And from what I've seen, the costumes look spot-on, which for some reason is reassuring about the rest of the historical correctness of this film. As I said, she had such an interesting young womanhood that too much Hollywood embellishment will (I hope!) be unneccesary.

Riskies: I know you and Regina Scott have a blog, too! How is it going so far?

Marissa: It's wonderful! I've been contemplating blogging for a while, but didn't want to do another navel-gazing, day-in-the-life-of-the-writer blog. Then Regina and I did a workshop together on writing historical YAs at the Beau Monde Conference in Dallas, and it hit me--we both were writing these historical YAs, so how about a blog on teens in the 19th century? And how about the 2 of us doing it together? And so, Nineteenteen was born!

I love having Regina to discuss blog post ideas with, among other things. We're also part of the Class of 2k8, a promotional group of 27 debut YA and middle-grade (10-13) authors, so our work often ties into the blog.

Riskies: And what's next for you?

Marissa: More YA! The sequel to Bewitching Season, which is still unnamed and which tells the story of the other Leland twin when she goes to study magic in Ireland, is out next spring from Holt! And after that? I hope to have more news soon...

The Writing Life


I recently read a book called A Broom of One's Own: Words on Writing, Housecleaning, and Life by Nancy Peacock. Though I've never read one of her novels, on the strength and entertainment value of these essays I'm going to buy one immediately!

Peacock talks about both the life of the writer, the artist, and her old 'day job' of housecleaning, what she learned from the work and the people whose houses she cleaned. (I must say, the chapter on the Hamiltons made me feel much better about my own lackluster housekeeping! At least I always put my candy wrappers and used Kleenex in the trashcan). She says several things I could identify with in my own weird odyssey of writing books.

From page 20, on writing full-time for a year: "...I did miss having something in my life besides writing. Writing itself had not become a strong enough foundation yet, and without the foundations of regular work I felt like an emotional mudslide. I was caving in on myself. Living alone, probing a fictional world for six hours a day, was making me feel a little weird...I was discovering, in fact, that writing full-time was inefficient. I found that I could write effectively for two or three hours each day. After that, time spent at the desk was time spent mucking up my characters' story. I'd lost the ability to listen to them."

From Amanda--I've never cleaned houses for a living (see above, those lackluster cleaning skills--no one would pay me to do that!), but I do work a "day job", working in a library/archives and doing an occasional newspaper story. I relish holidays, when I have long stretches of time where I can stay home and really get ahead on a book, but I'm never too sorry to go back to work, either. I dream about being a full-time author, but the truth is I need the structure of the day job. It makes my writing time more precious, more efficient. I have to get right to the point of the story every day when I sit down with my pen. And it keeps me from watching soap operas and sitting around in Hello Kitty pajamas all day!

From page 53, on publishing one's work: "I think that in the beginning of my writing life I believed that writing, publication in particular, could, besides making me rich, also make me invulnerable. It might have been the stupidest thought I ever had, because there is nothing, with the exception of love, that has ever made me feel more vulnerable than writing and publishing."

From Amanda--amen to that! I think that writing (the world of romance publishing especially, perhaps) sets up a sort of "magic door" way of thinking. Once we sell our work, all will be wonderful! I may have thought that once. But publishing just opens up a whole new world of concerns and, yes, vulnerabilities. I'm not magically more self-confident because my book now has a cover and sits on a bookstore shelf; in fact, I am less. Ack! It's making me nervous just thinking about it all!!!

From page 72--73: "Writing is so crazy. There must be a million things to do that are saner than writing...It feels a little like living a double life. It feels secretive. If one of my characters suddenly dies, and I am moved to grief, or even tears, I can't share that with anyone.

"I think this is why I thrive on routine. I like for the real life, the one that involves going to work and cooking dinner and being in the physical world, to be somewhat predictable, because there are enough surprises in the alternate life."

From Amanda--okay, so this is why I have a much harder time writing when my routine is messed up! (When it's Christmas, for instance, or there's an illness in my family, or I'm helping my brother's fiancee get ready for their wedding in May). My alternate world keeps getting interrupted. And it is an alternate world. I may appear to be grocery shopping or cooking a pot of pasta, but in reality I'm trying to figure out how to unravel my latest plotting problem, or trying out bits of dialogue aloud...

And on page 23: "I think there are two things writers love more than anything else. One is solitude and the other is gossip. In the housecleaning trade I got both, but in all the jobs I worked before housecleaning there was too much gossip and not enough solitude. These jobs exhausted me."

From Amanda--LOL! My last job involved a great deal of inter-personal conflict (not with me--between other co-workers, but they always wanted to tell me all about it). This current job suits me very well. Most of the work is on my own, but sometimes people in the offices next door come by and chat, and I eat lunch with them. This gives me time to think, to let my stories percolate in my mind, but keeps me from going bat-crazy. And there is always something interesting going on here! I like to take breaks a couple times a day to check in with the Riskies and other blogs.

What about all of you? Do you have a "day job"? How does it help/hinder your writing? What is your perfect balance of solitude and gossip?

And don't forget! On April 6, I will be blogging at Unusual Historicals, with a chance to win a copy of A Sinful Alliance! It's on shelves now, and my mother says it is very good. :)

Misery Loves . . . To Post


I moved last week.
And now I am sneezing my head off (it's raining, it's dusty, and my nose loves to torment me. Go figure).
I haven't read a book--nor even started one--in over a week.

I did find my tea, though, so life isn't all bleak. And even though there are boxes and garbage bags and everything, I can smile (occasionally) because I spy my bookcase filled with books yet to be read--delicious treats I haven't tasted yet.

What book should I plunge into once I have time? What else would you suggest for when I finally get to relax? What do you do when you are sneezing, stressed and it's raining like a moose outside?

And won't you all be glad when I can write again, and not post about the mundanity of my life?

Megan

Is it too easy?

If you want to see all of this picture, go on over to the Wet Noodle Posse blog where today I'm blogging about conflict. (And if you've ever wondered, when you google for Darcy wet shirt you will come up with about 102,000 hits and 16, 700 under google images.)


So is it too easy?


We have so much information at our fingertips and the actual process of writing itself is so easy--cut n paste, cut, copy, and so on--that I wonder if we've lost something in the process. Consider Jane Austen who had limited amounts of time (well, that hasn't changed much), and wrote in a room that was shared by family members. Paper was expensive. It was important to get things right the first time--or almost right. How many of us would have started writing without a computer? (To answer my own question: I'm not really sure.)

I think the challenges we have now (along with the same old same old of lack of time, family obligations, and having to make a living as well--or relying on someone else to do so) are more insidious. Do we suffer from a surfeit of riches--too many resources, too much advice, and do you think it's harmful?

It seems ironic that writing, an essentially solo operation, now has become a community, if not team, activity. It's much easier to talk about writing than do, too easy to go online to see what others are saying and thinking. Some is useful. A lot, in my opinion, is damaging.

For one thing, it stops you from writing, from actually doing the work. And I'm one of the worst offenders, ever. The temptation to just hop over to see what's happening at a blog (this one, say) and then you follow a few links and before you know it hours have sped by... The other point is that not all information is equal, particularly online where opinion and information seem to overlap; where the trivial and the significant get mixed into one big internet stew.

And the worst thing of all--if you take too seriously what others are doing or saying, you can lose faith in your own work. Actually, two worst things of all. Take all the advice, or try to, and you'll end up with something lifeless that just isn't good enough.

So what do you do to protect yourself and spend your time wisely? What are your favorite places online that you feel are useful and reliable? And do you feel the need to limit your time online, and if so, how do you do it?

Heroines in Mom Jeans

I love makeover shows. I’d like nothing better than to wake up some morning and be ambushed by Stacy and Clinton to go off on a $5000 shopping spree in NYC. At this point, I’m probably not enough of a fashion disaster to make the cut. But there was a time when my children were small, sleep was scarce and my beauty regimen consisted of showering. When I watch these shows I can definitely relate to some of the moms in their baggy sweatpants and bad 80s jeans!

But once in a while, when friends of the fashion victim say she deserves the makeover because “she does everything for others and never thinks of herself” it almost seems like a reward for martyrdom. It almost makes me want to go back into those Mom Jeans and see if someone will nominate me! :)

Which makes me think about the Caregiver Heroine. In Regencies, this is often the lady whose father gambled away the family fortune. Now she’s taking care of the estate and a bunch of younger siblings. Maybe she’s selling herself into marriage with a wealthy rake (or even submitting to a Fate Worse Than Death). Or she’s scrimping and saving so a younger sister can have her London Season. Georgette Heyer’s FREDERICA is a classic example.

With caregiver heroines the hero can provide that whole take-me-away-from-it-all fantasy which can be fun. On the other hand, the caregiver heroine can be a cliché, a shortcut to characterization. I’m glad to see that more recent releases feature heroines who are striking out for themselves in some way.

A caregiver heroine can still work for me, though. It’s part setup and part attitude. I want to know she really doesn’t have better alternatives and isn’t just enabling poor Papa’s gambling problem. At least let her be angry with him about it! I want to know she’s not putting her own needs on a backburner just because she doesn’t value herself. FREDERICA works because the heroine is a happy person. She enjoys the shopping and parties involved in giving her sister a Season; I’m sure she’ll have even more fun once her burdens are lightened.

So what do you think? Do you enjoy reading about caregiver heroines? Do you have any favorites? Where is the boundary between a heroine who is bravely dealing with a difficult situation and one who is just making a martyr of herself?

Elena

JANE AUSTEN MOVIE CLUB: Sense and Sensibility (2008)

Welcome to the Risky Regencies JANE AUSTEN MOVIE CLUB!

Today we're discussing the new BBC adaptation of SENSE AND SENSIBILITY.

Or, at least, we're discussing the first half of it. We'll discuss the second half next Tuesday!

So...what did you think of the casting, costumes, carriages, country-dances, or anything else?

To aid the discussion, here are the major credits:


Screenplay: Andrew Davies

Director: John Alexander



CAST:

Marianne Dashwood: Charity Wakefield

Elinor Dashwood: Hattie Morahan

Margaret Dashwood: Lucy Boynton

John Dashwood: Mark Gatiss

Fanny Dashwood: Claire Skinner

Mrs. Dashwood: Janet McTeer

Colonel Brandon: David Morrissey

Edward Ferrars: Dan Stevens

The non-horrific-looking Dan Stevens has recently appeared in television adaptations of both FRANKENSTEIN and DRACULA.

Robert Ferrars: Leo Bill

Lady Middleton: Rosanna Lavelle

Mrs. Jennings: Linda Bassett

Sir John Middleton: Mark Williams

Are you wondering why Mark Williams looks familiar? He plays Arthur Weasley in the HARRY POTTER movies. He was also seen in the recent TRISTRAM SHANDY (a.k.a. A COCK AND BULL STORY.)

Charlotte Palmer: Tabitha Wady

Miss Steele: Daisy Haggard

Lucy Steele: Anna Madeley

Mr. Palmer: Tim McMullan

Willoughby: Dominic Cooper

Fans of BECOMING JANE'S James McAvoy may have seen Dominic Cooper in STARTER FOR TEN; Cooper also gained notice in HISTORY BOYS. Later this year he will appear alongside Keira Knightley in THE DUCHESS.

Eliza: Caroline Hayes

Mrs. Ferrars: Jean Marsh



So...please let us know what you thought of it!

All opinions welcome!

(And if you're interested in finding out which Austen adaptations we've already discussed, and adding your point of view, just click on the "Jane Austen Movie Club" link below!)

Cara
Cara King, who has more sense than sensibility...and more hair than wit...
 
2005-2008 © Risky Regencies
Designed by Enchanted Web Style