Congrats to Elizabeth and Gillian!

Congratulations to Elizabeth Kerri Mahon! You've won the autographed copy of A SINFUL ALLIANCE by Amanda McCabe.

Also, since we have not heard from Sue, we've picked Gillian Layne as the winner of a signed ARC of APHRODITE'S BREW by Delle Jacobs. Congratulations, Gillian!

Please email the Riskies at riskies@yahoo.com to claim your prizes.

A Day of Pain

Last week I mentioned that I was going to Hillwood House, the home of the late Marjorie Merriweather Post. Post designed the house to be a living museum and it is beautiful. She was a collector of decorative arts, especially from 18th century France and pre-Communist Russia, like the Fabergé egg shown here (not from her collection).

There were some Regency era paintings. One I correctly guessed as a Thomas Lawrence (I was so proud of myself). Another one I asked about, but our tour guide was obviously a Russian scholar and nothing else quite registered with her. So she didn't know...
The Lawrence, was the Portrait of Mrs. Michel nee Anne Fane.

It was a lovely day spent with writing friends!

Today won't be so much fun.

First is my trip to the accountant for the taxes. I used to do our taxes myself, but as they got more complex, I'd have an anxiety attack every time. It is so much better to hand them to the accountant. She likes reading Romance, so I always bring her a book.

It got me thinking about taxes during the Regency, when there were taxes on everything. From What Jane Austen Ate and Charles Dickens Knew (which, by the way, is on sale for $5.99 on Amazon), there were taxes on "land, income, the practice of law, newspaper advertisements, glass, candles, beer,malt, carriages, menservants, coats of arms, newspapers, paper, bricks, stone, coal, windows, corn, soap, horses, dogs, salt, sugar, raisins, tea, coffee, tobacco, playing cards, timber, silk, and...headgear."

I don't feel so bad now.....

Except, I have to go to the dentist afterward. My dentist is a great guy and an enthusiastic supporter of my writing (he once phoned me on a Sunday to tell me about a History Channel show about dueling, which he knew I was researching). He's a bit advanced from the Regency dentist, though. This is from the Jane Austen Society of Australia, about Jane's visit to the dentist with three of her nieces:

‘The poor girls & their teeth!’ a Visit to the Dentist by Joanna Penglase
"Mr Spence remonstrates strongly over Lizzy’s teeth, cleaning and filing them and filling the ‘very sad hole’ between two of the front ones. But it is Marianne who suffers most: she is obliged to have two teeth extracted to make room for others to grow. ‘When her doom was fixed’ says Jane Austen, ‘Fanny Lizzy and I walked into the next room, where we heard each of the two sharp hasty Screams’. Fanny came off lightest, but even her ‘pretty teeth’ Mr Spence found fault with, ‘putting in gold and talking gravely’, moving Jane Austen to grave doubts about his motives. ‘He must be a Lover of Teeth & Money & Mischief to parade about Fanny’s’, she declares."

It is some comfort that my dentist is not Mr. Spence!

I hope you have more wonderful things to do today! Things without pain. Tell me about them!

(I am watching Sense and Sensibility at this moment....Edward Ferrars......((((THUD))))

Oh, this is the last day for my contest. Enter before midnight!

Oh Oh, I almost forgot to invite you to the Wet Noodle Posse blog. We're doing a whole year on writing and April is Conflict month. We have lots of guest bloggers in April, including Jo Beverley! And we're giving away a signed copy of one of her books to one lucky commenter.

Amanda's New Interview!

"The perilous action and the elegance of the writing...allowed me to thoroughly enjoy an unusual and fascinating story of an intriguing era" --Romance Reviews Today

Amanda (standing in as RR): Why, hello, Amanda! Such a surprise to see you here, at your own computer and all. Tell us about A Sinful Alliance! How does this fit into the "Renaissance Trilogy"?

Amanda (as herself): I'm so glad you asked! I am soooo excited about this book. The hero Nicolai (who was a KISS--Knight in Shining Silver--in the April RT, so yay him! I think he's the first of my characters to win their very own award) was the hero's friend in A Notorious Woman. As so often happens with these pesky secondary characters, I hadn't actually intended to write a whole book for him (though he was a hottie). But I really fell for him, and I found a very beautiful, but troubled and lonely, heroine, who really needed his kind of magic--Marguerite Dumas, a French spy.

Trouble was, she once tried to kill him. Bit of a rocky start there. They meet up a few months after this little incident at the court of Henry VIII at Greenwich, still on opposite sides of ever-shifting political alliances. This event was a real historical happening, a meeting in early 1527 between King Henry and a French delegation seeking a marriage between young Princess Mary and King Francois's younger son. This weeks-long meeting was filled with lavish banquets, balls, jousts, and masques, with specially built theaters and banquet halls. England's old alliance with Spain is faltering, thanks to Henry's new infatuation with Anne Boleyn and Katherine of Aragon's loss of influence, so it made the perfect setting for an illicit, dangerous affair. And also some really great clothes! (Stay tuned next week for more research info on this stuff)

And it's the second of the trilogy. The third (which I'm just finishing!) is about Balthazar Grattiano, who is now a ship's captain in the Caribbean!

A as RR: Did you run across anything new or interesting while researching this story?

A as A: Tons! Besides the actual events of this English/French meeting (the Spanish were there, too--never count out the Spanish!), I researched Tudor clothes, tennis, jousts, hunting, Greenwich Palace (plus Fontainebleau Palace, for one scene), sword fighting, theater, fashion. It was way too much fun!

A as RR: Have you always been interested in this time period?

A as A: When I was a kid, I loved watching old movies with my grandmother. One afternoon we watched a Tudor marathon--Anne of the Thousand Days and A Man For All Seasons. I loved them, and immediately started reading all I could about the Tudors! Anne Boleyn particularly intrigued me. The juxtaposition of such splendor and luxury with such terrible danger and intrigue really interests me, and hopefully I brought all that into A Sinful Alliance.

(And hopefully, judging from the popularity of The Other Boleyn Girl and Showtime's weird The Tudors, other people are intrigued, too!)

A as RR: What was the biggest challenge of this story?

A as A: The challenge was also the part I enjoyed the most--the history! There was so much going on in this short space of time, and I didn't want to let it overwhelm the characters and their romance. Luckily for me, Nicolai and Marguerite were strong characters, and they basically ran with their own story. I had a clear picture of them in my head (they looked a lot like Heath Ledger and Abbie Cornish, though not so modern as in this pic, of course!), and they had such complex pasts and personalities that made them perfect for each other. I just created the historical backdrop, and let them go! :)

A as RR: Okay, we always have to ask--what's 'risky" about A Sinful Alliance???

A as A: Well, the setting is pretty risky! You don't find 1527 England on the shelf everyday, but I hope there is interest in it. It's a fantastic time period. And the fact that the hero is Russian, and the heroine is a French spy. But so far Harlequin hasn't told me "you can't do that" on anything, so yay!

A as RR: What's next for you?

A as A: I'm just finishing up Balthazar's story now! Then it's on to the third (and last) of my Regency-set The Muses of Mayfair trilogy (watch for them next year!). Then an Elizabethan story inspired by Dancing With the Stars (which just proves inspiration can strike anywhere!). And in 2010, the first of my "Daughters of Ireland" series with Grand Central Publishing! Now, I have to go get to work...

BTW, if you don't win the autographed copy of A Sinful Alliance here, I will be visiting a few other blogs! On April 2, I'll be at the Romance Vagabonds; April 4 at the Romance Bandits; and on April 6 at Unusual Historicals. Please drop by and leave comments, so I won't feel too lonely! And visit my website to read an excerpt...

Drink Up!



from Medical News Today:

Women who drink three cups of tea a day "are less likely to have heart attacks and strokes," the Daily Express reports. The newspaper adds, however, that "strangely, no added benefit of tea drinking was found among women who only had one or two cups a day or for men".

The article goes on to say that this study doesn't conclusively prove that tea aids womens' hearts, but heck, I am a selective news-taker, so I am going to drink my tea and feel smug that I'm doing something for my heart.



I drink a lot of tea. My heart must be AWESOME!

Can you tell I am moving tomorrow, and all I can think about is relaxing? With a cup of tea? And maybe a handsome guy (btw, my husband is quite handsome. As is my son).

Learning London again

I've decided to go to London this spring for a few days. The major purpose of my trip is to visit the Old Man my Father (who is not a tree) but for the first time in my life I'm going to stay for a few days in London and play tourist. And it seems weird, but I feel I don't know the city at all, despite having lived there for a few years (a long time ago); the last time I was there was ten years ago.

Stuff changes. I think the only city in England, other than my home town, that I feel I still know, is Bath--i.e., I don't get lost immediately after leaving the train station. But London is always changing and reinventing itself.

So, on the list so far:

Burlington Arcade. Super posh, the world's first indoor shopping mall and almost 200 years old, and still with a policy of keeping out the riff raff (it was built by Lord Cavendish who lived next door and was tired of people throwing oyster shells into his garden). Not that I'm going to buy anything there; but looking is free.

The Sir John Soane's Museum, which I've heard is amazing and full of Regency goodness.

And from there, a quick jump over the river to The Globe. Will I get to a performance? Maybe. The friend I intend to meet up with in London is a real theater fan.

While on that side of the river, there are a few other places I'd like to go to, including the house in Deptford where Marlowe was murdered--apparently it's still standing though I haven't been able to find anything out about its location.

And further east, but on that side of the river, Greenwich--old pubs, the National Maritime Museum (full of Nelson goodness as I remember), the Cutty Sark, and the view over the river to Hampstead on a clear day; and also whatever spiffy new developments are on the other side of the Thames now. If I can, I intend to get there by river, going past St. Pauls and the Tower and all that good stuff.

So if you were in London for two or three days, what would your agenda be? (Noting how unfavorable the exchange rate is to the dollar). And do you like to plan or just do things on the spur of the moment?

The Spanish Bride

I'm continuing to immerse myself in research for my hero's military background. I didn't want to break from it even during my Easter travel, so I brought along THE SPANISH BRIDE by Georgette Heyer. It's the fictionalized account of Brigade Major Harry Smith and his bride, Juana, whom he married after the siege of Badajoz, and their succeeding adventures from the Peninsular War through Waterloo.

A review on the inside cover from The Sunday Times states "Altogether, it is an exceedingly able reconstruction of historic events, in which the love story, though delightful enough, takes second place."

This was probably a necessary warning to fans of Heyer's Regencies that this book is not one of them. Personally I think the review is spot-on; I found the descriptions of military life far more interesting than Harry and Juana's romance. There was plenty of story conflict in terms of the war but not much romantic conflict. Apparently it was love at first sight, and neither cared much for culture differences. Harry spoke fluent Spanish; Juana adjusted readily to the army life. The story is peppered by minor marital spats followed by passionate reconciliations, all of which would have been merely annoying had they not been brief. In fact, a few times I felt Juana was behaving like a melodramatic teenager before I remembered that she was indeed only fourteen when they married and just seventeen by the time of Waterloo.

Anyway, even though the circumstances were more exciting than usual, Harry and Juana's story isn't the stuff of a romance novel. That cover quote made me think about what people think of as a love story. Some diss romance for being unrealistic. I've always thought it was because they don't believe in happy endings. But maybe it's the other way around. I know many happily married couples whose stories (met at a party, dated, fell in love and decided to marry) are just not that interesting to anyone but those close to them.

Maybe some people think a romance novel is all one long romp in a flowery meadow and there's no conflict worth following. Maybe they don't realize that romance authors try to give their characters deeper problems to solve than most real life couples face. And these problems are not only external, such as the hazards of war Harry and Juana Smith faced, but something that challenges the relationship. Admittedly, some authors fall short, relying on misunderstandings or cardboard villains to keep things going. It's probably one of the toughest challenges in writing a romance: to come up with two people who are perfect for one another and a powerful and believable problem that their love will have to overcome.

What sorts of conflicts do or don't work for you? If you have read THE SPANISH BRIDE, what did you think?

Elena
www.elenagreene.com

JANE AUSTEN MOVIE CLUB: Emma (1996/TV)

Welcome to the Risky Regencies JANE AUSTEN MOVIE CLUB!

Here we dish, dissect, debate, deride, and drool over various dramatic adaptations of Jane Austen's works.

Today: the ITV/A&E version of EMMA from 1996. (You may have noticed there were actually two Emmas in 1996 -- this is the Kate Beckinsale version.)

To aid the discussion, here are the major credits (with trivia in green):

DIRECTOR: Diarmuid Lawrence

Lawrence directed the 1987 BBC miniseries of VANITY FAIR.

SCREENPLAY: Andrew Davies

The much-celebrated Davies wrote the screenplays for the 2008 SENSE AND SENSIBILITY, the 2007 NORTHANGER ABBEY, the 1998 miniseries of VANITY FAIR, and (most famously) the 1995 PRIDE AND PREJUDICE.

CAST:

Kate Beckinsale -- Emma Woodhouse

Mark Strong -- Mr. Knightley

Bernard Hepton -- Mr. Woodhouse

Hepton played Sir Thomas Bertram in the 1983 miniseries of MANSFIELD PARK.

Samantha Bond -- Mrs. Weston

Bond is another veteran of the 1983 MANSFIELD PARK; she played Maria.

James Hazeldine -- Mr. Weston

Samantha Morton -- Harriet Smith

Morton played Sara Coleridge in the movie Pandaemonium (2000); Sophie in the 1997 television miniseries of TOM JONES; and Jane in the 1997 JANE EYRE.

Olivia Williams -- Jane Fairfax

Williams recently played Jane Austen in the television movie MISS AUSTEN REGRETS.

Prunella Scales -- Miss Bates

Here's one I haven't seen, but wish I could! Prunella Scales played Lydia in the 1952 BBC miniseries of PRIDE AND PREJUDICE. (Has anyone ever seen this version? It starred Peter Cushing as Darcy!)

Sylvia Barter -- Mrs. Bates

Raymond Coulthard -- Frank Churchill

Dominic Rowan -- Mr. Elton

Lucy Robinson -- Mrs. Elton

Robinson appeared in another Davies-scripted Austen: she was Mrs. Hurst in the 1995 miniseries of PRIDE AND PREJUDICE.

Guy Henry -- John Knightley

Dido Miles -- Isabella Knightley

Peter Howell -- Mr. Perry

Judith Coke -- Mrs. Goddard

Alistair Petrie -- Robert Martin


So....what did you think??? How did the script work for you? The casting? Or anything else?

All opinions welcome!

And join us next Tuesday, when we discuss the new adaptation of SENSE AND SENSIBILITY!

Cara
Cara King, who rarely scolds puppies, and never talks about her caro sposo in public

Diane Update

So many people wake up in the morning wondering, "What is Diane up to?" I thought I would do a Diane Update.

Writing Life: This has been a good month for Riskies, writing-wise. I'm very happy to announce that Harlequin/Mills & Boon have given me another book contract, 4 books and 1 novella (the one with Amanda and Deb Marlowe). (Yippee!) I'm leaving the world of people that began with The Mysterious Miss M and writing what I call my Three Soldiers Trilogy, still in the Regency. Three soldiers experience the same traumatic event in Spain that affects the rest of their lives.

Health and Beauty: I am still trying to lose the weight I've put on since 2003 (I won't say how much but I don't weigh as much as that scale shows!) My latest attempt is with the South Beach Diet. I'm not following the meal plans, because I am so-not-a-cook, but I am following the food guidelines. Basically South Beach means giving up bread, pasta, potatoes and candy (Sniff!) but it has been surpisingly easy---for the first week. As Keira knows, I also go to Curves. My goal is to go at least three times a week. Burning question--Can I lose the weight by the RWA Conference this summer?

I also caved in to the Leeza Gibbons infomercial for Sheer Cover Make-up. I like it! But I also like Bare Minerals, which I first purchased from an infomercial a few years ago. Here's a nice discussion of both.

Entertainment: Amanda's convinced me I should see Miss Pettigrew Lives for a Day. Not hard to do, because I recently saw Enchanted and have become an Amy Adams fan. I LOVED Enchanted! How nice to see a happy movie for a change. Enchanted, by the way, is on sale at Target this week at $14.99! (I have also watched the Kate Beckinsale Emma on Masterpiece and can't wait for Cara to discuss it!)

Wednesday I am going to see Merriweather Post's Hillwood House here in Washington, DC. Marjorie Merriweather Post was a great collector of 18th and 19th century European and Russian art. The house features a room with an Adams ceiling, if I am remembering correctly.

That's it! Breathe a collective sigh of relief that you are now up-to-date on Diane, something I also attempt on my website. By the way this is the last week for my website contest, with a Kathryn Caskie book as one of the prizes.

So....what is your news in Writing, Health and Beauty, and Entertainment? I wake up every morning wondering....

Meet Delle Jacobs

Welcome to the Riskies, Delle!

Thanks so much for inviting me to be a Risky For a Day! I love reading your blog, and it's a real pleasure to be a part of it. I'll have a signed ARC of my latest release, Aphrodite's Brew, plus a little chocolate gift (not an Easter Bunny) for one of you at the end of the day. Just be sure to send me your email address so I can arrange shipping with you!

And while I'm promoting, let me drop a few lines about the Royal Ascot, which I'm coordinating this year. There's lots of new information, so be sure to check it out on the Beau Monde website. It's a fabulous contest, a great place to try out your Regencies, with terrific prizes, wonderful critiques and comments, and wonderful editors for the final round. Save money by entering electronically, or be traditional and send a paper entry. Unusual and cross-genre Regencies are encouraged, and fimalsts whose entries are outside the gsub-genres the final round editors would buy will be provided with an extra read by an editor who acquires that sub-genre. And all non-finalists' names will be put into a drawing for several 50-page critiques for non-finaling entrants.

Enough of the soapbox. Onward to the questions now.

I'll join you briefly on your soapbox before we both jump off to also encourage people to enter. I'm one of the writers who first published as a result of the contest! Now tell us about Aphrodite's Brew.

Aphrodite's Brew is what I call my piece of fluff, although it really isn't all that fluffy. I meant for it to be a Regency Romp, emphasis on the Romp. Comedy bordering on slapstick. Not a book to be taken seriously, just one to be fun. But by the second draft, my characters started to take on more angst, more depth, and the book had a different tone and blend than I had originally planned.

It's just an ordinary restorative tonic for women that Sylvia, Lady Ashbroughton, makes and secretly sells to finance her beloved step-daughter's entrance into society. She has no notion it has an entirely different effect on men. But the bachelors of the Ton are suddenly and eagerly rushing giddly off to Gretna Green and committing the unthinkable atrocity agaist bachelorhood .

Word has it a love potion has fallen into the hands of the match-making mamas. The gay blades are all doomed. Val--Lord Vailmont, a man of science and reason who scoffs at magic, witchcraft and the like, vows to prove to his superstitious friends they are being duped. A wager ensues, and the embittered widower who has vowed never to marry again sets out to hunt down the perpetrator of the hoax. The clues lead his straight to Sylvia, and one look in her silver-green eyes sets his soul spinning as if he has just encountered a witch.

Sylvia needs no handsome earls prying into her life. If Val learns of her secret trade in potions, she will be ruined and her beloved stepdaughter will be deprived of her Season. Worse, the earl could uncover Sylvia’s most shameful secret—her weakness for handsome men like him. So she protects her fragile heart from him by concocting an old family charm to wear in a locket. But neither logic nor charms can combat the stubborn love that sweeps them into a whirl of unbridled passion.

And, from somewhere in the mists of time, a forgotten, nameless god is laughing.

I have a great video for Aphrodite's Brew, full of my own art work. Check it out-- I hope you enjoy it.

How hard was it to incorporate paranormal elements in a novel set in the early industrial/late enlightenment period?

I think it's both easy and hard. Regency readers and writers often show great attention to detail and accuracy, sometimes to the point where we are almost writing non-fiction instead of romance. Paranormal, on the other hand, calls for suspension of disbelief on a large scale. But that's the very premise of Aphrodite's Brew: pitting fact and reason against mysticism, the unreal, ethereal elements no facts or logic can explain. The Regency period is perfect for this because it sits squarely between the ancient world of faith and belief in things ethereal and the modern world of science and rationality. I chose my two characters to represent the duality. Val doesn't believe in much of anything that can't be rationally explained, but Sylvia has roots deep in the past, perhaps, I've hinted, all the way back to the pre-literate ancient Celts. To me, this premise is like England itself, a modern industrial, literate land surrounded and deeply ingrained in its own long history.

What do you love/hate about the Regency?

I don't hate anything about it. The Regency was what it was, flaws and all. I think it's easy to look back on the past and criticize. It would be hard to go back from the present and live in the past, but if we were born there with no knowledge of what the future would bring, we wouldn't think it so bad. Just as in today's world, we'd see things that ought not to be, and perhaps try to change them. And we'd look back at the previous generations and wonder how the could stand their primitive lives. There were things like slavery and lack of rights for women I would not want to live with, and I not be at all keen to go back any time before Pasteur. But if I didn't know what germs were, and if my expectations of life were lower, I doubt I'd be overly worried about the things that are such issues for me today.

You've had a rather tortuous path to publication--what advice do you have for those struggling toward publication?

I noticed you said tortuous, not tortured. I had to go back and look to be sure, because either would fit. Part of my struggle had to do with coming to recognize I have stories to tell that may not be what New York wants to hear or publish. I suspect I always knew that to some degree, but it was difficult for me to accept the choice I really had, to either write the stories that are highly commercially viable, and hope to sell them even if they aren't stories I want to write, or write what speaks to me even if it has a smaller audience. I'm afraid I still haven't completely resolved that one. I'm still looking for the middle ground. To put it another way, I'm still trying to find MY story that is also THEIR story.

I think I would advise authors to know their market, yes, but more than that, to really analyze their own goals for writing. Find out what it is you REALLY want from your writing career. Would you write anything your editor or agent told you to write (assuming you got such a directive) even if it happened to be a subject you hate? What would you do, how far would you go to get published? Or are you like the fellow who used to sit on the other side of my cubicle wall, and refuse to change a single word of your story, even knowing you would pass up publication for your decision? Do you fall in between? Find out by ruthlessly examining yourself where you fit. It's perfectly possible you will be one of those perfect fits in the genre of romance, writing story after story you love, and selling it to editors and readers who love it too. But if not, try to understand where you fit, and if your story doesn't fit THEIR story, how much are your willing to bend? Or conversely, how can you find the stories that are perhaps different enough to blaze a new trail through the forest of fiction?

A risk is a risk is a risk. The question is, are you willing to pay the price?

The Riskies question: do you--or your editor-- consider you took a risk with this book?

To begin with, it was originally written as a traditional Regency with a paranormal plot, mixed heavily with comedy. Sex was added in the second draft because it needed to be there. At the time, this mix was a pretty hard sell. Traditional Regencies didn't have sex for the most part-- wow, has that changed! The tone is strongly Regency. The comedy was almost slapstick in places and definitely pokes fun at the characters. And paranormal wasn't often done. The book has been rejected for all of the above by various editors. One loved it, but didn't want any fantasy elements in her house's stories. One didn't want sex in Regencies. At least one reviewer has actually taken this book seriously, and that really blows my mind. Humor is hard, and never so hard as when the reader doesn't get it. Mostly, though, this book didn't sell to the big houses because it was thought of as a traditional Regency. Three editors attempted to buy it, but in every case it lost out because they saw it as a traditional Regency, at the very moment their Regency lines were coming crashing down. It is a very strange feeling to have several editors all gushing over a book they can't buy.

All that, though, made it a perfect book for Samhain. As a smaller press that publishes both electronically and in print, they can attract just exactly the right audience. Traditional Regency lovers are learning to find the stories they love in e-books. And they've changed enough with the times that a more sensual story is very welcome, as long as it actually makes sense with the times. Paranormal has become so popular, it has become an asset, not a liability. So I guess part of the risk has to do with timing.

What's next for you?

Another risky book. Sins of the Heart, which won the Royal Ascot and several other contests (but was written after I decided I didn't need any more Golden Hearts) is an adventure Regency romance. Its setting is risky-- a small town in Cornwall, not the ballrooms of London. It's as much about spies and smugglers as it is about deceit and betrayal. And maybe it's not as risky as the one that will follow it because I'm straying into the dangerous territory of religion. One of the strongest characters in Sins is a charismatic Cornishman who, like most commoners of Cornwall, is a fervent Methodist who sees no contradiction at all with his frequent dabbling in the Free Trade. I haven't started this book yet, except in my head, and maybe, if I write it, I'll keep it to myself. I'm enamored with the conflict between Davy's rigidly moral, sometimes authoritarian conscience and the Frenchwoman spy he was forced to rescue off the very beaches of France. She is everything he doesn't believe is right, but he can't stop thinking about her.

After that, more risky stuff. Currently I have a series planned around the Laughing God in Aphrodite's Brew. The next is Gilding Lilly, a Cinderella-Ugly Duckling sort of story in which beauty doesn't win out, after all. There are also two minor characters in the first book who you probably wouldn't think worthy of their own romance, and they aren't-- yet. They're beautiful faces on shallow people. In Lilly, they begin to let slip things that show they aren't so shallow, but are caught in a trap the don't understand and can't escape. It will take another book before they grow enough to be the hero and heroine we want to root for, and finally when they have at last struggled and grown so much, they will need their own story.

I'm also doing something completely off kilter for me, Siren, a very sensual historical fantasy of the sea. You can see the video for it on YouTube even though I haven't yet finished the book. It was my first video, but I've very proud of it. I think I'll be very proud of the book too.

You see, I love writing risky stuff. And I think I'm finally getting the idea that I don't have to write what I don't want to write. Yes, true, I'd love to be rich and famous. But not quite as much as I love writing my stories my way. I think that's called being eccentric. But that's okay. I'm old enough now that eccentric sounds good to me.

Fast Forward? Or Rewind?


Let's talk about--pacing. Not the sort I do on a treadmill (or should be doing--that 10 pounds won't lose itself before RWA!). The kind that moves stories along. It all sounds dull, doesn't it, especially compared with hunky heroes and sparkly dialogue, but it's vital. Without the right pacing, Mr. Hunk is mired in the quicksand. When it's 'on', hopefully the reader doesn't notice it at all. They're too busy skipping happily through the engrossing story. When it's off--well, readers can feel caught in the quicksand, too.

Here is what made me think about it--movies. Two of them. I was watching the DVD of The Holiday. Amanda and Iris (aka Cameron Diaz and Kate Winslet) switch houses for Christmas, to get away from disastrous relationships, etc. Kate goes to Cameron's fab mansion in L.A., Cameron to Kate's ramshackle (but probably vastly expensive) cottage in Surrey.

There's quite a bit I like in this movie. The two women are appealing characters, their stories interesting enough--I wanted them to find love and be happy! And, let's face it, the Jude Law character is like my Ideal Man. He's English, a book editor, has a terrific London house and 2 adorable daughters, and is funny and emotionally aware on top of it. Kate's story involves a bit more wheel-spinning and a purported sort-of romance with Jack Black, of all people, but I like her. So far--good.

But, let's talk editing. This movie tries to tell two stories, and yet the set-up alone takes nearly half an hour. We see what jerks the respective ex-boyfriends are (repeatedly), how neurotic Amanda is and how insecure Iris is (again, repeatedly). There are long scenes about the on-line house swap, driving to the houses, etc. I ended up fast-forwarding a bit here, and still had no trouble following the story at all. The set-up could have taken, oh, about ten minutes, and we would have gotten to Jude Law, I mean the rest of the story, sooner.

Contrast this with a gem I saw in the theater last weekend, Miss Pettigrew Lives for a Day. The roles, every one of them, were perfectly cast. From the leads (Amy Adams and Frances McDormand), to the so-called villain (the wonderful Shirley Henderson), to the men (2 Jane Austen film vets, Ciaran Hinds and Mark Strong, and the Pie Maker, er, Lee Pace. I knew from Pushing Daisies he was cute--now I see he's sexy, too!). Every scene is vital to moving the story forward. Not a line of dialogue is wasted. The world of late '30s London is beautifully built through sets and costumes. The actors can just be let loose into the story, and it all falls into sparkly (and ultimately very emotionally moving) place.

This pacing thing is something I really worry about as a writer. Where should the story even start? There's always backstory a reader needs to know, but we don't want to bore the snot out of them in Chapter One, and thus prompt fast-forwarding (like I did with The Holiday). Without a strict word count and some deadline structure, I do tend to meander a bit. I'm working on my Balthazar/1530s Caribbean book right now. I did lots of research for this one, on ships, life in the islands, nautical charts, pirates, etc. In addition, the characters have rather, um, complicated pasts (and personalities!) that are important to their relationship now.

How much of all this do I put in? When? What's really important, and what's just my half-hour set-up? I struggle a bit with this these days. But I do get a great deal of inspiration from looking at images like this one of Orlando!

So, I need your help. What do you like to see in stories? What can you do without? What makes you fast-forward through movies or books? And have you seen The Holiday or Miss Pettigrew (I recommend both, BTW!)??

Happy Easter, everyone! Save me some Cadbury Caramel eggs. And a Godiva chocolate bunny. (Oh, and Keira informed me that A Sinful Alliance is now being shipped from Amazon! Yay! Next Saturday join us for a chance to win an autographed copy--but if you can't wait...)

Looking For Love In All The Wrong Places


My brain resembles nothing more than confetti on a windy day: "Where does the towel bar go?" swoops by, followed by a scrap of paper with "Remember to pay the ConEd bill" and another one announcing "I am even more tired than usual."

See, it's Moving Week here at Casa Frampton.

BUT I have had time to do some fun stuff--my Eight Year-Old son got his report card last week, and we had promised him if he got good grades he could watch Hellboy starring Ron Perlman and Selma Blair (interesting sidenote: Rupert Evans who played Margaret's brother in Frampton Obsession North and South is in this, too). (Let's not talk about an eight year-old watching a PG-13 movie with that title. He can handle it, is all I can say, although other random things freak him out. Go figure).

I loved it, too. And, of course, it's got a romance--Hellboy loves Liz, but things don't come to a resolution until the end, when they engage in a (literally) fiery kiss. And I realized, yet again, as I watched and sighed, that I always search out the romance. And, if you are liberal in your application, romance is everywhere: In fairy tales, in mysteries (although Miss Marple's love interest might just be tea), in film (and if it's not a romance, the character might just be in love with power, or money, or his or her own neuroses), the X Files, in celebrity gossip (who's Paris in love with this week?)

I bet regular romance readers look for the romance all the time--we, as Chuck Woolery might say, need to find the Love Connection (see, I told you I was scattered. Name-checking Chuck Woolery?!? I am definitely off my rocker).

So what are your favorite 'It's secretly about the romance' pieces of media?


Megan

PS: As another sidenote, I really miss writing. I cannot wait until I can get back to it. Leaves a large gap in my life.

Shameless self promotion


I don't do this too often so today I'm talking about me!me!me!

First off, the DA BWAHAHA Tournament kicks off its voting today, at Smart Bitches Trashy Books and Dear Author. I have, ahem, two books--The Rules of Gentility and Forbidden Shores, in historical and erotic category respectively. So check in at both locations and vote for me--

UPDATE, FRIDAY 3/21: I'm up again--Vote for Forbidden Shores before 3:00EST today at Dear Author. Thanks!

Pause for rant. I get very annoyed by being asked to vote for books I haven't read by people I may not know on a zillion different places online. Do I vote because I like the person who wrote the book or the person who asked me to vote? What if I like or know either of them but thought the book was rubbish? Or hadn't read it?

Well, now that's your problem. Share your views on this phenomenon, if you like...

And now for the big news--I have a three-book contract with Little Black Dress (UK) for more Regency chicklit, who are also publishing their edition of The Rules this September. I'm their first historical writer. I don't know when the first of the three books will be out but the heroine (a very naughty girl) is Caroline, who makes a brief appearance in The Rules, trying to get into Inigo's (tight) trousers.

I'm in good company at LBD, with talented writers like Julie Cohen (who by an odd coincidence is one of my CP's best friends and lives in my home town of Reading). Her latest LBD book One Night Stand is set in Reading, the town where Oscar Wilde went to goal and Jane Austen to school (or, as I like to say, possibly the other way round).

Bad news is LBD titles aren't distributed in the US--but you'll be able to buy them on amazon.co.uk and at LBD's site.

So I'm celebrating!

Setting or Story?

Right now, I'm taking a break between drafts of my mess-in-progress to fill some research craters in my story. I know that the most organized writers say one should do research beforehand. I actually do that, but then my characters go places and do things I hadn't envisioned at the start. Which means another round of research, going back through books I've already read to find things I didn't realize I should have taken notes on.

It makes me wonder which really comes first for me: the setting or the story.

Many of my stories ideas come from tidbits of historical accounts I've read. Yet once I get going, the story comes over. I think (I hope!) this is where the deeper and more universal themes start surfacing. This is the point where I go back through my sources to try to make the history fit--or at least be able to write a good Author's Note explaining what I've tweaked.

I've heard some people say that a Regency (perhaps they meant the traditional Regency) should be a story that couldn't possibly take place in any other setting. On the other hand, how about the transformation of Pride & Prejudice to Bridget Jones's Diary or Emma to Clueless?

I know these reinventions don't work for some but they do for me. I think it's because the characters and the stories are timeless. And yet there's more to these adaptations than just translating clothing and cultural references. The setting isn't just a backdrop, any more than Jane Austen's "3 or 4 families in a country village". It's all in how the universal story finds expression in a new setting.

So what do you think comes first, setting or story?

Or do they feed each other, as I'm beginning to think?

Elena
www.elenagreene.com

Words We Really Like

I like words.

I know -- shocking revelation for a writer to make. But there it is. I like words.

And some words, I really like...either for their sound, or their meaning, or some strange essence they possess...

Today, words that fall into my "really like" column include:

deciduous

concatenation

lucidity

paraphrase

plethora

soothing

bombast

peregrination

shutters


How about you? What words do you like to say, read or write, due to their inner (or outer) beauty?

All opinions welcome!


Cara
Cara King, author of the soothing and rarely bombastic MY LADY GAMESTER, a book that does not contain the words "deciduous" or "concatenation"

Everyone Is Irish On St Patrick's Day

Growing up, I always loved St. Patrick's Day with its celebration of all things Irish. To me, the Irish people were plucky, brave and proud--survivors of terrible adversity. I lapped up tales of the potato famines, of how the Irish emigrated to America, and of how they battled discrimination when they landed. I cheered the triumph of Irish Americans in our society. Countrywide celebration of St. Patrick's Day is evidence of a hard battle won.

I was, therefore, very proud of my Irish heritage. Whenever I heard my mother's maiden name spoken, I could envision the rich, green countryside of our ancestral home.

I was well into adulthood when I happened to ask my mother and aunt, "During which potato famine did our ancestors flee Ireland?"

Their response:

"Ireland?"
Long pause.
"Well, I suppose we might have an Irish relative somewhere but we came from Alsace-Lorraine."

I was devastated.
Not only was I not Irish, but I had concocted a history for myself that was totally false. How could I do that?
I was writing fiction even before I knew it!

Nonetheless, what I love about the Irish and Ireland I still love about them, even if the connection is only in my heart. I like to hint at the attitude about the Irish during the Regency. There was a lot simmering under the surface.

I tried to show a little of this in Innocence & Impropriety My hero and heroine of that book are Irish.

Many important figures in English history around the Regency time period have Irish roots. Castlereagh and Wellington, for example, were descended from Irish landowners, although they were anglicized protestants, more English than Irish, you might say. There were also several Irish literary figures within a hundred years or so of the Regency, also anglicized protestants. Jonathan Swift, Oliver Goldsmith, Bram Stoker, W. B. Yeats, Oscar Wilde, to name a few.

It will be exciting to read Amanda's Grand Central books set in the time of the Irish rebellion, even if we do have to wait until 2010. In the meantime, we can get our fill of Irish Medievals from Michelle Willingham.

By the way, go to Harlequin and click on the clover. You can purchase Michelle's Her Warrior King for 40% off.

Can you think of any other Irish Historical romances that we should put on our TBR piles?

And who out there is Irish today?
I am!!!

Early St. Patrick's Day!


Happy Saturday, everyone! St. Patrick's Day is not actually until Monday, of course, but I'm off to the St. Patrick's Day Ball tonight (with my black and white dress, plus a green chiffon shawl and a big fake emerald ring--thanks for the accessories advice last week!). Plus I got an early St. P's Day present this week. I sold a trilogy to Grand Central Publishing!!!

Now, how does this fit in with the Shamrocks and Slip Jigs theme? The series, tentatively called "The Daughters of Ireland," is set in Ireland and London around the events of the 1798 Rebellion. I'm very excited to get to tackle a book set in Ireland amid so much drama and upheaval--Ireland is very big in the McCabe Family. It seems like a place just meant for romance and passion.

Book One, called Countess of Scandal (but which will probably be something different later) comes out sometime in 2010. It features the first of the three Blacknall sisters, Elizabeth (Eliza). She is a young, rich widowed countess, the daughter of a wealthy Anglo-Irish family. But she has a secret--she writes seditious pamphlets for the United Irishmen, and hides fugitives in the cellars of her vast Dublin townhouse. She's devoted to Irish freedom, but a serious problem pops up in the person of her childhood sweetheart, Will Denton, the son of her family's equally wealthy neighbors. He left her when she was young to join the Army and go off to the West Indies, breaking her heart. Now he's back--and he's Major William Denton, sent to Ireland to quell the growing unrest. He knows Eliza is up to something dangerous, and is just as determined to stop her as she is to fulfill her mission. If they can keep from falling hopelessly in love all over again.

I am very excited about this series! Of course, now I have to actually get to work and write them...

And, in the spirit of All Things Irish, here are a few facts I found about Guinness (to go with your corned beef and cabbage):
--Arthur Guinness started brewing the famous stout in Dublin in 1759, having purchased a dormant brewery with 100 pounds from his godfather's will. He signed a 9000 year lease on that brewery, with an annual rent of 45 pounds (still in effect, I would think)
--10 million glasses of Guinness are drunk every day around the world
--A pint of Guinness Draught has fewer calories than a pint of 2% milk or a pint of orange juice
--The Guiness Storehouse in Dublin is one of their most-visited tourist attractions, with over 750,000 visitors every year

So, Cheers to everyone this St. Patrick's Day! I'm so happy to share my news with all the Riskies! What are your plans for the holiday?

My Mind Has Blown

Last week, I talked about word-of-mouth and two books that topped the AAR Annual Poll. So, as promised, last week I started to read If His Kiss Is Wicked by Jo Goodman.

So now my mind is blown. I'm on page 152--152!!--and the hero and heroine have not had any sexual contact, not a kiss, even!

AND Jo Goodman has a few sections that seem to be in double point-of-view at the same time, in other words, you can hear both sides of the h/h's brain. Double Mind-Blowing!

Common wisdom, by which I mean every single writers' workshop, says the current trend is to have sex, or a sexual encounter, within about the first ten pages. Also, agents and editors and writers will all warn about multiple POVs, following it up with the Nora Caveat, by which they mean "Nora Roberts has multiple POVs, but she can do it, you can't."

And this book got tied for the Best Romance in 2007?!? Yow! I don't argue as to its merit, it is excellent, and compelling, and has intriguing characters and a great set-up, etc., but I am amazed that a book that broke two of the most steadfast Romance Writing Rules won.

So, yay! Yay for Rule-breakers! Yay for Adventurous Readers! And for you Adventurous Readers, what rule do you like to see broken? For Adventurous Writers, what rules do you like to break?

Herschel revisited

I found out just today, that (1) it was a Thursday and therefore my day to post and (2) on March 13, 1781, William Herschel discovered Uranus. This is very fortuitous, because the Herschel Museum of Astronomy in Bath is one of my very favorite places--I blogged about it long ago on September 8, 2005, when we were all brand spanking new here; and Elena blogged about Herschel's sister Charlotte a couple of years ago. Search the blog for Herschel and you'll find all sorts of references--his name just keeps coming up.

So who was Herschel and why was he so important? In the words of Patrick Moore, patron of the Herschel Museum, William Herschel was the first man to give a reasonably correct picture of the shape of our star-system or galaxy; he was the best telescope-maker of his time, and possibly the greatest observer who ever lived.

And his achievements were all the more impressive because Herschel, a refugee from Hanover (Germany) was self-taught and became an astronomer more or less by accident. He was a musician by training, who received a telescope in lieu of payment, looked the instrument over and decided he could create a better one.

The Museum, at 19 New King Street in Bath, is a modest building in the sort of street where artisans lived. It's beautifully and faithfully restored to the period, and filled with Herschel's telescopes and books. Sadly, the Octagon Chapel nearby, one of Bath's most fashionable churches in the eighteenth century, where Herschel held the position of organist, was closed and badly in need of restoration. (Or at least it was when I last visited two years ago. The organ itself, pictured here, no longer exists. And people in the museum were hopping mad that the city was pouring money into the new Thermae Bath Spa.) Does anyone know what the latest on the Octagon Chapel is? Jane Austen--you may have heard of her--was one of the many visitors to Bath who attended services there.

But back to Herschel. The small house on New King Street was flooded with visitors including the King, after whom Herschel named the new planet, Georgium Sidus, but the name never caught on. He was awarded the Copley medal and elected a member of the Royal Society, and then appointed Astronomer Royal in 1782, which necessitated a move to Slough, near Windsor. His descendants, some of whom were also astronomers, lived in the same house until the mid-twentieth century. Guess what happened to the house...


How do you feel about preservation vs. modernization? If you were in charge of a historic city, what would your priorities be? How would you reconcile commerce with history?

And has anyone visited the Thermae Spa? When I was in Bath they were selling very expensive products connected with it, but it wasn't yet open.

Can you pronounce Uranus with a straight face? (The official museum pronunciation is you-RIN-us which isn't much better).

Send an e-mail to riskies@yahoo.com with NEWSLETTER in the subject line to be apprised of the movements of the Planet Risky.

Drafting and polishing

About a week ago I finished the 3rd draft of my mess-in-progress. Maybe it's my imagination, but do I hear a collective groan? Or is it just that I sometimes feel as if five years from now I'll be announcing the completion of the 327th draft or thereabouts. Because sometimes--and particularly with this story--I wonder if I'm just repainting the Golden Gate Bridge one more time.

A happier metaphor for my writing process involves skiing. When I've been to ski resorts with friends, most of them like to try as many different slopes as possible. Once they've gotten down a slope in one piece they feel they've "conquered" it. Me, I like to keep at it until I get it "right". The first few times I'm just trying to figure out the fall line, where the ice patches and moguls are, etc... Once I've done that, I can approach it with confidence and something I hope approaches grace.

With my writing it's the same. Unlike other creative people who start a project--which could be a novel, a sweater or a computer program--in a spirit of fun and adventure, I'm always worrying about failure. I know, I'm a wimp! So it takes me 2-3 drafts to get a good feel for my characters and plot. Then comes my favorite part of the process: putting it all together, polishing until it feels right. And I'm finally there. :)

Anyway, I'm not saying that others don't do a good job with finishing and polishing. Professionals do all the parts of the process, even those we find scary, tedious, unpleasant or whatever. It's just that we all have our favorite parts.

So how about you? Do you enjoy starting a project of any sort? Or do you prefer the final stages, when it all comes together? How about the messy process in between? Or do you enjoy it all (in which case I'll try not to be too envious)?

Elena
www.elenagreene.com

AUSTEN TREK: Tribble and Prejudice

AUSTEN TREK: or, if Jane Austen wrote Star Trek...

It is a truth universally acknowledged, that a single captain in possession of a starship, must be in want of a tribble.

However little known the feelings or views of a captain may be on his first entering a space station, this truth is so well fixed in the mind of a con-artist like Cyrano Jones, that the captain is considered the rightful property of some one or other of the tribbles.

"My dear Captain Kirk," said Cyrano Jones to him during his first day on Deep Space Station K7, "have you heard that I possess a miraculous cure for high blood pressure?"

Kirk replied that he had not.

"But it is true," returned the trader; "for Doctor McCoy's tricorder has just been here, and confirmed it beyond all doubt."

Captain Kirk made no answer.

"Do you not want to know how I cure it?" cried Cyrano Jones impatiently.

"YOU want to tell me, and I have no objection to hearing it."

This was invitation enough.

"Why, my dear captain, you must know, I have in my possession a rare and invaluable creature, the like of which none but the wise ancients of Organia have ever before possessed."

"What is it called?"

"Tribble."

"Is this tribble a group, or a single creature?"

"Oh! Single, my dear Captain Kirk, to be sure! A single tribble, but with a large capacity for reproduction: it will yield four or five thousand a year. What a fine thing for your crew of four-hundred and thirty!"

"How so? How can it affect them?"

"My dear James Kirk," replied the trader, "how can you be so tiresome! You must know that I am thinking of you purchasing a tribble for them."

"Is that your design in speaking to me?"

"Design! Nonsense, how can you talk so! But it is very likely that you MAY fall in love with one of them, and therefore you should look over my stock carefully."

"I see no occasion for that. You may send the tribbles away, or you may choose to accompany them, which perhaps will be still better, for inasmuch as you are as annoying as they are silly and ignorant, I am less likely to end by striking you if your face is not in the same room as my fist."


And the question for today is: Do you like Austen Trek? Hate it? Do you want to see variations on it (e.g. Bronte Trek, Heyer Trek, Austen of the Lost Ark, etc)?

And if you want to read previous installments of Austen Trek, just click on the words "Austen Trek" at the bottom of this post!


Cara
Cara King, going where no Regency writer has gone before...

Promotion

Deb Marlowe's question about book trailers on Amanda's post Saturday got me thinking about promotion. Believe me, after you get that magical, most-sought-after, long desired book contract, you immediately start agonizing about promotion. After wanting so desperately to get the book published now you want the book to do well. That means promotion.

I haven't a clue what promotion really works so I'm asking our Risky Regency community. What works for you?

I'm not talking about reviews or word-of-mouth or bookcovers or backcover copy, because we really have no control over those things. I mean the promotion we do have control over, the kind that helps you remember the book or the author.

Are you influenced by Book Trailers?
Here is one I think is great! So clever. Done by Diana Holquist.
Speaking of clever, you can't beat these by fellow Wet Noodle Posse Noodler Jill Monroe, for her Primal Instincts and another for Gena Showalter's Savor Me Slowly.


What about websites? We're told a website is an essential promotional tool. Last year I made a big investment in a new website. Do you think a website is important? If so, why?

Do you think the cover of Romantic Times magazine helps you remember a book or its author?

How about an ad in RT?





What about banner ads? I don't do many of those but I wonder if they are good advertising.

How about promotional materials? Totes? T-shirts? Here are some I did through CafePress.com as contest prizes.








This is my absolute favorite promotional item that I've ever done. I only gave away a limited number and I didn't care if they were effective or not. They were sooooo much fun. (Get it? It's a "Reputable Rake")

What about things like magnets, Do Not Disturb signs, mirrors, emery boards (love those!), chip clips, pens, pencils--all those thing we get in conference goody bags and goody rooms? I've never done any of those.

And last of all---Bookmarks!!
I always do bookmarks for my books and I really love them, because you can carry them with you easily and you can give them out at booksignings or anywhere! I often give them out like business cards.

Do you like bookmarks?





Sometimes photography is used in promotion. Like this promotional photo from PS I Love You (Gerard Butler reclining, Keira!)Lots of questions here, Riskies.....Tell me what you think!

What I'm Thinking About This Week

1) Our own Risky Diane got a great review in the Chicago Tribune this week, for The Vanishing Viscountess! It says the story is "expertly spiced with adventure and passion." But then, we here already knew that!!!


2) Websites: some updates have gone up on mine, including an excerpt from my April book, A Sinful Alliance! (Which got 4 stars from RT, plus a KISS award for the hero, Nicolai. Yay for him! And I still say he is not the bad-hair dude on the cover...)


3) Book trailers. I'm always trying to come up with new ways to "get the word out" about our books, so I've been watching a few of these on author websites and YouTube. I'm not sure they're for me--for one thing, I'm a techno-idjit and would have to get someone else to do one for me. For another, I would be annoyingly picky. I would want it to look like a Real movie trailer (like this one, for instance), but I have a feeling it would end up like "The Humans Are Dead" bit on Flight of the Conchords. That's the one where their incompetent band manager Murray films it on his cell phone. So, this is probably not for me right now. What do you think of the trailers? Have any made you want to pick up the book?


But I am doing a book signing at a local Renaissance fair next month! (For my Renaissance-set books, get it??). I've never done this before, and am a bit nervous, but at least it's an excuse for a new costume.







4) Speaking of clothes, I have to go to a St. Patrick's Day fundraiser ball for work on the 15th, which is another excuse for something new! I really want something like Amy Adams's Oscar gown (it's green, see?), but time and fundage may mean I have to wear a dress I recently bought for RWA. It's black and white, so I need something green to go with it. Emeralds would be great, but again the fundage. Any suggestions?



5) Shakespeare. For some reason he's all over the place in my life lately! From Netflix I got 2 of the BBC's Shakespeare Retold movies (Midsummer Night's Dream and a great Taming of the Shrew with Shirley Henderson and Rufus Sewell, both movies were excellent!), and I've been reading The Lodger Shakespeare by Charles Nicholl, which takes Shakespeare's brief appearance in an early 17th century lawsuit involving his ex-landlords and makes a whole (and fascinating) book out of it. Plus I have a new book bought with the last of my birthday Barnes and Noble gift cards called Filthy Shakespeare: Shakespeare's Most Outrageous Sexual Puns. This one is so hilarious it deserves its own post, so stay tuned.






7) Orlando. Of course. Just because.

So, to recap--reviews, book trailers, green dresses, Shakespeare, Orlando, Renaissance fairs, Flight of the Conchords. Oh, and tea. What are you thinking about this week?

Word Of Mouth


As hinted at (if by hinted you mean COMPLAIN VOCIFEROUSLY) a few weeks ago, I am in the throes of moving. Which means writing, reading, etc., has been tossed out the window.

BUT that doesn't mean you have to suffer (but if you want to, could you just pick that box up over there? Thanks.)


So let's talk about books, shall we? Specifically, very good books. The All About Romance poll (I used to review for them a long time ago, I am a big fan of the site) just released its results for 2007, and the Best Romance for 2007 was . . . a tie! Between If His Kiss Is Wicked by Jo Goodman and The Serpent Prince by Elizabeth Hoyt.

Did you notice that both were historical novels? Goodman's is Regency-set, whereas Hoyt writes Georgian. I've read the Hoyt--which I liked, although not as much as I liked her Raven Prince--and I have the Goodman in my bag right now.

It's pretty obvious now, but worriers who wanted to ring the death knell for historicals have been denied. The vamps did a good job at rattling historical's cage, but historicals refuse to go away. Something about those feisty heroines . . . anyway.

I had the Goodman because various reader bloggers had raved about it, and I stuck it in a past Amazon order. I put it in my bag because of the poll, which leads me to some questions--besides reading every single word all of us Riskies have penned, how else do you find your books? Would you be inclined to read a Best Romance, even if it were in a genre you don't normally read? Do you rely on the author quotes on the front? How the cover looks?

And the eternal question, what other time period besides Georgian/Regency piques your interest?

Thanks, and I'd say to wish me luck on the move, but I'll be griping about it next week. Make sure to tune in.

Megan
PS: That last pic has nothing to do with nothing. Thanks to Abby for it.

Unspeakable and inedible

What is it about titles that sets us all a-flutter? What is it with all those dukes and earls and pedigreed persons and why have they become such a staple of historical romance?

Maybe it's because they're powerful alpha males in tight pants. Or it's a fundamental yearning manifested by a fascination with the young, rich, and pretty behaving badly (Paris, Britney et al) and attempts to establish a dynasty in the White House. We never had a chance at royalty after the unfortunate episode with the tea in Boston harbor, and now we're trying to compensate.

I think it's quite a reality check for Americans to realize how indifferent the English are about their great families, including the Windsors, unless they provide an excuse for a party or a really good national cry. All that anachronistic pomp and circumstance; all that inbred dullness. Yet the aristocracy still have that promise, even if it's not fulfilled, of glamor and beauty and being bigger than life; and two hundred years ago they did have more interesting lives and more opportunities than the riff-raff. The rich and beautiful cavorting around Carlton House makes for better escapist reading than, say, trying to find firewood and cooking up the cabbage in the last smear of bacon fat.

And look at the stuff they were good at! Sports, like fencing, all dash and expertise.

Getting drunk, a favorite pastime of just about everyone in England, then and now, which I suppose takes a dash and expertise all of its own.

Hunting small furry things which apparently also enjoy the sport.


And all that good stuff with dogs and horses and art--even if the art technically didn't belong to them but was lying around neglected somewhere classical.

So my question is, do you ever feel that we've gone overboard with aristos in romance? Does the appearance of yet another young, handsome, single duke make your heart sing or sink? Or do you accept it as part of the fantasy?

Heroes: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly

Last week I blogged about the actresses I used as inspiration for my heroines. I said then that I was less happy with the cover art for some of my heroes and this week I'll prove it!

For the hero of LORD LANGDON'S KISS I suggested Rutger Hauer. I was on a Ladyhawke kick (anyone else love that movie?) and though of course the garb is not period, the whole "stalwart knight" thing suited his personality. I don't think that quality translated through the obligatory Regency smile but at least he is tall and blond as I described him.





Part of my inspiration for Philip, the hero of THE INCORRIGIBLE LADY CATHERINE, was a recording I had of Bryn Terfel singing folk songs. I imagined Philip as a man with a wonderful, rich baritone voice, not conventionally handsome but with striking eyes. I sent in an image of Terfel that I thought might work but what a mistake that was! Can you feel my pain?





With THE REDWYCK CHARM my luck improved. I sent in Michael Vartan and though I'm not sure this cover hero resembles him (and the hair is a bit weird) at least he is good-looking!





My best cover hero came in SAVING LORD VERWOOD. I learned later that the cover model was the popular John DeSalvo but he does capture the look I was going for with Jeremy Northam. Overall, it was a nice cover and came in 3rd in the historical series category of the All About Romance cover contest that year. I'm not complaining, this hero is very fine. :)





Now to my last cover hero. I sent in Colin Firth and got...this dude. Ack! I was glad the background color was striking and the actual image was so small. If anyone could really tell how Very Wrong this hero looks, I would have cried.

So what do you think?

And though I already know the likely suspects, who would you most like to see on a romance cover?

Elena
www.elenagreene.com

Jane, please contact us again!

Hi, Jane!

Your email seems to have gotten lost in cyberspace but we really want to get you your copies of TO CATCH A ROGUE by Amanda McCabe and AN IMPROPER ARISTOCRAT by Deb Marlowe.

Please email us again at riskies@yahoo.com and we hope this time it works!

JANE AUSTEN MOVIE CLUB: Pride and Prejudice (1940)


Welcome to the Risky Regencies JANE AUSTEN MOVIE CLUB!

Here we meet on the first Tuesday of every month ("and sometimes oftener," as Wilde would say), to discuss TV and film adaptations of Jane Austen's works.

Today: the 1940 film of PRIDE AND PREJUDICE!

First, let me say -- Wow. What a poster.

"Five love hungry beauties in search of HUSBANDS!!" (And we think our back-cover blurbs occasionally lack in subtlety!)

While we're on the subject of the poster...note how Olivier's hair and clothing differ from what he's wearing in the film (shown below) -- the poster shows him in a 1940's tuxedo! (And the sidewhiskers are gone!)

I know some folks love this film, and some hate it...and many have mixed feelings. So hopefully we'll have some interesting discussion!

As usual, to aid everyone's memory, here are the major credits from the film (courtesy IMDB):


DIRECTOR: Robert Z. Leonard

SCREENPLAY: Aldous Huxley and Jane Murfin
(based on the "dramatisation" by Helen Jerome)

(By the way, this wasn't Huxley's only screenwriting credit -- He also co-wrote the screenplay for the 1944 JANE EYRE.)

CAST:

Greer Garson: Elizabeth Bennet

Mary Boland: Mrs. Bennet

Maureen O'Sullivan: Jane Bennet

Edna May Oliver: Lady Catherine de Bourgh

Laurence Olivier: Mr. Darcy

(Fans of films set during the Regency and 18th century may also have seen Olivier as Lord Nelson in 1941's THAT HAMILTON WOMAN, MacHeath in the 1953 BEGGAR'S OPERA, and as the Duke of Wellington in the 1972 LADY CAROLINE LAMB.)

Ann Rutherford: Lydia Bennet

Frieda Inescort: Caroline Bingley

Edmund Gwenn: Mr. Bennet

Karen Morley: Charlotte

Heather Angel: Kitty Bennet

Marsha Hunt: Mary Bennet

Bruce Lester: Charles Bingley

Edward Ashley: George Wickham

Melville Cooper: Mr. Collins

Marten Lamont: Mr. Denny

E.E. Clive: Sir William Lucas

May Beatty: Mrs. Philips

Marjorie Wood: Lady Lucas

Gia Kent: Anne de Bourgh



So: what did you think? What are your feelings on the casting, the costumes, the script, the music -- anything?

All responses welcome!

And join us again on March 25, when we discuss the Kate Beckinsale version of EMMA, and on the first Tuesday in April, when we discuss the first half of the new SENSE & SENSIBILITY!

Cara
Cara King, author of MY LADY GAMESTER, who would be constantly dragging her sleeves in her dinner if she wore what those women were wearing!

Winter is on my head, but eternal spring is in my heart--Victor Hugo

Megan got me started with this talk of "The Februarys" and pining for Spring, and Andrea Pickens didn't help by talking about traveling to Scotland and Ireland.

I'm yearning for Springtime in England. It has been three years since I've seen England and that is way too long. I won't be there this year, though, but I went so far as to do a search on Garden Tours of England.

The first up is Coopersmith's One of a Kind Tours
British Isles
Springtime in the Cotswolds
the Malvern Gardening Show
Scottish Highlands & Islands
the Chelsea Flower Show
Springtime in Ireland: Gardens, Castles & Landscapes (This one is their special of the month)
North Yorkshire Gardens, Country Inns & Stately Homes & Gardens
Haunts of English Artists, Writers and Horticulturists

Next is Lucas and Randall Tour the Gardens of Europe.
Alas their website says "Lucas and Randall is no longer accepting reservations for the 2008 season." Now I think I've missed something!

There is plenty to select from Lynott Tours, though. The one that interests me most is "Chelsea Garden Show with Visits to Kent and Sussex," but that is because they say there is only one space left!

Sigh.
I think I'll go on a virtual tour, revisiting gardens we saw on my 2005 visit to England, the Romantic Road North Tour. Wanna come with me?
(I may not have the correct garden attached to the correct estate, so feel free to correct me)

Buckingham Palace - we started our tour in London, naturally. On our walk past Buckingham Palace we saw Prince Charles and Camilla leaving in a limo. Prince Charles waved to us.








Grimsthorpe Castle - this is a view from a window of the castle








Knebworth House - so many beautiful flowers here








Chatsworth - again a view from a window. Indescribably beautiful!








Haddon Hall - this medevial house was a big contrast to Chatsworth, but its gardens were wild and gorgeous








Beningbrough Hall - lots of gardens here








Norton Conyers - one of my favorite places on the tour. Still a private house, it is thought to be Charlotte Bronte's model for Thornfield. It is known that she visited the house and the family recently discovered a windowless room in the attic where a madwoman might have lived.








Duncombe Park - a view of a very formal garden








Floors Castle - lots of beautiful flowers here








Edinburgh - no garden but a beautiful view!








Where in the world would you like to be this Spring?
Are you planning a garden this year? What will you plant?

There is still time to enter my contest to win a copy of Kathryn Caskie's How to Seduce a Duke and my The Mysterious Miss M. Enter Here

Don't miss our Risky Regency newsletter. Send to riskies@yahoo.com and put "newsletter" in the subject line

Riskies Welcome Back Andrea Pickens!


Tell us about Seduced by a Spy!

It's the second book of my trilogy starring the swashbuckling students of Mrs. Merlin's Academy for Select Young Ladies, which is sort of a Hogwarts for hellions! Trained as an elite cadre of female spies, they are England's ultimate secret weapon--dispatched to handle the most difficult, dangerous missions. Shannon, the heroine of SBAS, appeared briefly in The Spy Wore Silk, where she crossed swords with a mysterious Russian as she and her roommate Siena sought to trap a traitor who was passing government secrets to the French.

In SBAS, she meets with Mr. Orlov again, but this time they're allies on a joint mission for British and Russian Intelligence. Though neither is happy about this assignment, they're sent to a remote castle in the Scottish Highlands to protect the family of a military ballistics expert from a French assassin.

Sparks fly as they rub together--igniting what I hope readers find is a fun, sexy, action-packed read!

What gave you the idea for this story, and the whole "Hellions" series?

I've always been a bit of a tomboy. As a kid, I wanted to be a knight who got to fight the dragons instead of the typical princess who needed to be rescued. I guess this never quite rubbed off (I'm still more comfortable in jeans and a sweatshirt than a slinky black dress!), and I've always liked strong, unconventional heroines who challenge the status quo and aren't afraid of breaking rules.

So in thinking of the Regency era, and how I might do something a little unexpected, I got to thinking--what would be the least likely endeavor for a female to be involved in? A 'secret agent' came to mind, and as a big fan of the old James Bond movies, I thought it would be a fun idea to pursue. And so the hellions of Mrs. Merlin's Academy were born!

I've had so much fun creating stories for the trio of roommates, and I've tried to put each one in a different situation. Seduced by a Spy is very action-oriented, set mostly in Scotland. The final book, Sofia's story, will hit the shelves in October 2008. It takes place in London, in the glitter and glamor of high Society.

What attracts you to the Regency as a setting?

For me, the Regency is so fascinating because in many ways it's a mirror of our own times. There were such tremendous upheavals in all aspects of life, from literature, music, and philosophy to politics, science, and social conventions. So many new and exciting things were happening, and I love researching and discovering how people reacted to the challenge of change.

And of course I adore the romance of the era--the gowns, the tailored finery of the gentlemen, the glamorous balls and soirees! It has a fairy-tale aspect that makes it a wonderful setting for richly complex stories. I think all of us who write Regency-set books love the fact that we can have fun with those details while exploring complex themes that are so relevant to modern readers.



Did you come across anything new or interesting in researching this story?

I was lucky enough to travel to Ireland and Scotland during the time I was writing Seduced by a Spy! I discovered a wealth of fascinating facts there. Strangely enough, many of them revolve around--spirits (the alcoholic kind!)

1) There are close to 200 single malt scotches made in small distilleries throughout Scotland (If you have ever experienced the weather in the Highlands, where my fictional McAllister Castle is located, you will understand why!)



2) In both Scotch and Irish Gaelic, the words uisge beatha and usquebaugh mean "water of life." This eventually translated into "whisky" in English (no doubt after someone consumed more than a few drams of the stuff). Another interesting aside is that it's spelled "whisky" in Scotland and "whiskey" in Ireland.

3) The local brew of Dornoch (the seaside town where Shannon and Orlov first land to begin their trip to the hills) is Glenmorangie, which means "glen of tranquility" in Gaelic. It was founded in 1848, but illicit distilling in the area dates back to the 1700s.

4) Kenmare, the charming town of the Ring of Kerry where Shannon helps the wounded Orlov to the safety of a British naval cutter, has been renowned for its healing waters since the 1600s. Today, it's also known as the home of Sheen Falls Lodge, a wonderful country manor hotel that has the largest wine cellar in Ireland. (Trust me on this!)

5) Saltpeter, one of the 3 essential ingredients in gunpowder, is found in nitrates, so during the Napoleonic Wars, the British government considered requiring tavernkeepers to save the urine of their patrons in vats. (Brandy was said to create an especially desirable end product)

LOL! What is "risky" about this story?

Well, I think I may have pushed my heroines to the edge with their swordplay and seduction! I wanted them to dare to shake things up--like many of the real-life Regency women, who weren't afraid of breaking out of their traditional roles.

One online reviewer got all huffy about the first book in the series, saying "This isn't how a Regency romance should be written!" I'm actually sort of proud of that. Obviously she believes that the era entirely revolved around drawing room calls and formal house parties. But we can't forget there was so much more to the times, much of which was "down and dirty." It was a time of war and intrigue, with actual characters like the cross-dressing Comte d'Eon, a double agent who changed his allegiances as often as he changed his sexual persona. Sometimes truth is stranger than fiction!

What's next for you?

I'm very excited about a new trilogy that I'm doing for Grand Central Publishing, about a trip of unconventional female scholars who formed a bond of friendship through the weekly meetings of their Scientific Society. Each has an expertise in a certain field of science--and each has a slightly shady past that comes back to haunt them. The books are scheduled for a 1-2-3 release starting in January 2010.

As for other projects, I'm trying to convince my new editor to let me do a book starring lord Lynsley, the head of the Merlins. And I'm fooling with a Regency-set YA book that has some paranormal elements to it. So I should be keeping busy for the next little while!

Not too busy to visit the Riskies, we hope!!

Be sure and comment on the post to win a signed ARC of Seduced by a Spy. And don't miss any of our upcoming visitors and special events--sign up for our newsletter at riskies@yahoo.com!

Fashion Frenzy!

Warning: Completely frivolous, totally useless, and pictures-heavy post ahead! As you know, last week was the annual Oscars telecast. As usual, the program was long and snoozy, the winners (mostly) predictable (except for Marion Cotillard, Best Documentary, and Best Costumes), and more montages than one person should sit through. But there were gowns. Good ones, bad ones, in-between ones. Lots of black, red, and strapless. And, as usual, I have opinions on them all!

Some of my Likes:

Anne Hathaway (I didn't like that big black bow she did last year at all, but she made up for it this year! This Marchesa gown was stunning, probably my favorite look of the evening)

Marion Cotillard (I was on the fence about this one for a while, but decided I do like it! It's grown on me. Maybe I expected too much from her in the beginning, since she's French...)









Other likes include Penelope Cruz's black strapless gown (of all the black strapless gowns there, hers was the best!); Amy Adams's dark green Proenza Schouler; and Helen Mirren (second best red gown of the night--the sleeves really sparkled under the stage lights)


Some of my Dislikes:


Jennifer Hudson (I've seen pics of her at other events where she looks great, yet she can't seem to dress for the Oscars! It's better than last year's, I guess)










Julie Christie (the sheer sleeves and frumpy length--ugh!)
Also disliked Diablo Cody's "Tarzan and Jane dress up" thing; Ellen Page (not so much dislike as think "meh"--she is so young and pretty, yet the dress was shapeless and dull. Miley Cyrus actually looked much like I hoped EP would); and Daniel Day-Lewis's wife (he wasn't all that great, either).

Now let's talk about Tilda Swinton (because you knew I would!) I like it. Now let's be clear--I do not like the dress. It's undeniable that it resembles nothing so much as a big Hefty bag, and I've never been fond of the one-big-sleeve thing. But I love Tilda Swinton. She is gorgeous, she's a great actress (I can't think of anyone else who could have pulled off Orlando!), and she's just the essence of Eccentric British Aristocrat for the 21st century. She just lives on a different planet than the rest of us, The Planet of Extreme Coolness, and I would have been disappointed if she showed up styled to the gills by Rachel Zoe.



I was also very happy that Elizabeth: The Golden Age won for Best Costume Design (though I did not predict it! I thought The Green Dress would prevail). Much deserved.



And, for your consideration, a few looks for the Oscars of 200+ years ago:




















What would you wear to the Oscars? And what were some of your own likes/dislikes this year??

Happy Saturday!
 
2005-2008 © Risky Regencies
Designed by Enchanted Web Style