Winter activities


The other morning I walked outside and it smelled like spring--damp and mild. Of course it was Mother Nature fooling around, but it has seemed recently, with the slightly longer days, that spring is on its way. So I started thinking about activities that might make spring seem a little nearer.

For the gardeners among us, the catalogues start arriving, to be seized with damp sticky fingers and fondled and pondered. That got me thinking about food--oh, to be honest, when am I not thinking about food--and so I thought I'd check out what was available in the Regency kitchen garden at this time of year. According to Samuel and Sarah Adams, you could have beetroot, broccoli, cabbage plants (as opposed to cabbage, best in May and all summer, and if someone would like to explain that, please do), celery, endive, leeks, parsley, parsnips, potatoes, and spinach (The Complete Servant, 1825). Not too bad--of course availability of many vegetables would depend on what the weather was like and how deep the ground was frozen--England was emerging from a minor ice age (hence the Frost Fair on the frozen Thames in 1814).

The Adamses don't mention tomatoes at all at any time of the year, because the fruit/veg, whatever it is, was regarded with some suspicion in England. Allegedly, Hannah Glass's cookbook of 1758 included a tomato recipe but until the end of the century cooks used them sparingly and mostly for flavoring soups. After all, the plant looked suspiciously like deadly nightshade. Others thought tomatoes might be aphrodisiacs, and the French referred to them as pomme d'amour (love apple). Italians, who adopted the new world oddity with enthusiasm, called them pomi d'oro (golden apple, suggesting that the first varieties to make it to Europe may have been yellow tomatoes).

This gorgeous illustration is of the African tomato from Basil Besler's Hortus Eystettensis (1613)--you can see more of the prints from the work here.

What are you doing to prepare for spring? Are you dreaming of tomatoes or daffodils or beaches?

Roughing it

Right now I’m deep in researching the details of my army brat hero’s background and one of my absolute favorite references is Life in Wellington's Army by Antony Brett-James. It’s just full of the sort of detail that is missed in most history books, much of it gathered from journals and letters of soldiers and officers.

Life in Wellington’s army was no picnic. Read on if you are not too faint of heart…or stomach.

Consider this letter from Charles Napier to his mother: “We are on biscuits full of maggots, and though not a bad soldier, hang me if I can relish maggots.”














Or the story of biscuits (of American make) that were so hard and thick that Lieutenant Wyndham Madden of the 43rd Light Infantry suggested they could turn a bullet aside as he put one in his jacket. “Never was prediction more completely verified,” a fellow officer wrote, “for early in the day the biscuit was shattered to pieces, turning the direction of the bullet from as gallant and true a heart as ever beat under a British uniform.”

(The illustration is "Half Rations" from The Military Adventures of Johnny Newcombe by Rowlandson.)











As for living conditions, when they were not billeted in some village or other, the men often had to sleep in the open. Sometimes they used makeshift tents. In 1813 tents were made general issue but were only a marginal improvement. With twenty soldiers to one tent, it meant, according to Sergeant Cooper, that “none could turn without general consent, and the word ‘turn’ given.” Moreover, in the wintry conditions in the Pyrenees, “mountain gusts and drenching rain tore the wooden pegs out of the mud and left the soldiers to flounder in horrible, enveloping wet folds of canvas.” Brrrr!

(Sketch from The Wheatley Diary.)

I was raised doing all sorts of camping, spending weeks with my family hiking in the Adirondacks or canoeing in the Canadian wilderness. At least we had modern, reasonably waterproof tents. And of course, no maggot-ridden biscuits--although I learned to love Spam while camping. I don’t know how it is—I’ve since tried it at home and found it disgusting!—but frying it over an open fire makes it crispy, salty and delicious beyond words.

Much as I cherish the memory of those family camping trips, now I am married to a man whose idea of roughing it is staying at Day’s Inn rather than Marriott. I still like to hike and canoe, but now our "camping" involves something more like this. Even I have to admit there's something to be said for modern plumbing!

So how about you? What have been your experiences in "roughing it"? Did you enjoy it? Or would you rather just read about it?

Elena
www.elenagreene.com

JANE AUSTEN MOVIE CLUB: Mansfield Park (2007)

Welcome to another "meeting" of the Jane Austen Movie Club! This is where like-minded folk gather to discuss, debate, and dissect every adaptation of Jane Austen that we can get our hands on.

Today we're talking about the new adaptation of Mansfield Park.

To aid the discussion, here are the major credits, with a few notes on some of the people involved.



DIRECTOR: Iain B. MacDonald

SCREENPLAY: Maggie Wadey


Maggie Wadey wrote the screenplay for the 1986 (creepy Tilney) adaptation of Northanger Abbey! She also wrote the 1991 Adam Bede and the 1995 Buccaneers.


CAST:

Douglas Hodge -- Sir Thomas Bertram

Maggie O'Neill -- Mrs. Norris

Jemma Redgrave -- Lady Bertram

In case anyone was wondering exactly what the relationships are, Jemma Redgrave is the daughter of Corin Redgrave (who played Sir Walter Elliot in the 1995 Persuasion), the niece of Lynn Redgrave and Vanessa Redgrave, and cousin to Natasha and Joely Richardson.

Billie Piper -- Fanny Price

Billie Piper, of course, is famous for Doctor Who. She also played Sally Lockhart in the adaptation of the Victorian-set Philip Pullman novel The Ruby in the Smoke, and its sequel, The Shadow in the North (which also featured Northanger Abbey's J J Feild).

Blake Ritson -- Edmund Bertram

Does Blake Ritson look familiar? He played Cedric Diggory in Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire.

Catherine Steadman -- Julia Bertram

James D'Arcy -- Tom Bertram

James D'Arcy is certainly a familiar face -- he was First Lieutenant Tom Pullings in Master and Commander, Blifil in the 1997 Tom Jones, and Nicholas Nickleby in the 2001 adaptation of the same name.

Michelle Ryan -- Maria Bertram

Michelle Ryan, in case you didn't recognize her face from a million adverts and billboards, is the new Bionic Woman.

Rory Kinnear -- Rushworth

Joseph Morgan -- William Price

Joseph Morgan has played a sailor before -- though his previous character had a less happy outcome. His William Warley, captain of the mizzen-top, didn't end well in Master and Commander.

Hayley Atwell -- Mary Crawford

Hayley Atwell played alongside Billie Piper in The Ruby in the Smoke and The Shadow in the North.

Joseph Beattie -- Henry Crawford



So...what did you think???

All comments welcome!

Cara
Cara King, who will give a puppy from Pug's next litter to whoever can say what country dances they were doing

An Awful Crush

I have virtually nothing to say today, so I opened one of my (newly rebound)Annual Registers and found this account from June 27, 1811, about what happened when the Prince Regent opened Carlton House to the public to tour the interior. I'm abridging it greatly!

Yesterday being the last day that the public were permitted to view the interior of Carlton-House, the crowd from an early hour in the morning was immense; and as the day advanced, the scene excited additional interest....The gates were only opened at certain intervals and when this was the case, the torrent was to rapid, that many people were taken off their feet, some with their backs toward the entrance, screaming to get out....Lord Yarmouth and the Duke of Gloucester appeared, and announced to the public, that the gates would not be again opened...this, however, had not the desired effect....Those behind irresitstibly pushed on those before, and of the number of delicate and helpless females who were present, some were thrown down, and shocking to relate, literally trod on by those behind without the possibility of being extricated. When at last the crowd got inside of Carlton-House gates, four females were found in a state of insensibility, lying on their backs on the ground, with their clothes almost completely torn off. One young lady, elegantly attired, or rather who had been so, presented a shocking spectacle; she had been trodden on until her face was quite black from strangulation, and every part of her body bruised to such a degree, as to leave little hopes of her recovery: surgical assistance was immediately had, but her life was not expected to be saved. An elderly lady had her leg broken, and was carried away in a chair; and two others were also seriously hurt, but on being bled, were restored to animation....The situation of almost all the ladies who were involved in this terrible rush was truly deplorable; very few of them could leave Carlton-House until furnished with a fresh supply of clothes; they were to be seen all round the gardens, most of them without shoes or gowns; and many almost completely undressed, and their hair hanging about their shoulders....

Can you imagine it?

Now there's an exciting scene for one of our books.

Have you ever been in such a crowd where you feared being trampled? I've been at exhibits that were so crowded you couldn't see what you came to see, but this Carlton-House visit was literally a crush!

Hope you all have a splendid week and that no one trods on you.

Schedule for Jane Austen Movie Club

Just a reminder of the schedule for our "Jane Austen Movie Club" -- where we meet online to discuss adaptations of Jane Austen's works!

(And the occasional Film Of Interest To Austen Junkies.)

All meetings are on Tuesdays.

We always meet the first Tuesday of every month -- plus, we have extra meetings when called for (and PBS's Complete Jane Austen certainly calls for it!)

SCHEDULE

January 29: the new MANSFIELD PARK

February 5: MISS AUSTEN REGRETS

March 3: 1940 PRIDE AND PREJUDICE (Greer Garson & Laurence Olivier)

April 1: first half of the new SENSE AND SENSIBILITY

April 8: the rest of the new SENSE AND SENSIBILITY


And if you would like to participate in some of our previous discussions, it's not too late! Just click on the link at the bottom of this post that says "Jane Austen Movie Club," and you'll see all of our discussions.

As always, we'd love to hear your opinion!

Cara

A Night at the Opera 1790

So, in the news this week--the Oscar nominations! The nods for Best Costume Design are:

Atonement

La Vie en Rose

Across the Universe

Elizabeth: The Golden Age

Sweeney Todd
The only one that really surprised me was Across the Universe. I might have guessed Becoming Jane or maybe Pirates of the Caribbean 3. My personal pick might be Elizabeth, but my crystal ball says Sweeney Todd. As for the other noms--too close to call. :)



In entertainment news in 1790, there was the premier of Mozart's Cos fan tutte.

According to Henry W. Simon's book Festival of Opera, CFT "has been sung under more names than any other opera in history." For example, the Metropolitan has called it Women Are Like That (the translation I've heard the most often). In England, it was once called Tit for Tat. In Denmark, Flight From the Convent, in France The Chinese Laborer (funny--I don't recall convents or Chinese laborers in the story at all!). And in Germany, lots of different things, such as The Girls' Revenge and The Guerillas.



Under whatever name, it had its premier at Vienna's Burgtheater January 26, 1790, with a libretto by Lorenzo Da Ponte and music by Mozart (the two had also collaborated on Le nozze di Figaro, my personal favorite Mozart opera, and on Don Giovanni.) The source of the story is not known, though there is a (probably apocryphal) tale that it was suggested by Emperor Joseph II based on a high society scandal of the day. Whatever the inspiration, the Emperor did commission the work, requesting a comedy. Mozart was paid 450 guldens for it, and it was nearly his last opera (only La clemenza di Tito and Magic Flute, both 1791, are later).

During the 19th century, the plot was considered rather risque and the opera was rarely performed. It's an ostensibly lighthearted look at the twists and turns of romantic love. It begins in a Naples cafe, where two young men, Ferrando and Guglielmo, argue with Don Alfonso that their fiancees, the sisters Dorabella and Fiordiligi, would never betray them. Aided by Despina, the sisters' saucy maid, the men hatch an elaborate plot to test the womens' loyalty. They disguise themselves as Turkish soldiers and woo each other's girlfriends, eventually winning over the at-first reluctant sisters. In the end, the disguises are revealed, and all is forgiven--though just how happy such marriages can be is anyone's guess.




At the premier, Adriana Ferrarese and Luisa Villeneuve played the sisters; Francesco Bennuci and Vincenzo Calvesi their lovers; Dorotea Bussani was Despina; and Francesco Bussani Don Alfonso.

So, we have News in Entertainment 2008 and 1790! Which movie do you call for Best Costumes (or any other nominee)? Do you have a favorite opera? And Happy Saturday! (I always do love Saturday...)

Death Wish

I came up with the Driving Plot Force of my next book, Road To Desire, and spilled the details to my friend and fellow Regency author, Myretta Robens. Myretta (who is also a celebrity blogger for PBS when they show Pride And Prejudice!) frequently has to listen as I discuss my plot, or what passes for my plot, when I am figuring out a book.

"Your heroes certainly have a death wish, don't they?" she commented. And it's true: My last hero, Alasdair, wanted to take drugs until he expired; this hero knows he will die as a result of An Action he is Determined to Take. In fact, all the heroes I am considering have a dark edge that may or may not result in their death.

Why? I do wear black most of the time, but I'm not a nihilist. I write romance, for goodness' sake! I think it's because I believe in the inexorable saving grace of love--a force so strong it can bring people back from any brink. And what brink is brinkier than death?!?

In pondering the heroes that made me swoon the most, a lot of them had death wishes, or faux death wishes: Heathcliff from Wuthering Heights, Mr. Rochester from Jane Eyre, most (all?) of Anne Stuart's heroes, and I am sure there are others. What makes that kind of single-minded, determined hero so darn attractive to me? Not sure, but I am set on a course for Death Wish heroes for a long time to come (except for the erotic novella I have in my head; the only death is the "little death" he is planning for the heroine. Heh, heh).

Do you find Death Wish heroes attractive? Who are your favorites?

Mad bad and dangerous to know


As the lovely and talented Keira pointed out yesterday, it was Byron's birthday on Tuesday. (I always remember Byron's birthday because it's my father's birthday too--he just turned 97! Younger than Byron, but not by much.)

So happy birthday, Byron, the ultimate bad boy-- mad bad and dangerous to know as the equally mad bad and dangerous Lady Caroline Lamb, defined him. But heck, the man was HAWWWT.

I blogged a little while ago about this excellent book by Jude Morgan about Byron, Shelley, et al, and I urge you to read it--it's fabulous. (And I've just read Symphony by Jude Morgan, about Berlioz and Harriet Smithson, an amazing book. But I'm saving that for another time .) So I thought we'd celebrate Byron's birthday with some of his quotations--many of which I found at this excellent site, not that there's a shortage of sites about Byron. And throw in a few more pics of him.

I awoke one morning and found myself famous.

I have great hopes that we shall love each other all our lives as much as if we had never married at all.


Always laugh when you can. It is cheap medicine.


What men call gallantry, and gods adultery,

Is much more common where the climate's sultry.


The reading or non-reading a book will never keep down a single petticoat.

A woman should never be seen eating or drinking, unless it be lobster salad and Champagne, the only true feminine & becoming viands.


I am about to be married, and am of course in all the misery of a man in pursuit of happiness.

For the sword outwears its sheath,
And the soul wears out the breast,

And the heart must pause for breath,
And love itself have rest.

So share your favorite Byron quote, poem, or anecdote. Or tell us how long it would have taken you to enter into a scandalous and public liaison with him (me: ten minutes).

Learn the latest shocking scandal involving Lord B---- every month via the Riskies newsletter; send an email with NEWSLETTER in the header to riskies@yahoo.com. All contests all the time--enter to win a signed copy of Jane Lockwood's Forbidden Shores in a contest sponsored by Pam Rosenthal ; and you only have a week left to read an alternate ending to The Rules of Gentility and enter to win a prize at janetmullany.com.

How much should we care?

Last week, in a new installment to the Cassie Edwards saga, Paul Tolme spoke out at Newsweek about the experience of having words from his Defenders of Wildlife article on black-footed ferrets used as dialogue in a romance novel. He's clearly delighted that the resulting publicity has caused a spike in donations and ferret adoptions. However, he's also upset some romance readers and writers by his use of terms like "trashy romance novel" and "standard romance-novel schlock", for which he has since apologized.

It brings up the question of how much should we care when people mock the romance genre.

I certainly understand those who feel upset about it. Yet I can't personally blame Paul Tolme. How could he resist such material? And he hasn't exactly had a good introduction to the genre, has he? There are just too many people who share this view of romance (some of them even my relatives and friends). I just don't have the energy to be angry with all of them.

What I do think is that too much righteous indignation can make us look foolish. Maybe we should just enjoy what we read and write and not worry about what people think.

But on the other hand, I've met too many women who might enjoy romance and won't even try one, perhaps for fear of being thought foolish or frivolous. Especially if one of them admits to loving Jane Austen and/or the Brontes, I suspect there are romance novels that might appeal to her. If we managed to somehow tap into that market, it could lead to more sales of the sort of books I want to read and write.

So anyway, I do care and have always paid attention to advice coming through RWA and elsewhere on how to improve the image of the romance genre.

Sometimes we are advised to quote statistics (the ones like romance accounts for 50% of mass market fiction sales). Some people will be impressed by the size of the business even if they don't think they'd care for the product. On the other hand, that can be like telling people they should be impressed with McDonald's food because of the X brazillion burgers sold.

The problem is I don't really feel comfortable trying to defend the entire romance genre. Some books are pretty indefensible. The covers are sometimes cheesy. Sometimes the contents are, too. (There are also some pretty cheesy covers on some wonderful books and vice versa, but that's a whole different blog post.) There is usually some truth to any stereotype.

Anyway, I don't think indignation or a blanket endorsement of the genre are the right responses. If someone is rude (like the teen who walked up to me at a bookstore signing and said "Eeeewwww, romance!") I smile and tell her she is entitled to her opinion. If someone is more polite and seems open-minded, I talk about the variety that exists within the romance genre.

I have occasionally tried to "convert" friends to romance. Not that that is the right word, actually. I wouldn't want someone to try to convert me to reading horror, for instance. (Nothing against horror, I enjoyed the one Stephen King novel I read. But it's just not my favorite flavor.) What I'd really like to do is to get more people to try romance.

Last year, I got Julia Ross's THE WICKED LOVER onto my book group's reading list. I thought her use of language and her characterizations would appeal to them. However, most members didn't read it. It could be in part because it was the December book and everyone was busy (no one read the previous December book either and we've since decided to skip the month). But I don't know if it would have flown in any other month.

I'm at peace with that. I can't change the world and I did get one member into romance. She started out with Julia Ross but has moved on to many new authors. I'm happy about that small gain and I'll continue recommending good romance novels--especially those by the Riskies. :)

So how do you feel when people diss romance? Do you think it matters? What do you do about it?

Elena
www.elenagreene.com

JANE AUSTEN MOVIE CLUB: Northanger Abbey (2007)

Welcome to another special "meeting" of the Risky Regencies Jane Austen Movie Club!

Today we're discussing the newest version of Northanger Abbey, which aired this Sunday in the US, and last spring in the UK.

We discussed the new Persuasion last Tuesday -- and if you missed the discussion, it's not too late to stop by and add a comment! Opinions on it were mixed, but with few raves, and a fair amount of disappointment (particularly about the run and the kiss at the end).

I suspect, however, that opinions on Northanger Abbey may be a bit different! Can't wait to hear what you all thought of it...

Here are a few pieces of information I found interesting:

This Northanger Abbey was filmed entirely in Ireland.

And, not surprisingly, a lot of the cast are Irish actors doing English accents.

The screenplay is by Andrew Davies, who also scripted the upcoming BBC version of Sense and Sensibility, which will air in the US on March 30 and April 6.

Davies is, of course, the screenwriter for the 1995 Pride and Prejudice (the one with Jennifer Ehle and Colin Firth) and the 1996 Emma (which starred Kate Beckinsale), both of which will be shown on PBS as part of their "Complete Jane Austen." He also did the screenplays for Bridget Jones's Diary, the 1994 Middlemarch, the 1998 miniseries of Vanity Fair, the 2002 Daniel Deronda, and the 2005 Bleak House.

According to imdb.com, Northanger Abbey was played by Lismore Castle, in County Waterford, Ireland.


To aid discussion, here are some of the major credits:

CAST:

Catherine Morland: Felicity Jones

The Voice of Jane Austen: Geraldine James

Mrs. Morland: Julia Dearden

Mr. Morland: Gerry O'Brien

James Morland: Hugh O'Connor

Mr. Allen: Desmond Barrit

Mrs. Allen: Sylvestra Le Touzel

Sylvestra Le Touzel is a Jane Austen veteran, having played Fanny Price in the 1983 BBC miniseries of Mansfield Park. She was also seen as Marianne Thornton in 2006's Amazing Grace.

Henry Tilney: JJ Feild

John Thorpe: William Beck

Mrs. Thorpe: Bernadette McKenna

Eleanor Tilney: Catherine Walker

General Tilney: Liam Cunningham

Capt. Frederick Tilney: Mark Dymond

Isabella Thorpe: Carey Mulligan

Carey Mulligan is no stranger to Austen either, having played Kitty Bennet in the 2005 film of Pride and Prejudice. She was also young Ada in the 2005 miniseries of Bleak House.



SCREENPLAY: Andrew Davies

DIRECTOR: Jon Jones


So....what did you think???

All opinions welcome!

Cara
Cara King, who danced Catherine & Tilney's dance last Saturday at the annual Jane Austen Ball!

Rebinding Old Books

Remember me mentioning my Annual Registers? Annual Registers were compilations of important information of the previous year: world events, politics, news stories, births, deaths, marriages, promotions, even poetry sometimes. I wrote a bit more about them at History Hoydens last week.

When we both were very new Regency authors, my friend Kathryn Caskie called me to say that an antiquarian bookseller had several Annual Registers he was willing to sell, enough for each of us to have a complete set of 1810 to 1820. Was I interested? Was I!!! He sold them for $20 each, which was a bargain for us and a steal for him, because they were in such bad shape he probably would have thrown them away.

Here's what they looked like, covers falling off, binding torn or missing, tape holding them together:
I priced rebinding, but it was much too expensive and I couldn't justify spending more money on these books. They were usable and that was enough for me.

Then my husband's friend came to visit. He's a printer, which I always knew, but I didn't know he was also a bookbinder! He had an old binding device and materials which he gave me with instructions on how to rebind my books!

Today I mustered the courage to give it a try. Here's how I did it.

Step 1. I gathered the materials. (This is my dining room)








Step 2. I removed the old binding (I'm going to use that rolling pin)








Step 3. Next I lined up the cardboard.








Step 4. Then I glued it down and used the rolling pin to press it down and force out all the air bubbles. (This is my second try, using black cardboard)








Step 5. I glued on the inside lining and positioned the binding glue strip.








Step 6. I then placed the pages in the new binding and put it in the machine.











Finished!








I'm a little sad to let the old binding go, especially on the books that have the least damage, but now I'll be able to handle the books without them falling apart and crumbling in my hands and without the pages coming loose.

Have you ever rebound books? Or have you ever taken a chance on doing any kind of craft that you never did before?

(I can't wait until tomorrow and Cara's discussion of Northanger Abbey!)

.

Prom Night!


I don't watch many reality TV shows. I've never gotten sucked into Survivor or American Idol or The Bachelor, but when I do find one I like I tend to get a wee bit obsessed. And the two I love are Dancing With the Stars (sadly not on right now!) and Project Runway. Last week's episode was wondrously fabulous! It involved making prom dresses for picky 17 year olds! Woo hoo!

I didn't agree with the winner or the loser of that challenge, but that was beside the point (though I have to say, honestly Christian, what were you thinking??). The point was designing a beautiful dress that was also age-appropriate, and also pleasing and flattering to the client (even if the client was a bit of a looney). It made me think of my own prom dress, and the terrible angst involved in shopping for it, and finding the right shoes and jewelry and hairdo. And the great joy of talking it over with all my friends every day for a month before the Big Night! (The talking and shopping were actually more fun than the actual prom itself, but that's another story...)

It made me wonder what was out there for today's Prom Girl, so I did a Google search for 'prom dresses.' Here are a few I found, along with various historical figures who might have worn them.


Catherine the Great

Emma Hamilton

Isabella of Spain

Marie Antoinette

Caroline Lamb

Elizabeth I

This one I'm not sure about--who do you think would wear it?

What was your prom like? Did you get your dream dress/date? What would you wear if you were going to prom now???

The Power Of The Internet

Elena blogged about the Cassie Edwards situation earlier this week; the whole kerfuffle came to light because of the internet: The Smart Bitches discussed their opinion of Ms. Edwards' body of work, someone wondered just why it was the way it was, they did some googling, and voila, accusations of plagiarism ensue. It seems quite clear that it would not have happened without the internet. Who would have found those old books and compared them if it meant hours and hours in dusty libraries?

Your opinion of what Ms. Edwards may or may not have done aside, I think this situation, this possibility, is a good thing--transparency of information is fabulous, whether I'm searching for a butternut squash recipe, or want to see 1814 walking gowns, or a Biblical quote for my vicar's daughter to spout during an argument with the hero.

The internet is also an incredible word-of-mouth vessel. For example, a blog-friend, Kristie, has been on a Crusade to get people to watch the BBC version of Elizabeth Gaskell's North & South. I had heard of it from an offline writing friend, but hadn't gotten around to watching it, especially since my local library didn't have it. Thanks to Kristie, who lit a fire under my posterior, I got it from the New York Public Library and watched it this week.

I have to say, thank goodness for the internet. I wouldn't have known about the splendor of North & South, and the compellingly dark charisma of the hero, played by Richard Armitage, without it. Any fan of romance, and history, and alpha-sexy Mr. Broody-Pants-type heroes should try to see it.

In other 'What has the Internet Done For Me?' testify stories, my husband and I are renovating a house right now (fingers crossed: March 1), and we've done TONS of research on the web: Paints, stoves, refrigerators, lighting, building codes, etc. Would we even have a clue about anything without it? Unlikely. Not unless we wanted to spend tons of money on reference books or loads of hours in that same dusty libraries.

I find recommendations for books, food, movies, foxy guys, connect with friends, meet new friends (hi, Kristie! hi, Cindy!), introduce myself and my writing to potential readers, and have made some lasting connections that have escalated beyond the keyboard (hi, Myretta! hi, Tracy!).

And, of course, without the Internet we wouldn't all be gathered here, sharing a love of Regency romances.

What do you love most about the web?

My yearly rant and more of the same...

One of our best-known newspapers wants to do a story for St. Valentine's Day on romance writers' bedrooms. Now it is for the Home section, but even so...read the whole entertaining mess at Smart Bitches.

Why do romance writers (and by implication their readers) suffer so in the media? Why are these stereotypes still around? Can we really keep blaming this pink old lady and her dogs? [insert mental pic of Barbara Cartland and her Pekinese here, because Blogger will not let me do the real thing. Thanks]

Here's my theory. It's the cult of the storyteller. This is why I find the Cassie Edwards/plagiarism case is so richly ironic. It didn't matter that Ms. Edwards's style left something to be desired (to put it mildly) because she was a storyteller. She could spin a tale, tell a story--actually that was debatable--but a lot of people thought so. Somewhere, somehow, a divide developed between those who cared about words and language and those who thought the story mattered the most, when in fact one carries the other.

And now suddenly the words do matter in romance. Unfortunately, they matter because the words in question belonged to someone else.

[mentally insert a fab fairy story illustration here.] The honorable, pre-literate craft of the storyteller relies on the linking catch-phrases--

a year and a day
once upon a time
as I walked out one midsummer morning

they lived happily ever after--

that blend the familiar to the new and unexpected. The mass-market storyteller is allowed, if not encouraged by the industry, to rely on a certain amount of repetition and same-ness; but because storytelling is not a special gather round the fire and eat some more of the mammoth Ug caught occasion, that may result in cliche, staleness, sameness.

So what does this have to do with the lady in pink with the fluffy dogs and diamonds? Why doesn't romance get respect? It's not because romance writers are storytellers vs. wordsmiths, or whatever terms you want to use, it's that romance keeps the divide wide and deep by its insistence that the story is the most important thing, and the only important thing. It is in fact rather like this post where I can't put the pix in because Blogger is having a bad hair day or something. You know they should be there but they're not. We know that romance is such a huge market that you can have all sorts of romances and all sorts of writing, but sadly the cliches about the genre and its creators prevail.

It's a pity it took a drastic case of plagiarism for us to be reminded that the words are important too.

TWO Winners!


Due to a mixup we actually have announced two winners for HER WARRIOR KING by Michelle Willingham.

Tracey and Santa, you lucky ducks, please email us at riskies@yahoo.com to claim your prizes.

And we thank Michelle for being so gracious about our little snafu!

Giving credit

Like many writers, I've been following the recent news about Cassie Edwards, historical romance author whose works contain many passages that are strikingly similar to those in various published works. The list includes but is not limited to nonfiction books about Native Americans, an article about black-footed ferrets in Defenders of Wildlife magazine and the 1930 Pulitzer Prize winning novel, Laughing Boy by Oliver La Farge. You can read a summary of the story at The New York Times or read in detail at Smart Bitches Who Love Trashy Books, the blog which originally identified the issue.

I don't want to discuss the specifics of this case or whether these examples constitute plagiarism. You can read the side by side excerpts for yourself at Smart Bitches and join in the discussion there. (You can also read about the authors of Edwards's sources at Dear Author.)

What I'd like to talk about here at the Riskies are some of the issues raised during the ensuing discussion.

A number of people have made statements to the effect that if only Cassie Edwards had acknowledged her sources, everything would be OK. I think they are missing the point. As historical novelists we are supposed to do the research then weave the things we've learned into our stories through our characters' POV and in our own author voices. IN OUR OWN WORDS.

Some bloggers are suggesting novelists should include footnotes and bibliographies. I actually agree with Signet's statement that such things are not required in popular fiction the way they are in academic works. The point, again, is that in popular fiction we shouldn't be copying anything. At most we might use a brief quote (attributed) to establish the tone at the beginning of a chapter, or have a character quote some period poetry or read a headline (again, this can be attributed right within the text).

Footnotes in romance? I don't know how well it works but I can't help thinking it would yank me as a reader right out of the story. I can't help picturing a sexy scene in which the hero is removing the heroine's corset, with a footnote to the effect that "description of heroine's undergarments based on THE HISTORY OF UNDERCLOTHES by C. Willet and Phillis Cunnington". :)

Actually, I've seen a footnote in a romance, just once. A Loretta Chase book had a footnote cross-referencing another of her books in the same series. I don't doubt it was some marketing person's idea. Loretta Chase writes so well I can't imagine her wanting to distract the reader with such a thing.

I've also heard that Susan Johnson uses footnotes for historical information in her novels. I haven't read any of her work so I can't comment on how well those footnotes would work for me. Some of her fans say they enjoy them.

History Geek that I am, I do love Author's Notes that clarify which parts of a book are based on historical fact and list sources for further reading. I wrote such an Author's Note in LADY DEARING'S MASQUERADE, listing CORAM'S CHILDREN by Ruth K. McClure as my source for details of London's Foundling Hospital. For my current mess-in-progress, I'm likely to credit some of my sources for the Napoleonic Wars and the history of ballooning.

But to list every reference I use to create my Regencies? Nah. I've read so many books on the Regency, many of which cover similar ground, that by now I couldn't say whether I gleaned well-known facts about the Regency from Carolly Erickson's OUR TEMPTESTUOUS DAY or THE AGE OF ELEGANCE by Sir Arthur Bryant or a number of other histories of the period.

Thinking about it further, I do give credit to all my references in one way. Within the Beau Monde (RWA's Regency chapter) we share an annotated bibliography called the Regency Realm. By now it has over 1000 entries for books, magazines and other sources we all use to create our stories. I know this because I'm the one who maintains it.

Anyway, do you think novelists have an obligation to credit all their sources and how? What do you think of the idea of footnotes in fiction? Bibliographies? Author's Notes?

And before we start discussing this, a gentle caution that we keep the discussion polite. On other blogs discussion has occasionally crossed the line into personal attacks on individuals involved. I know most (probably all) of us know better but just had to say it anyway.

Elena
www.elenagreene.com

JANE AUSTEN MOVIE CLUB: Persuasion (2007)

Welcome to a special meeting of Risky Regencies' Jane Austen Movie Club!

Today we're discussing the newest adaptation of Persuasion, which aired in the US this past Sunday on PBS, and in the UK last year.

First, here's some Knowledge to Impress your Friends With: contrary to what some people assume, this Persuasion is not a BBC production. The upcoming new Sense and Sensibility is BBC, but the other three new adaptations (Persuasion, Northanger Abbey, and Mansfield Park) are ITV.

Or actually, to be quite correct: this Persuasion was produced by Clerkenwell Films and WGBH, and distributed by ITV and PBS. :-)

Now that that sticky mess is out of the way, please turn off your cell phones and pagers, place your tray tables in their upright position, and tell us what you thought of the new Persuasion!

(By the way, here's an interview with Sally Hawkins, the new Anne Elliot. A rather ordinary interview, in my opinion, but see what you think.)

To aid discussion, here's a cast list and some of the other major credits. As I love noticing folks who've worked on other historical adaptations, I've put some "you've seen him in this" tidbits in purple.

Director: Adrian Shergold

Screenplay: Simon Burke

Burke's screenwriting credits include the 1997 miniseries of Tom Jones and some of the Cadfael series.

CAST:

Sally Hawkins -- Anne Elliot

Hawkins played Mary Shelley in the 2003 TV Byron which starred Jonny Lee Miller.

Anthony Head -- Sir Walter Elliot

Julia Davis -- Elizabeth Elliot

Amanda Hale -- Mary Musgrove

Rupert Penry-Jones -- Captain Wentworth

Penry-Jones played St John Rivers in the Samantha Morton/Ciaran Hinds Jane Eyre.

Alice Krige -- Lady Russell

Krige played Mary Shelley in 1988's Haunted Summer, and the beautiful marquesa in Sharpe's Honour.

Michael Fenton Stevens -- Mr. Shepherd

Mary Stockley -- Mrs. Clay

Peter Wight -- Admiral Croft

Wight played Mr. Gardiner in the 2005 (Keira Knightley) Pride and Prejudice.

Marion Bailey -- Mrs. Croft

Jennifer Higham -- Louisa Musgrove

Rosamund Stephen -- Henrietta Musgrove

Stephen played Miss de Bourgh in the 2005 Pride and Prejudice.

Stella Gonet -- Mrs. Musgrove

Sam Hazeldine -- Charles Musgrove

Nicholas Farrell -- Mr. Musgrove

Farrell played Fenner in Sharpe’s Regiment, Edmund Bertram in the 1983 BBC Mansfield Park, and Henry Thornton in Amazing Grace.


Joseph Mawle -- Captain Harville

Finlay Robertson -- James Benwick

Tobias Menzies -- William Elliot

Maisie Dimbleby -- Mrs. Smith

Sarah Buckland -- Nurse Rooke


So, what did you think???

All opinions welcome! (Though do be polite!)

And be sure to stop by here on the next two Tuesdays, when we'll be discussing the new Northanger Abbey and Mansfield Park!

Cara
Cara King, who reads and writes books, and would sleep on them too if she were a cat

Tooting My Own Horn

Do you all mind if I toot my own horn? I really really really want to share this with our Risky friends.

One of the things (many? most? all?) authors do when their books are released is to wait for the reviews. With The Vanishing Viscountess, I'm no exception, especially because the early review from Romantic Times BOOKreviews was only lukewarm:



In this spin-off of Innocence and Impropriety, Gaston pens a
nicelywritten, albeit standard, hero-rescues-heroine scenario. With its
sensualityand some nice touches of emotional intensity, this is a pleasant
andentertaining story.--Joan Hammond,

RT

Not a bad review, but I had been hoping for better. Needless to say, I worried about what the other reviews would be. (Picture me biting my nails...)

Next came Cataromance:

Looking for a book with passion, love, action, danger and surprises? Look no further; The Vanishing Viscountess is perfect for you. Diane Gaston will grab your emotion with this one.--Debby G for Cataromance

Yes! But that was only the start.

Romance Reviews Today:


Diane Gaston’s THE VANISHING VISCOUNTESS is a suspense-adventure story wrapped around many of the Regency Romance elements so many of us love. The love that arises between Tanner and Marlena seems both pointless and hopeless when Marlena faces hanging if she is ever captured. Both characters will attract you with their past luggage, current resourcefulness, and their loving care of each other during their trip. There are two sub-plots interwoven with the main characters' travails that add depth and understanding to the situation. These story threads all come together in a perilously climactic ending.--Robin Lee, Romance Reviews Today
Soon to be on Historical Romance Writers, now on Amazon:

In THE MYSTERIOUS MISS M, Diane Gaston showed great poignancy. In THE IMPROPER WIFE, written under the pseudonym Diane Perkins, the author displayed humor and sensitivity. In her latest release, Ms. Gaston decides to try her hand at a road romance and success is THE VANISHING VISCOUNTESS!

This reader has long enjoyed road romance, simply because the hero and heroine spend a significant amount of time together. En route from one locale to another, the couple is forced to work on a relationship through danger and isolation. If done properly, the hero and heroine appear to be the only ones on the page. In THE VANISHING VISCOUNTESS, Diane Gaston sticks to this formula, yet quietly attaches sub-plots and the entire package ties together beautifully.

From any author, my single request may seem selfish, but I want entertainment! In THE VANISHING VISCOUNTESS, Diane Gaston entertained me! --
MaryGrace Meloche on Amazon

(MaryGrace's opinion particularly relieved me, because she thought the story succeeded where the RT reviewer had been unimpressed)

And finally Rakehell:

Diane Gaston a
marvelous author spinning a tale of drama, intrigue, secrecy and
love in The Vanishing Vicountess. The first chapter of most books sets
the
scene, introduces you to various characters, surroundings and etc. This book
hits you like a pugilist and knocks your directly into round four with a
shipwreck, a heavy conscience, loneliness, lies, mystery, and regret. Let us
not
forget the fateful coup de foudre - love at first sight; and all
by page
18. The Vanishing Vicountess far surpassed my expectations
and surprised
me by touching me when I least expected it – right from the
start....

This is a beautiful story. It has all of the elements you hope for in a romance. From the first page to the last the story wraps itself around you like a warm blanket encouraging you to trust it just enough to warm you even when you have that brief cold moment of doubt. I would absolutely recommend this book to anyone who loves a good historical regency novel or to anyone who loves a bit of a lusty drama and the triumph of the underdog. I know I do! This is the first Diane Gaston novel I've read, but it certainly won't be my last.-- Christine Shoup, Rakehell


Whoo hoo!

Maybe even more gratifying were the reader reviews from
Amazon and Barnes & Noble.

To Romance Lover "RL" and Judy T on Amazon, and MK, JT, and MP/A Reader, Diane Gaston Fan, on Barnes & Noble, my heartfelt thanks for taking the time to write about The Vanishing Viscountess.

These are the sorts of things a writer hopes to hear about her work.

My great thanks to all the reviewers for getting the word out to readers about all our books. It is so very gratifying to receive great reviews, but I must say I appreciate all reviewers and readers who put their opinions "out there" for all to see.

Now the big question. Do you listen to reviews? Do they influence you?

(and I can't wait until tomorrow, when Cara discusses the PBS/BBC Persuasion!)


.





The Riskies Welcome Back Michelle Willingham!

1) Tell us about Her Warrior King!

Her Warrior King
was technically the first book in the MacEgan Brothers series. When I first wrote it, the book had some serious flaws and didn't sell. I put it aside and wrote Her Irish Warrior which did sell. I had also written The Warrior's Touch in the meantime, and with both of those books coming out, I wanted to resurrect Her Warrior King.

I polished the first three chapters, dumped the rest of the book, and started over. It was truly a hard book to write because I had to let go of my previous version and start fresh.

The hero, Patrick MacEgan, is a king struggling to rebuild his Irish tribe after they were defeated by Normans. The price of their lives was an alliance with a Norman bride. Patrick agrees to wed Isabel de Godred, but he refuses to let his bride play any part in their lives. But what he doesn't count on is Isabel's idealism and desire to be a true wife. She's stubborn, spunky, and is not about to let her Irish husband isolate her upon an island. She does everything she can to help their tribe, trying desperately to fit in. But the tribe won't have anything to do with her. Patrick begins to sympathize with her efforts, and slowly Isabel conquers his heart. Then Patrick is faced with having to choose between his people and the wife he has come to love.

I loved these characters, and Isabel kept surprising me with things she did to make her place among the tribe.

I think the most startling scene, for me, was when she couldn't find a boat to escape the island and she swam across the channel!

2) How does this fit with your previous releases?

It's being released as a prequel, and it's technically book 1 in the series. I would have liked to have the books come out in chronological order, but the original version had too many flaws to be published first. It's not necessary to read the books in any particular order, but I'm glad that all three stories will be told. For readers who wanted to hear about the story of Patrick and Isabel, they finally can learn what happened.

3) Did you come across anything interesting in your research for Her Warrior King?

At first, I had made Patrick's rank a chieftain, but after consulting with an Irish archaeologist, he pointed out that Patrick commanded too many people to be a chief or chieftain. Instead, he recommended that I make him into a petty king. I was startled to learn how many kings there were in Ireland--hundreds at one point!

Most readers' impression of a king is one person governing a country, but in Ireland, they would elect a High King from all of the provincial kings. Being king wasn't necessarily a birthright, either, although often the previous king's sons were the strongest candidates.

Patrick is a fictional provincial king from an imaginary kingdom not far from Waterford. This was where the Norman invasion took place in real life.

4) Your settings are so well-drawn! What is it about medieval Ireland that makes you want to set your books there?

Anyone who has ever visited Ireland knows that the country has a mystical sense of folklore and romance. When I visited some of the ancient ruins, I could imagine sexy Irish warriors riding through the grounds.

Scottish heroes are always popular, and I wanted to put my own spin on Celtic heroes. Medieval Ireland seemed to be an untapped wellspring, and then I had a great excuse to return to the country last year, to continue the research.

5) I know you have three kids AND a teaching job! I think I speak for all writers when I ask--what are your time management secrets???

Early bedtimes! My children aren't aware that other kids don't go to bed at 7:00 p.m. Shh! Don't tell them! I use the night hours to write, but that's been more challenging lately with the birth of my son this November. But I do try to write, edit, or revise every day to keep my head in the story. I love what I do, and it's not truly "work" to me.

6) What's next for you?

I am finishing a book that's set in 1101 AD, tentatively titled SLAVE TO HER DESIRES. It's about a slave who comes to love the woman betrothed to his master. Kieran is a woodworker, and there is a connection to the MacEgans...but readers will have to wait and find out what that is!

Thanks so much, Michelle, for visiting with us again (while your kids are asleep, LOL).

For a chance to win a signed copy of Her Warrior King, comment on this post and watch for tomorrow's announcement of the winner.

To keep track of all visitors at RR, sign up for the newsletter at riskies@yahoo.com!

Star Gazing

What I've been doing this week:

1) Working on the new book. Up to page 56 now! And watching Caribbean vacation shows on the Travel Channel and calling it research. Never mind that the story is set in the 1530s, and it's doubtful there were any all-inclusive resorts with cabanas and unlimited mango margaritas, it's the atmosphere I'm after.

2) Deciding what books to order to celebrate my birthday, which is on Tuesday! Mango margaritas all around!

3) Mourning the loss of the Golden Globe awards. No gowns! No jewels! No hilarious tipsy acceptance speeches! January will be blah indeed.



4) Watching the DVDs of the BBC series Robin Hood, which I got from Netflix. My North and South DVD needed a rest, so I thought I would give this one a try. So far--interesting. More thoughts later. In the meantime, my friends are sick of me constantly yelling "Mr. Thornton! You are being such a meanie! And wash your hair!" at the TV screen.



And, in case you thought my week was totally wasted, I found out January 12 is the anniversary of the founding of the Royal Astronomical Society.

The RAS's website states that it "...encourages and promotes the study of astronomy, solar system science, geophysics, and closely related branches of science." Anyone over 18 who proves acceptable to the Society can apply for a fellowship even today. It all began at a dinner at the Freemason's Tavern on January 12, 1820, when it was just the Astronomical Society (it received a charter from William IV in 1831). It was formed by mostly "gentlemen astronomers" to support and further their research.

The minutes of this meeting record: "On this day several gentlemen...met together by appointment at the Freemason's Tavern, Great Queen Street, Lincoln's Inn Fields, London, to take into consideration the propriety and expediency of establishing a Society for the management and promotion of astronomy." 14 attended this meeting. The Duke of Somerset was elected president, but resigned a week later. His friend Sir Joseph Banks, president of the Royal Society, thought a new Astronomical Society might drain resources from the RS. William Herschel then became president, with Francis Baily secretary and Daniel Moore chairman.

The second meeting on February 8, at the Geological Society rooms in Bedford Street, Covent Garden, boasted 83 members. The Monthly Notices began publication in 1827 (prior to this reports of their meetings were found in the Philosophical Magazine). It wasn't until 1915 that a Supplemental Charter admitted women to the Society.

So, if we can't see stars on the red carpet, at least we can still see them in the sky! What have you been up to this week?

Looking Forward


A few weeks ago, I blogged about my favorite books of 2007. A bit later, I blogged about New Year's Resolutions, one of which was to reduce the size of the TBR pile. Well, I got a bit of cash for the holidays, and instead of putting it sensibly into my ongoing house renovation, I went a little nuts at Amazon.


So let me share what I am looking forward to in 2008:


Sabrina Jeffries' Let Sleeping Rogues Lie (School for Heiresses)
Lilith Saintcrow's To Hell and Back (Dante Valentine, Book 5)

Julie Anne Long's The Perils of Pleasure
Diane Gaston's The Vanishing Viscountess
Colleen Gleason's The Bleeding Dusk: The Gardella Vampire Chronicles
Meljean Brook's Demon Night (The Guardians, Book 5)


One of my moral imperatives is to purchase books by authors whom I wish to support, despite the proximity of the library and my cash-strapped self (see house renovation, above).

So if an author consistently wows me, I will continue to buy their books. In the years since I've made my commitment, authors have fallen off the list, but I've added more that I've dropped, which is a good thing (except for Lee Child; his books now come out in hardcover, and I don't do hardcover. I'm not that moral).

I am looking forward to plenty of good reading in 2008, and yes, perhaps, a smaller library? (stop chortling, you guys!) What new releases are you looking forward to?

Farewell to Flashman

I was sad to hear that George MacDonald Fraser, creator of the Flashman series and one of the great historical novelists of our time, died a few days ago.

Fraser took a minor character, Flashman the school bully, from the nineteenth-century novel Tom Brown's Schooldays, and elaborated on his later career. Flashman is one of the great literary anti-heroes--quivering in fear, lying and cheating his way out of trouble, and behaving in a thoroughly despicable way (particularly where women are concerned), he manages to become embroiled in just about every military crisis of the nineteenth century. He's a survivor of the Indian mutiny, the battle of Little Bighorn and the charge of the Light Brigade; and he managed to fight on both sides of the American Civil War. Despite his egregious behavior he manages to emerge from each adventure a revered and adored hero.

His many decorations include the Victoria Cross, US Medal of Honor, and San Serafino Order of Purity and Truth, 4th class, and in addition to his military dishonors Flashy was director of the British Opium Co., honorary president of the Mission for Reclamation of Reduced Females, and author of such works as Twixt Cossack and Cannon and The Case Against Army Reform.

Fraser presents his books as Flashy's memoirs, based on original documents discovered in an attic, with Fraser's meticulous footnotes and comments--hilarious stuff and totally devoid of political correctness. Fraser was particularly proud of the fact that in the US, over one third of the reviewers of the first Flashman book thought they were reading genuine memoirs and not meticulously researched and written fiction.

Have you read the Flashman books? What are your favorite moments? One of mine is when Flashy (and I can't remember whether it's shortly before or after he's shot in the backside), meets a young lawyer called Abraham Lincoln and tells him you can't fool all of the people all of the time... And then there's the wagon train going west, that includes an entire New Orleans whorehouse on the move and a wagon of invalids, battling the plains for their health...

Great stuff, all twelve volumes, and I'm sorry Fraser didn't live long enough to finish all the disgraceful episodes of Flashy's long and eventful life.

The Ideal Reader

I recently finished ON WRITING by Stephen King (one down on the TBR list!) and I highly recommend it to fellow writers. I suspect even non-writers might be intrigued by King's insights into the insane business of fiction writing.

For anyone who has not read it, the book has two main elements: memoirs of King's own journey as a writer including the story of his comeback to writing after his horrific accident in 1999, along with practical and entertaining advice on the craft. Both make good reading. His advice on adverbs alone cracked me up:

They're like dandelions. If you have one on your lawn, it looks pretty and unique. If you fail to root it out, however, you find five the next day..fifty the day after that..and then, my brothers and sisters, your lawn is totally, completely and profligately covered with dandelions.

But I've been writing long enough that advice like this is not new. What I did find most useful are his ideas on how to deal with reader reaction and critical feedback.

You can't please all of the readers all of the time; you can't please even some of the readers all of the time, but you really ought to try to please at least some of the readers some of the time.

I ought to print this out and tack it up somewhere in my writing space. Just for those moments when my work gets slammed by a reader on Amazon or on an online review site and I forget that for each online bashing I can show at least 10 positive reviews.

The concept that struck me most in ON WRITING is King's concept of an "ideal reader". He writes:

I think that every novelist has a single ideal reader; that at various points during the composition of a story, the writer is thinking, "I wonder what he/she will think when he/she reads this part?" For me that first reader is my wife, Tabitha.
The Ideal Reader is the personification of your target audience. Someone who enjoys the genre and the type of stories you write, someone who "gets" you at your personal best but is also smart enough to know when you have fallen short.

I don't think I have a single Ideal Reader. My critique partners are great but none of them love the Regency enough that I would write with them in mind. Failing an Ideal Reader, I'm all too prone to let the wrong people into my head when I'm writing: my mother, the nun who taught me in 1st grade, the random wacko on Amazon, the lady who wrote at length to chastise me about all the "pages and pages of explicit sex" in SAVING LORD VERWOOD (though she did say she forced herself to read the whole thing!). Having an Ideal Reader might help.

What would my Ideal Reader be like? She must love the Regency, relish a nice dollop of historical detail along with the romance, not have rigid expectations about whether she wants a sweet or sensual book, and enjoy reading about flawed characters.

Perhaps I am my own Ideal Reader. Pretending I'm writing just for myself often helps me through rough patches. But it is hard to judge my own work while I'm writing it and taking the time to let a manuscript rest is hard given publishing pressures. Thinking of a reader outside myself might be the better way.

Maybe, when I'm driving myself crazy trying to please too many different readers, I should just think about the Riskies and friends here. I'll have to try that next time Mrs. Grundy gets in my head!

My fellow writers, what do you think? Do you write with an Ideal Reader in mind? What is she or he like?

For readers, whose Ideal Reader do you think you might be?

Elena
www.elenagreene.com

New Author Spotlight: Georgie Lee

I thought I'd try something a bit different today -- an offbeat introduction to a new Regency author, shorter and sillier than our formal interviews (er, I mean the introduction, not the author!) and hopefully fun.

Many of you have probably seen Georgie Lee's comments on our blog -- well, her first Regency, Lady's Wager, has just been published by Cerridwen Cotillion, and you all know how I love any sort of Regency gambling! (In this particular wager, if the heroine loses, she has to get married -- and that's always great fun.) So let's get to know Georgie Lee a little better!


So, Georgie, how did you feel when you sold your first book?

Excited, and somewhat terrified. I’ve heard many authors describe their first sale experience but until I went through it, the contract, the edits, the nail biting countdown to release day, I had no idea the trials awaiting me. However, the feelings of accomplishment and pride that came with selling Lady’s Wager made all the other stresses and headaches worth it and I can’t wait to do it again.

What's one big difference between writing for Hollywood, and writing novels?

Well, so far neither has made me rich but there is still time (haa-haa). It was an adjustment moving from screenwriting to novels and it took a while to make the switch. In screenwriting, a writer provides the director with a dialogue blueprint and the end result is someone else’s vision. Writing a novel made me responsible for everything and it took a while to get the hang of scene descriptions and sensory details. My first draft of Lady’s Wager was difficult to read because I hadn’t learned how to move characters through a scene without constantly using the word “and”. However, after a couple of drafts I got the hang of it and my writing greatly improved.

Why do you like writing in the Regency period?

I’ve always loved the manners and the elegance of the Regency. I know those manners covered up what could be a very harsh society but the delight of romances is the ability to enjoy a time period without the ugly reality. Also, writing in the Regency is like being a screenwriter during the golden age of Hollywood. Back then, characters couldn’t always say everything they wanted to say, especially if it was racy. As a result, writers came up with very clever dialogue and scenes to suggest what the characters were forbidden to express.

What's your favorite Jane Austen novel?

Persuasion. Unlike many of Austen’s other characters, such as Emma and Elizabeth, who are self-confident, Anne lacks self-confidence at the beginning and must learn to believe in herself and her opinion. I think we all feel a lack of self-confidence at times and so we can easily identify with Anne. Also, it’s touching to watch her change and grow and to see her growth rewarded with a second chance at love.

Non-Jane Austen Regency Romance?

His Lordship’s Swan by Martha Kirkland. It was one of the first Regencies I read and I love the heroine’s spunk and the way her defiance of convention catches the hero’s attention. I enjoy strong female characters who don’t conform to social expectations and this non-conformist attitude is one of the defining features of Charlotte, the heroine of Lady’s Wager.

What's your favorite period movie?

Where do I begin? I love so many period movies, from Dangerous Beauty to An Ideal Husband, Pride and Prejudice and Sense and Sensibility to Elizabeth. However, my all time favorite is Gone with the Wind. I first saw it in junior high, and Scarlett O’Hara’s determination to succeed combined with her devil may care attitude and her belief in the promise of tomorrow really spoke to me. About ten years ago I was finally able to see it in a theatre and it was like seeing it for the first time.

If you had to marry one Jane Austen hero, which would it be?

Mr. Darcy. In a lot of ways he reminds me of my husband. Both of them are reserved and somewhat shy, which can sometime be mistaken for pride, and both are devoted to those they love.

Thanks for joining us, Georgie! (Okay, you're married to Mr. Darcy...does that mean I have to hate you?) :-)

And if anyone wants to know more about Lady's Wager or about Cotillion Regencies, just go to Cotillion's Georgie Lee page.

And remember to stop by Risky Regencies next Tuesday to discuss the new adaptation of Persuasion! (When any of the new Austens air on PBS, we'll discuss them here the following Tuesday.)

Cara
Cara King, author of her own little gambling book

Winner of The Vanishing Viscountess



The winner of the autographed copy of The Vanishing Viscountess, Mills & Boon 100th birthday edition, is....

Janegeorge!!!

Just send your contact details to riskies@yahoo.com and your prize will soon be on its way...

Monday Morning Ramble

I'm just going to ramble today because you already heard from me yesterday about The Vanishing Viscountess. By the way, I'll pick a winner of the book at midnight tonight.

I'm telling you, you all put me to the blush with the nice things you said yesterday. It made me feel really really good and in a few days, when I'm stuck on whatever project I turn to next, I'm going to try to rememember to reread all your lovely comments. (Either that or start pulling at my hair and rending my garments)

I do hope you go look at my Google Map on my website. If you click on the placemarkers you can see the Road Trip. And if you enlarge the map you can see the placemarkers along the side. It is easier to read.
It was fun making the map so I'm really excited to share it.

Talking about the problems of writing a Road Story in the January Romantic Time BOOKreviews, here yesterday, and on my website led me to thinking a lot about the research I do and how I do it. I will not claim to be an expert at this, but I do have my own way of doing it. I'll be talking about research in various places in the next couple of weeks.

Tomorrow and Wednesday on Romantic Inks where I'll be giving away a copy of Innocence and Impropriety.

January 15 on Romance Vagabonds, those lovely and enthusiastic writers.

I'll also be doing a chat January 15 9 to 10 PM ET at Mystic Castle. Chats always intimidate me because I'm always afraid I'll forget how to get into the chatroom (I always manage). So come ahead of time so you can figure out how to get in, too.

An interview on History Hoydens Jan 15 and more on research Jan 17.

And I'm talking about Research on The Wet Noodle Posse on Jan 10. "How Much to Research Before You Start Your Book."

Speaking of The Wet Noodle Posse (2003 Golden Heart Finalists), we (and this includes our Janet, too, another noodler) are embarking on a year long blogging project, covering all aspects of how to write a romance novel. Here's our promotional blurb and a contest at the end for including this blurb on your blogs and websites.

The Wet Noodle Posse had such a great time with our month of Golden Heart prep that we're giving away writing tips...one month at a time. In addition to book and critique giveaways, join Q&A sessions and read guest blogs from bestselling writers like Sherrilyn Kenyon and Gena Showalter.

Check out our line-up of topics!

January-Getting Started (goals, choosing story idea, focus, etc.)
February-Character Development (names, physical descriptions, backstory, etc.)
March-Plotting
April - Conflict
May-Research
June-Business side of Writing (market, marketing, promotion, etiquette)
July-Prepping for Conference (both for national and smaller conferences)
August-Inspiration (for stories and for keeping yourself going)
September-Writer Health (physical and mental)
October-GH Preparation
November-Writing Challenges (NaNo, BIAW, turning off the internal editor, etc.)
December-Editing/Revisions

Get great information in a fun community! Visit http://wetnoodleposse.blogspot.com/

You can enter to win Barnes and Noble.com gift certificates by posting this news release on your blog or forwarding to a chapter/group e-mail loop or newsletter. To be eligible, e-mail the particulars of your forward/post to jillmonroe@cox.net and post no later than January 20, 2008. A random drawing will determine the winner(s) of the gift certificates.

All this should keep you busy, but don't forget to READ and, if you are one of the writers, to WRITE. I think I'll tear my hair out and rend my garments because I'm not sure I have that much to say about research!!!! Yikes!

If you have a chance to look at my Google Map, let me know what you think! And I'm game for more The Vanishing Viscountess sightings to be reported!

Diane Talks about The Vanishing Viscountesss

Today the Risky Regencies interview one of their own. Diane has a new release, The Vanishing Viscountess, out this month in North America from Harlequin Historical and the UK from Mills & Boon.

Diane will randomly select one lucky commenter to receive a special prize--the Mills & Boon version of The Vanishing Viscountess. Mills & Boon selected The Vanishing Viscountess to be a special release celebrating the 100th birthday of Mills & Boon. This edition has a gold embossed cover, special interview features, and a bonus book---The Mysterious Miss M



The Vanishing Viscountess truly is a beautiful love story. Filled with danger, passion and love. Immediately one is swept away in this exciting road adventure.--MP, Barnes & Noble reader review
1. Diane, welcome to the Risky Regencies interview. Tell us about The Vanishing Viscountess

First of all, thank you so much for having me at your wonderful Risky Regencies blog. I feel right at home here! But let me talk about my book.

The Vanishing Viscountess is the Marquess of Tannerton’s story. Remember Tanner from Innocence and Impropriety? While writing I&I, I made a deal with him. If he stopped trying to take over Flynn and Rose's story, I'd write him a story of his own. I got back at him, though. In Innocence & Impropriety, Tanner depended upon his money, title, and connections to solve all his problems. In his own story, I stripped him of all those trappings and made him survive using his wits and resourcefulness.

I gave Tanner a damsel in distress, a fugitive from the law, the Vanishing Viscountess, Marlena Parronley, unjustly accused of murder and on the run. Tanner rescues her from a shipwreck and insists upon escorting her to safety in Scotland, even though he has very little money and must pretend not to be a marquis. Tanner and Marlena must travel across Great Britain from the Anglesey coast to Edinburgh, Scotland without Tanner’s use of his title, his connections, or his wealth.

And, of course, danger pursues them the whole way.

2. How did you get the idea for this story?

Besides from Tanner himself, whose character was imbedded in my mind, I'd been fascinated by news accounts of real shipwrecks that I'd read in my Annual Registers, a set of books of the time period that are a little like almanacs (I own 1810 to 1820, but they are in terrible shape). The Annual Registers contain summaries of the proceedings of parliament, lists of marriages and births of peers, and month-by-month selection of news stories of the previous year. (You can find an online copy of The Annual Register of 1814 here ).

Sadly in all of the accounts I've read of shipwrecks around the English coast, all the women and children died.

I like to start my books with something exciting if I can and a shipwreck seemed to fit the bill. From Tanner and a shipwreck the rest of the story just grew.

3. What was risky about this story?

This was my first “Road Story” plot. When I conceived the idea for Tanner’s story, I didn’t realize I was writing a Road Story. It meant I had to research many settings, not just one, because the characters travel to a different place almost every day. I also had to come up with a believable route and find realistic places the characters could stop. I had to make certain that I described the terrain in a realistic way. I used Google Maps and Google Earth to help me. I wrote about this for the January 2008 RT. You can also read more about it and find my Google Map on my website here.

Another thing that I think was risky was that my heroine, Marlena, withholds information from Tanner, even as they become lovers. I hope that I gave her sufficient motivation for virtually lying to Tanner. I’ll have to see what readers think.

4. You always tell us that you write about the Regency Underworld, the seamy side of the Regency. How was The Vanishing Viscountess the seamy side when your hero is a Marquis and your heroine a Viscountess?

It is always a challenge to me to include a “Regency Underworld” element to my stories. In The Vanishing Viscountess, I tried to put Tanner and Marlena in situations lords and ladies do not usually face, like surviving a shipwreck, being the victims of wreckers, traveling as ordinary people, having to buy and wear ordinary clothes. I also give readers a glimpse of the seamier side of being a servant in the backstory of the secondary heroine, Fia, who has been coerced into her employer’s bed.

5. What’s next?
My next book is Scandalizing the Ton, scheduled for release in October 2008.

It is my Regency Paparazzi story! I got to wondering what it would be like for a Regency lady to be hounded by the press, like Britney Spears, Lindsay Lohan, or Paris Hilton are today. And what if the Regency lady became pregnant and no one knew who the father of the baby was, like poor Anna Nicole Smith? My heroine, though, has done nothing to bring this media attention onto herself. She only had one brief moment of indiscretion.

Readers briefly met the hero of Scandalizing the Ton in Innocence and Impropriety and he is mentioned in The Vanishing Viscountess. The hero is Tanner’s friend Adrian Pomroy, now Viscount Cavanley, and even he does not know who the father of the baby is....


I couldn't put it down. What a story! It grabs you and doesn't let go. Emotion, love, danger, sensual beautiful love scenes, and realism to the max... who could ask for more? A super-keeper of a book. This is one of Diane's best, and I've read all of them!--MK, Barnes & Noble reader review
I hope you all will put The Vanishing Viscountess on the top of your TBR piles and make it a New Year's resolution to read it. Be sure to let me know what you think of it.

Cheers!

Chapter One, Page One




This week, I started work on a new book (up to page 22 now!). It's the third of what I call my "Renaissance Trilogy," which started with A Notorious Woman and continues with A Sinful Alliance in April (the story of Nicolai Ostrovsky). This 3rd, unnamed book, is Balthazar Grattiano's story, and takes place mostly in the Caribbean in the 1530s. I'm hoping that imagining warm islands and sandy beaches will help me through the cold, gray winter days!



This first part of a book, the first step, Chapter One, is very exciting. All those blank pages--anything can happen! It's also very, very scary. All those blank pages--disaster can happen. Like the first day of a long-planned, much-anticipated vacation. For this book, hopefully I'm fortified by lots of research (including the trip to visit Diane in Virginia last summer!), and by the feeling that I know the characters very well. They'll usually show me where they want to go.

Every writer starts a story in a different way, I'm sure, but mine always seem to start with a character. Sometimes the hero, sometimes the heroine. Then I have to find them a story, a frame, and their right match. These 3 stories happened to start with heroes (2 of them heroes I never intended to write a story for, until they insisted!). But their heroines came to me vividly soon after. In Notorious Woman, there's Marc the ship's captain and Julietta the perfumer, both with secrets to hide; in A Sinful Alliance, Nicolai the actor and spy, and Marguerite--well, she's a spy, too. She tries to kill him in a Venetian brothel, and then they meet again a year later at the court of Henry VIII! Balthazar, the pseudo-villain of ANW, is now seeking to redeem himself in the New World, until he meets tavern owner Bianca, a woman he may have wronged in his misspent youth...



As you can tell, I really like characters with Secrets, with a dark side they must overcome through the power of love and self-realization. I often like characters who are "outsiders" in some way, who march to their own beat despite what society might expect. Characters who are--risky, I guess. Sometimes they're harder to get to know, but they always take me to such interesting places. Both as a writer and a reader. (BTW, Elizabeth Mahon, a frequent RR visitor, has a great blog about such real-life historical "characters" at Scandalous Women)

This particular journey, with these characters, is just starting. Wish me luck.

Who are some of your favorite characters???

Don't forget to join us tomorrow, as Diane launches Vanishing Viscountess (and gives away a copy)! Keep up with all our characters, risky or otherwise, by signing up for our newsletter at riskies@yahoo.com...

Frampton Comes Alive With Resolutions


I am a fool for New Year's Resolutions. I think it's because I have a smidge of OCD (and really, can you have just a smidge?), and I love dates, and numbers, and itemization, and lists.

How could I not love them? A LIST! With THINGS on it!

So this year, as usual, I've got the weight loss/exercise more/more productive time thing going on. I am 43-going-on-FAT right now, so I seriously have to address the weight thing. But besides that, I want to:

1. Read More Books I Actually Own:
We are moving in a month or so, and the books are overrunning the house. Plus I keep reserving ones at the library, and reading them ahead of the TBR pile. Boo, Megan, acquire more space by reading more!

2. See More Inspirational Movies:
And by that I don't mean Chariots of Fire, or Mr. Holland's Opus; no, I mean movies with scathingly charming heroes and passionate, opinionated heroines. Films that will inspire me to write.

3. Have More Fun, by Which I Mean Have More Sex.

4. And More Sleep (counter-intuitive to the above item, but this is my list, damn it!)

5. Keep A Somewhat Clean House (after the move, natch).

6. Um . . .

7. Forget Fewer Things

8. Get an Agent and Write Two Books

9. Sell Books, too. Not used ones, but ones I've written and everything.

10. Maybe do a Risky Post That Isn't All About Me:
Falls into the "if wishes were horses, then beggars would ride" category.

Happy Friday!

Megan
www.meganframpton.com

Tackling the new year

I'm not a great fan of new year's resolutions because I think they're asking for trouble and disappointment, but there are some things I'd like to accomplish this year (in addition to the big fat sales).

One is to go and see this exhibit, Marketing Shakespeare, at the Folger Shakespeare Library. The exhibit opened in September. It ends on Saturday so unless I can scoot off from work early tomorrow, I must go Saturday morning. The exhibit is of Shakespeare-inspired artwork from the fashionable Boydell Gallery (1789-1805), plus tchotchkes and Shakespeare souvenirs. The illustration below, courtesy of the Folger, is a colored engraving of As You Like It from 1800. One of my resolutions, were I to use the term which I'm not, is to go to more stuff--I live near Washington DC where we have all sorts of amazing free museums and exhibits, yet the amazing thing is I hardly ever go to any of them. I'm not alone--living here, you take it for granted that the museums will always be there, and if you miss an exhibit, you'll be able to catch something equally good the next week, or month.

But this is also tied into my other resolution, which is to put the joy back in writing. I tried Julia Cameron's The Artists Way technique--I even have the books somewhere--but anything which requires me having to get up early is doomed. One task she suggested, of which I approve highly, is to take yourself out on cultural expeditions, and that's something I plan to do much more. And if it has some weird side benefit of cranking up my writing and enjoyment level thereof, well, I'm not complaining.

And what else for 2008? Well, obviously, much less of this sort of thing (yum). But I'd rather concentrate on the positive--on giving and enjoying rather than denying. And hopefully writing will be one of the activities I'll enjoy. I must say I like it well enough once I've got going, but getting going is the problem. One technique I use is to absolutely ignore word/page count and just write; you can always format later. There's something very seductive about the getting ready to fix starting to prepare to ...[insert your favorite procrastinatory phrase]... write; no wonder so many people claim they've always wanted to write a book, happy in the knowledge that they probably never will.

What are your new year's resolutions (if any?)--or whatever you want to call them?

Get a generous quota of calorie-free whipped cream every month via the Riskies newsletter; send an email with NEWSLETTER in the header to riskies@yahoo.com. All contests all the time--enter to win a signed copy of Jane Lockwood's Forbidden Shores in a contest sponsored by Pam Rosenthal ; and read an alternate ending to The Rules of Gentility and enter to win a prize at janetmullany.com.

Elena's New Year's Reading Resolutions

I recently read that about 50% of Americans make New Year's Resolutions but only about 15% of those manage to keep them. I'm not surprised. Each year in January our local YMCA gets crowded but by February the swim lanes free up and there's room in the exercise classes again.

Anyway, I'm not much into New Year's resolutions but this year I'm making one that's humble and painless. I'm going to trim my other responsibilities just a little and make more time to read. I'm going to make a real dent in my TBR list, which I actually put on paper yesterday. Here are some of the books--I may not get to them all, of course, but I hope to at least read a few in each category.

Firstly I want to catch up on my fellow Riskies' books. I also will treat myself to another Laura Kinsale. There are just 2 of her backlist I haven't read yet. I'm savoring them in the hopes that by the time I'm done she'll have a new one out. I also want to read more of Judith Ivory's backlist. She's another who writes beautiful and different romance. I also want to try something by Anne Stuart--maybe titles mentioned by Janet and Megan in our Best Reads of 2007 Week.

Through my book group, I've read more mainstream and literary fiction than I used to but of course reading begets more reading. So now I have a number of solid book group recommendations including titles like The English Patient, The Secret Life of Bees, Far Pavilions.

This year I'd like to start repairing a great gap in my education as a historical romance author. I'm well-read in Austen, the Brontes and Sir Walter Scott but want to delve more into period fiction. That section of my TBR list includes boooks like Pamela and Evelina and Elizabeth Gaskell's Wives and Daughters.

It's been too long since I've read any fantasy besides Harry Potter. Based on everyone's recommendations, I know I'd love the Temeraire series by Naomi Novik. My oldest child raved about Cornelia Funke's Inkheart books; I must try those too. I'm also curious to read The Golden Compass. The controversy about its treatment of religion intrigues me as much as everything else. Maybe I can get to this by the time the movie is making its second rounds.

I want to continue Cornwell's Sharpe series. If I have time, I'd also like to delve into Horatio Hornblower and the Patrick O'Brian books.

I'm sure I'll keep reading research books. High on my list are Amanda Foreman'sGeorgiana: Duchess of Devonshire and Ian Kelly's Beau Brummell.

I like to try at least one new book on the craft of writing each year. I recently finished Stephen King's On Writing (another blog on that) so the next on my list is Joseph Campbell's Hero with a Thousand Faces. Critics of Vogler's The Writer's Journey claim Vogler just ripped off Campbell. I like The Writer's Journey a lot and suspect Vogler added to Campbell's ideas and made them easier to work with. Still, I expect the original to yield up some new treasures.

And just for fun, I want to read something about crop circles, just because I find them interesting.

So these are my New Year's Reading Resolutions. What do you think? Are there any books I should add, remove, replace?

Do you have any New Year's Reading Resolutions? What are they?

And how can anyone ever complain that there's nothing interesting to read????

Elena
www.elenagreene.com

JANE AUSTEN MOVIE CLUB: Northanger Abbey (1986)

Welcome to the Jane Austen Movie Club! On the first Tuesday of each month, we at Risky Regencies discuss a different Jane Austen adaptation.

This month: the 1986 BBC version of Northanger Abbey!

As I mentioned last month during our Jane Austen Novel discussions, Northanger Abbey is one of my favorite Austens. The wit, the liveliness, the Bath background -- I love to read it again and again.

(That is, I love to read the first half of the novel. Sometimes I stop there. Sometimes I go on. I do like the second half, but for me, it comes nowhere near the exuberantly silly Bath bits.)

So... Have you ever seen this adaptation?

If so, what did you think?

To aid the discussion, here's the cast (etc) info on the movie, courtesy imdb, plus a few interesting cast tidbits (in green):

DIRECTOR: Giles Foster

SCREENPLAY: Maggie Wadey

CAST:


Katharine Schlesinger ... Catherine Morland

Peter Firth ... Henry Tilney

Peter Firth played Joseph Andrews in 1977 -- I'd love to see that!

Robert Hardy ... General Tilney

Robert Hardy played Sir John Middleton in the Ang Lee Sense & Sensibility, and more recently has portrayed Cornelius Fudge in the Harry Potter movies.

Googie Withers ... Mrs. Allen

Geoffrey Chater ... Mr. Allen

Cassie Stuart ... Isabella Thorpe

Jonathan Coy ... John Thorpe

Jonathan Coy played the Prince of Wales in the Richard E. Grant versions of the Scarlet Pimpernel, and was also in one of the Gruffudd Horatio Hornblowers.

Ingrid Lacey ... Eleanor Tilney

Greg Hicks ... Frederick Tilney

Philip Bird ... James Morland

Elvi Hale ... Mrs. Thorpe

Helen Fraser ... Mrs. Morland

David Rolfe ... Mr. Morland


So...good, bad, or ugly? Did you like it, or did you not?

Two notes: first, I will be out most of today; I'm seeing the Rose Parade this morning (first time ever!), and in the evening I'll be attending a going away dinner for my mother, who's setting off on a round-the-world cruise. But I'll check in whenever I get a moment!

Note 2: In the US, PBS will start showing the new Jane Austen adaptations this month. And on the Tuesday following each of these new Austens, we'll have an extra Jane Austen Movie Club here, to talk about it! So the January schedule will be:

Persuasion: airs January 13; discussion January 15
Northanger Abbey: airs January 20; discussion January 22
Mansfield Park: airs January 27; discussion January 29


So... What did you think of the 1986 Northanger Abbey?

Cara
Cara King, who thinks this will be a very exciting January
 
2005-2008 © Risky Regencies
Designed by Enchanted Web Style